Advanced Search Results

Sethunath vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine of `25,000/- under Section 12 of the POCSO Act. Fine amount of `1,00,000/- on realisation was directed to be given to PW1 as compensation under Section 357 … 9(l) and 11(iii) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(for short ‘POCSO Act’) and convicted and sentenced respectively to undergo rigorous imprisonment … convicted and sentenced respectively to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay fine of `50,000/- under Section 10 of the POCSOAct and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 more months,

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said … School would work till evening 4.15 p.m. and that his elder daughter Seetha was staying in hostel etc. 10. It is the version of the Appellant that Ex.P2/Complaint was not written by P.W.2 (mother of P.W.1/victim) and

Sri Gangadharappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

been convicted for offences punishable under Section 376(2)(1) of the IPC, 1860 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and so also for offences under Section 3(1)(w) and 3(2)(v-a) of the SC & ST (POA) Act, 1989. … a short period and judgment of conviction and order of sentence has been rendered within a period of 10 days, that too in respect of heinous offences under Section 376(2)(1) of the IPC, and Sections 4 and

KUMARAGURU Vs State rep.by, The Station House Officer

Court : Chennai

at Puducherry, against the Page1 of 8 petitioners, for the offences punishable under Sections 6 and 17 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 137(2) and 49 of the BNS, 2023, on the ground of compromise.2. The learned counsel appearing … The Station House Officer Mangalam Police Station, Puducherry. (Cr.No.44/2025)2. V.Sasikumar3. xxxxxxxxxxx ..RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S, 2023, to call for the records and quash the Final report filed in Spl.S.C.No.51 of

S.Hari Vs State by,

Court : Chennai

and remanded to judicial custody on 07.01.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 9(f) r/w Section 10 of POCSO Act, 2012 in Crime No.01 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The allegation against

B. Jaya Kumar Vs The State Rep.by, Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

punishable under Sections 354(C) of IPC and Sections 9(1), 9(n) read with Sections 10, 11(3) and 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012, in Crime No.19 of 2025, seeks bail. Page1 of 5 2.The allegation against the petitioner is that the … Police Station, SRMC, Mangadu, Chennai - 600 122. Ref.Cr.No.19 of 2025. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.19 of 2025 on the file of the

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … assault or use of criminal force (as the case may be) against a woman (which expression denotes, per Section 10 Cr.P.C., “a female human being of any age”) from which the intention to outrage, or knowledge of likelihood

Manikandan vs the State Rep by,

Court : Chennai

Inspector of Police (P.W.16)had registered an F.I.R. (Ex.P11) for the offences under Sections 3 read with 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and 506(i) of IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989.5. Police Constable (P.W.8) had taken the … run concurrently.3. It is the case of the prosecution that the victim (P.W.2) is a minor, whohad discontinued 10th standard. Victim’s father (P.W.1) belongs to Scheduled Caste community and the victim worked in a hospital viz., Santha

Ibrahim Khaleel S/o Sarvar Sheb Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned HCGP for respondents and perused the papers.8. Section 23 of the POCSO Act reads as under:23. Procedure for media.- 1. No person shall make any report or present comments on any … Sessions Judge, Ballari, for the offences p/u/s 228(a) of IPC, 23(A) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, under Section 74(1) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. This Criminal Petition coming on

Sri Krishna R. Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

added the other offences punishable under Sections 366 and 376 of IPC and Sections 5(l) and 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.4. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that this petitioner has been falsely implicated … the medical evidence placed before the Court also discloses that she was 10 subjected to sexual act and there was a sign of recent sexual … BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION439OF CR.P.C. PRAYING THIS COURT TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.193/2019 (SPL.C.C.NO.70/2020) REGISTERED BY GIRINAGAR POLICE STATION,