Advanced Search Results

Arunachalam Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Tiruvarur

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and Section 376(2)(n) of IPC, alternatively, under Section 6 read with 5(1) of POCSO Act, 2012 and 506(ii) of IPC. By judgment dated 21.07.2014, the trial court convicted the accused for offence under Section

M. Loganathan Vs. State rep. By Inspector of Police, Erode District

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

under Section 428 Cr.P.C. Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 376(1), Section 377 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4 Conviction Trial Court convicted and sentenced accused-Appellant for offences punishable under Section 4 of POCSO Act and

Adhimoolam vs State by

Court : Chennai

for the offences under Sections 366(A) and 376 of the IPC and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, before the Mahila Fast Track Court, Tiruvannamalai, which was taken on file as Spl.S.C.No.93 of 2018. During the … accused, challenging the conviction and sentence imposed upon him for the __________Page 1 of 16 offence under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act … Rep. by Inspector of Police, Thellar Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Cr.No.70/2016. ... Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said … sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Ariyalur in Spl.S.C.No.3 of 2015 dated 22.07.2015.) 1. The Appellant/Accused No.1 has preferred the instant Criminal Appeal as against the judgment dated 22.07.2015 in Spl.S.C.No.3 of

Ibrahim Khaleel S/o Sarvar Sheb Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned HCGP for respondents and perused the papers.8. Section 23 of the POCSO Act reads as under:23. Procedure for media.- 1. No person shall make any report or present comments on any … Sessions Judge, Ballari, for the offences p/u/s 228(a) of IPC, 23(A) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, under Section 74(1) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. This Criminal Petition coming on

Sitab Singh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

a wholly tutored testimony and that there had been non-compliance of the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the POCSO Act, 2012.2. Notice of the appeal was issued to the State and vide order dated 17.10.2017 qua Criminal M. B. … Chander Singh convicted vide judgment dated 6.5.2017 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, Patiala House Courts, under Section 11(ii) of the Prevention of Child from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 punishable under Section 12 thereof and sentenced vide

Irappa Vs. State of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Criminal

victim who is aged five years. Despite of it, the trial Court has held conviction u/S4and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Even the accused did not commit the offence as an aggravated penetrative sexual assault as u/S6of the POCSO … 1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE16H … STATION, BAILHONGAL.-. APPELLANT - (BY SRI PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, GOVT. PLEADER) RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) OF CR.P.C. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LEARNED III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS

Siddu Vs. The State, through Hulsoor P.S., represented by Addl. State ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Education

dated 22.04.2015. The Learned Special Judge in the said case has passed an order under Section 34 of the POCSO Act, 2012 holding that the petitioner is aged more than 18 years as on the date of the alleged offence … Sessions Judge, Bidar), in special case No. 4/2015 while passing order under Section 34 of Pocso Act .) 1. The petitioner, who is arraigned as an accused in Special Case No. 4/2015 on the file of the

Mr.Raja vs State Rep by Assistant Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

against the accused initially for the offences under Sections 342, 366 of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and 3(1)(w) (i) of SC/ST (POA) Act and subsequently the charges altered under Section 366, 342 of IPC

Shahees Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chennai

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

all against the accused to sustain the conviction. 16. Even to raise the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, 2012, there are no fundamental facts available to give a rise to such presumption. At any rate, in our … appellant by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Chennai, in S.C.No.247 of 2013 dated 22.12.2014.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant is the sole accused in S.C.No.247 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge,