Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the odisha excise act section 98 · Page 1 of about 517 results (0.080 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

scope of Entry 84 in List I which provides for levy of excise duty by Parliament, but within the scope of the expression tax on … the said contention. As observed by the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch, AIR 1964 SC 1284 by making a declaration under … on minerals at the time of sale whether as forest produce or otherwise, are not envisaged under the Act. Section 9 of the Act deals with payment of royalty in respect of mining leases, while Section 9-A deals … India, praying to declare that the respondents are not entitled to demand and collect forest development tax under Section 98-A of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 on the value of mineral sold by the petitioners in respect of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2015

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-03-2015

Subject : Education

not satisfy the requirement of a taxation law. Referring to Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, Kerala vs. M/s. Larsen and Toubro Limited [2015 SCC Online … Lakshminaryana Mining Company, India Cement Limited, M/s.Orissa Cements Limited vs. State of Orissa [AIR1991SC1676 (M/s. Orissa Cements Ltd.,) and Saurashtra Cement and Chemical Industries Limited … on minerals at the time of sale whether as forest produce or otherwise, are not envisaged under the Act. Section 9 of the Act deals with payment of royalty in respect of mining leases, while Section 9-A deals … subject.-.:207. :- (o) He also contended that an administrative notification dated 16/08/2008 cannot go beyond the provisions of Section 98-A. When that Section uses the expression “a body notified”, it would mean a body which is either a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2024

State Of U.p. . Vs. M/s. Lalta Prasad Vaish And Sons

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-23-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

securing equitable distribution and availability at fair prices. ii. The judgment in Synthetics (7J) 6. The United Provinces Excise Act 191013 was enacted to “consolidate and amend the law in force in the United Provinces relating to the … say’ in Entry 8 of List II is descriptive, enumerative and exhaustive 98 State of Karnataka v. Balaji Computers; Bansal Wire Industries v. State of … seems to us that the observations made by this Court in Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa [AIR1961SC459: (1961) 2 SCR537 , State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch and Co. [AIR1964SC1284: (1964) 4 SCR461 , … of the decision in Tika Ramji to the dispute ...... 115 viii. Section 18G of IDRA and Entry 33 of List III .................................... 119 F.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 29 2020

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-2020

Subject : Right to Information

that a confession made to an Excise Inspector under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act of 1915, would be a confession made to a police … the NDPS Act, being a penal statute, is in contradistinction to the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Act, 1944, whose dominant object is 2 to protect the revenue of the State, and that therefore, judgments rendered … few years later, in Da Costa v. Jones [Da Costa v. Jones 98 ER1331 , Lord Mansfield upheld the privacy of a third person when … 38.On the other hand, the CrPC has been made expressly applicable by the following sections of the NDPS Act: section 34(2), which refers to the form of a security bond; section 36B, which refers to the High Court’s

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1965

Kalyani Stores Vs. the State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-21-1965

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 13, 27, 28, 90 and 293; Indian Councils Act, 1892 - Sections 5; Bangalore Municipal Corporation, 1949 - Sections 97 and 98; Devolution Rules; Indian Tariff Act, 1894; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1951; Government of India Act, 1935; Excise and Abkari Act; Constitution of India (4th Amendment) Act, 1955; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 276, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304(1), 305, 366(10), 372 and 395

Reported in : AIR1966SC1686; [1966]1SCR865

held a licence as retail vendors for ' all types of foreign liquor' under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915. The expression foreign liquor apparently includes Ale, Beer, Port, Cider and other fermented Liquors, cordials, mixtures and … Corporation of Bangalore purporting to act under the authority conferred by s. 98 of the City of Bangalore Municipal Corporation Act 69 of 1949 resolved … J. 1. The appellants-Kalyani Stores - deal in liquor at Rourkela, District of Sundergarh in the State of Orissa. The appellants held a licence as retail vendors for ' all types of foreign liquor' under the Bihar … manufacture, possession and sale of certain kinds of liquor and intoxicating drugs. Section 27 of the Act as amended by the Adaptation Order, 1950, Provides:

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2009

PrawIn Kumar Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-18-2009

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 107(2009)CLT385

transparency and making safe the huge Govt, revenue involved.As per provisions under Section-23 of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act 1915(1) a grantee of an exclusive privilege under Section 22 shall not let or assign the same or … 92) bansapani, (3) Juruli, (4) Kalimati, (5) Barbil, (6) Bhadrsahi, (7) Thakurani, 98) Balani, (9) Remuli and (10) Khumpura in the year 2003-04. While confirming … Sri Prawin Kumar entered into a partnership deed with one Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu of Titilagarh, Dist: Bolangir, Orissa on 1.5.05 declaring therein that he has already applied for addition of the name of Sri Rajesh Kumar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2003

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance and Cc ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-23-2003

Subject : CivilExcise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 35H; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(88)ECC466; 2004(177)ELT71(All)

No. 2 The Customs, Excise & Cold (Control) Appellant Tribunal, New Delhi under Section 35(c)(1) of the Central Excise Act 1945 (in short called 'Act') allowing the appeal directing both the divisions for a common central registration or … respondent that even though a ConstitutionBench of the Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Orissa v. Madan GopalRungta : [1952]1SCR28 has held that no writ petition is maintainable only forthe purpose of stay … single registration for their two Divisions in terms of Trade Notice No. 98-CE/94 dated 28.9.94. On these grounds, the appellants may for setting aside the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2001

G. Rama Rao Reddy Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Aug-14-2001

Subject : ExciseCriminal

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 47

Reported in : 2001(II)OLR486

said Jaggery (Guda) had been kept for preparation of liquor, offence Under Section 47(f) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act was made out. On the basis of the charge-sheet submitted by the Excise Officer, learned Magistrate … Jaggery (Guda) had been kept for preparation of liquor, offence Under Section 47(f) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act was made out. On the basis of the charge-sheet submitted by the Excise Officer, learned Magistrate took cognizance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2011

Union of India and anr. Vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Section 18; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226, 136

the right to carry on telecommunication activities. Interpreting the expression “exclusive privilege” of State Government under the State Excise Act to sell liquor, this Court has held in State of Orissa and Others v. Harinarayan Jaiswal and Others [(1972) 2 … the Tribunal in its order dated 07.07.2006 had already decided Petition No. 98 of 2005 of M/s Bharti Broadband and the Union of India had … Anr. vs. Issac Peter & Ors. [(1994) 4 SCC 104], State of Orissa & Ors. vs. Narain Prasad & Ors.[(1996) 5 SCC 740], State of … person to establish, maintain or work a telegraph within any part of India.” Relevant Provisions of the TRAI Act: Section 2(e) “licensee” means any person licensed under sub-Section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2024

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Income Tax Act 1961 on the payment of bottling fees made to the State Government under the Rajasthan Excise Act 1950. Section 43-B(a) allowed a deduction in respect of any sum payable by the assessee by way of … ......................... 90 iii. Examination of the “extent” of the MMDR Act ................................................. 98 H. Inter-relationship between Entry 50 of List II and Entry 54 of … are spatially located in a few mineral rich states, namely, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, and West Bengal.11 Since mineral resources are a shared inheritance of the people, it has always been

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial