Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the odisha excise act section 78 · Page 1 of about 565 results (0.080 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 10 2009

Rajeshwar S/O Hiraman Mohurle (In Jail) Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-10-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 9, 13 to 15, 19, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 36A(1) and 53; ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 24, 25 and 26; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 53; Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 77(2) and 78(3); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(81) and 171A; Police Act, 1861; Central Excise Act - Sections 21; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1955 - Sections 77 and 78(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4(2), 156, 162, 164, 173, 190 and 202; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5(2) and 156; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3816; 2009(4)MhLj483:2009(5)AIRKarR407

Sub-section (1) of Section 21. Section 21 is in terms different from Section 78(3) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 which came to be considered in Raja Ram Jaiswal's case, : 1964CriLJ705 , and which … (1) of Section 21. Section 21 is in terms different from Section 78(3) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 which came to be considered in Raja Ram Jaiswal's case, : 1964CriLJ705 , and which provided in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2001

Abdul Rashid Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-11-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8; Bihar and Orrisa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 78; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR2001SC2422; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)164; 2001(1)ALT(Cri)373; 2001(49)BLJR2368; 2001CriLJ3290; JT2001(3)SC183; RLW2001(2)SC350; 2001(3)SCALE546; (2001)9SCC578

also further came to the conclusion that in view of the positive provisions contained in Sub-section (3) of Section 78 and the powers which an Excise Officer exercises under the provisions of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, … him to the Superintendent of Excise under the provisions of Bihar and Orissa Excise Act as well as the co-accused statement stating therein that he … alleged confessional statement made by him to the Superintendent of Excise under the provisions of Bihar and Orissa Excise Act as well as the co-accused statement stating therein that he was merely a carrier and the offending article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1966

Collector of Customs, Madras Vs. Kotumal Bhirumal Pihlajani and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-1966

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 107, 108 and 135; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 23(1)(A) and 23(B); Defence of India Rules - Rule 131-B; Evidence Act - Sections 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 5(2), 161 and 162; Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Sea Customs Act - Sections 171-A

Reported in : AIR1967Mad263; 1967CriLJ1007

from a confession to a police officer. They also pointed out the distinction between the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act and the sea Customs Act in two respects, one what that the former does not exercise any judicial … v. State of Bihar, . That case arose under the Bihar and Orissa ExciseAct, 1915, which had a provision under Section 78(3) to the effect … offence, can be considered to be police officers, within the meaning of Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act. Section 107 of the Act 52 of 1962 reads thus: (Section quoted)Section 108 reads thus: (Section quoted).(18) We purpose

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 01 1966

Badku Joti Savant Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-01-1966

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167 (81); Land Customs Act, 1924 - Sections 9; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 8(1); Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 9, 13, 14, 18, 19, 21, 21(2) and 37(2) ; Indian Evidence Act - Sections 24 and 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 - Sections 173 and 190; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 77(2) and 78(3)

Reported in : AIR1966SC1746; 1966CriLJ1353; 1978(2)ELT323(SC); [1966]3SCR698

by majority itwas held that an excise officer under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act (No. 2 of1915) was a police officer within the meaning … Bihar 0065/1963 : 1964CriLJ705 where by majority itwas held that an excise officer under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act (No. 2 of1915) was a police officer within the meaning of s. 25 of the Evidence Act. 6. … support of this view is Nanoo SheikhAhmed v. Emperor I.L.R. (1927) Bom. 78. The other view which may be calledthe narrow view is that the … this behalf may arrest any person whom he has reason to believeto be liable to punishment under the Act. Section 18 lays down that allsearches made under the Act or any rules made thereunder and all arrests madeunder

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2020

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-2020

Subject : Right to Information

that a confession made to an Excise Inspector under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act of 1915, would be a confession made to a police … the NDPS Act, being a penal statute, is in contradistinction to the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Act, 1944, whose dominant object is 2 to protect the revenue of the State, and that therefore, judgments rendered … used in section 53A, which is during the course of investigation of 78 offences2. As a matter of fact, the notifications issued under the Act … 38.On the other hand, the CrPC has been made expressly applicable by the following sections of the NDPS Act: section 34(2), which refers to the form of a security bond; section 36B, which refers to the High Court’s

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1963

Raja Ram Jaiswal Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-1963

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 2(8), 7, 47, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 77, 78, 78(3), 80, 82, 95 and 96; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1898 - Sections 156 and 162; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1964SC828; 1964CriLJ705; [1964]2SCR752

specially empowered Inspectors of Excise and Sub-Inspectors of Excise to investigate any offence punishable under the Act. 42. Section 78 reads : (a) any of the powers conferred upon a Police Officer making an investigation, or upon an … in the present appeal. For, under s. 78(3) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 (2 of 1915) an Excise Officer empowered under s. … the judgment of the Patna High Court affirming the conviction of the appellant under s. 47(a) of the Excise Act and the sentences of rigorous imprisonment for one year and of fine amounting to Rs. 2,000 awarded by … sub-s. (2) of s. 161 Cr.P.C., and by the Customs Officer under s. 171-A of the Sea Customs Act. Section 162 of the Code does not confer any power on a police officer. It only provides that any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1974

Balukishan A. Devidaval Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-19-1974

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1975CriLJ1891

J. dissenting) that Inspector and Sub-Inspector of Excise under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 were 'police officers.'(3) Soni Vallabhadas Liladhar v. Asst. Collector … Macleod, O J. and Crump, J, held in the case of a prosecution under the Bombay Salt and Excise Act, an Excise Officer was not a police officer within the meaning of Section 25 of the Indian Evidence … section at that page as can be seen from the corresponding page 785 of here the most relevant Section 78 (3) is quoted as follows:(3) For the purposes of Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1980

Balkishan A. Devidayal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-31-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 8(1), 9(3), 9(4), 14, 160, 161, 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(2), 5, 6, 7, 8, 8(1), 9, 9(3), 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 19B, 21, 22, 23, 25, 77, 78(3), 154, 155(2), 156, 160, 162, 162(1), 173, 173(1), 173(4), 190, 190(1) and 251-A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 132 and 133; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 8, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 9(3), 9(4), 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 32, 77(2), 78(3), 145, 162, 162(1) and 165

Reported in : AIR1981SC379; (1980)82BOMLR471; 1980CriLJ1424; (1980)4SCC600; [1981]1SCR175

Bench. There, the question was, whether an Excise Officer exercising the power of investigation under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915, is a 'police officer' within the meaning of Section 25, Evidence Act. Mudholkar, J. speaking … There, the question was, whether an Excise Officer exercising the power of investigation under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915, is a 'police officer' within the meaning of Section 25, Evidence Act. Mudholkar, J. speaking for himself … Ram Singh who was having R.R. No. 982859 Invoice No. 3 for 78 M.S. Plates and Invoice No. 2 RR No. 892857 for 60 M.S.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1971

The State of Gujarat Vs. Abdul Rehman Ismail Gurji and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-25-1971

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1972CriLJ1101

are conferred upon Inspector or Sub-Inspector of Excise by the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act. It is the possession of these powers which enables police … which a police officer enjoys are conferred upon Inspector or Sub-Inspector of Excise by the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act. It is the possession of these powers which enables police officers and those who are deemed to be … in that behalf, observing:It is precisely this question which falls for consideration in the present appeal. For, under Section 78(3) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act. 1915 (2 of 1915) an Excise Officer empowered under Section 77. … possession of railway property.' Section 4 deals with 'Punishment for connivance at offences' affainst the provisions of the Act. Section 5 clearly indicates:Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (5 of 1898), an offence under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2014

Gurua Naik Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Customs Officer, and also taking note of Section 78 (3) and 77 (2) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 including provisions contained in Section 156, Cr.P.C., Hon’ble Supreme Court in the said case (Raja Ram Jaiswal’s) … Madhya Pradesh, ‘Village Choukidar’ in Bihar and ‘Police Patil’ in Maharashtra are equivalent posts of ‘Grama Rakshi’ in Odisha. 16 17. Oblivious of these developments, Mr. G.S. Pani, learned counsel for the appellant relies on the case

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial