Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the pocso act 2012 section 13 · Page 1 of about 1,010 results (0.063 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 13 2026

KUMARAGURU Vs State rep.by, The Station House Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-13-2026

at Puducherry, against the Page1 of 8 petitioners, for the offences punishable under Sections 6 and 17 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 137(2) and 49 of the BNS, 2023, on the ground of compromise.2. The learned counsel appearing … The Station House Officer Mangalam Police Station, Puducherry. (Cr.No.44/2025)2. V.Sasikumar3. xxxxxxxxxxx ..RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S, 2023, to call for the records and quash the Final report filed in Spl.S.C.No.51 of … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 13-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA1. Kumaraguru2. Iyyanar3. Kuppusamy ..Petitioners Vs1. State rep.by,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2019

Rahul Dev Mandal @ Rahul vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-02-2019

Subject : Education

sentence dated 06.06.2015, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge in FIR No.201/2013, registered under Sections 363/366/376 IPC and 4 POCSO Act, 2012 P.S. Chankyapuri whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO … that Sh. Hari Kishan, father of the prosecutrix reported on 12.11.2013 that his younger daughter (prosecutrix) aged about 13 years had gone to a shop on the said day at about 12:30 p.m. for making some purchase,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-09-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012Section 506 IPC. In addition, the trial judge directed compensation to be paid specifying the amounts at ₹ 13 lakhs payable with reference to Section 33 (8) of POCSO Act read with Rule 7 (2) of Protection

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 23 2024

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2024

Subject : Right to Information

morals and therefore has committed a cognizable offense under Section 67 (B) IT ACT & 15 (1) of the POCSO Act 2012. [...].” B. IMPUGNED ORDER9 Aggrieved by the aforesaid, the respondent No.1 went before the High Court of Judicature … Whether the Presumption under Section 30 of the POCSO can be resorted to in a Quashing Proceeding?. ..................................................................................... 130 iv. Whether the case at hand was one fit for the High Court to quash?......... 141 a. Plea

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2019

Rinku @ Ram Prasad vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-30-2019

Subject : Criminal

further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, with it having been directed that both the sentences would run concurrently.2. The Trial Court Record was requisitioned, … PW-3 before the learned Trial Court aged 6 years at the time when her testimony was recorded on 13.12.2017 was examined by the learned Trial Court to ascertain whether she was capable of understanding the questions and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2022

Nawabbudin Vs. State Of Uttarakhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-08-2022

Subject : Criminal

Court held the accused guilty for the offences punishable under Section 376(2)(i) of IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The Trial Court sentenced the 3 accused to undergo life imprisonment and also directed to pay monetary fine … contains two sections, namely, Section 3 and Section 4. Section 3 defines the offence of “Penetrative Sexual Assault” 13 whereas Section 4 lays down the punishment for the said offence. Likewise, Part B of the said Chapter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2023

XXX vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-16-2023

376 of IPC, Sections 3(b), 4, 5 (i) r/w 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, POCSO Act) and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice-:4:-(Care and Protection of Children) Act (for short, … Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the accused under Sections 3(b) r/w 4 and 5 (i) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 75 of the JJ Act. Apart from the substantive sentence, a total fine amount of `75,000/- … -I), Alappuzha. The accused was the neighbor of the victim girl, aged 13 years. The offences alleged were under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2023

XXX vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-16-2023

376 of IPC, Sections 3(b), 4, 5 (i) r/w 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, POCSO Act) and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice-:4:-(Care and Protection of Children) Act (for short, … Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the accused under Sections 3(b) r/w 4 and 5 (i) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 75 of the JJ Act. Apart from the substantive sentence, a total fine amount of `75,000/- … -I), Alappuzha. The accused was the neighbor of the victim girl, aged 13 years. The offences alleged were under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2018

Irappa Vs. State of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Aug-16-2018

Subject : Criminal

victim who is aged five years. Despite of it, the trial Court has held conviction u/S4and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Even the accused did not commit the offence as an aggravated penetrative sexual assault as u/S6of the POCSO … STATION, BAILHONGAL.-. APPELLANT - (BY SRI PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, GOVT. PLEADER) RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) OF CR.P.C. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LEARNED III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS … to be committed by the accused on her daughter between 07.09.2014 and 13.09.2014, it is in the knowledge of that P.W.1 as well as her

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2023

Vasu V.B., S/O.Balan, C.No.163/16 vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-30-2023

prosecution. According to her the inordinate delay occurred being unexplained, credence cannot be given to the prosecution case.10. POCSO Act, 2012 came into force only on 14.11.2012 and the incident was allegedly occurred in the month of August2012. According … accused had committed rape on CW1 who is a minor girl aged 13 years on a day in the month of August during Onam season, … is the sole accused in the said case. He was chargesheeted by Mananthavady police for offences punishable under Sections 376(1) and 506 (ii) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'theIPC') and Section 5(l) read with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial