Advanced Search Results

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

be a police officer. Then, the PMLA is distinguished from the 1962 Act, Sea Customs Act, 187826, Central Excise Act, 194427 and the CGST Act. The dissenting opinion of Subba Rao, J.in Barkat Ram28 is also relied upon. … 1878 Act, inserted by Section 12 of the Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Section 108 of the 1962 Act; Section 14 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944118 and Section 40 of the FERA. Learned counsel further … violation of Article 21 of the 85 Supra at Footnote No.80 (paras 101-102) 86 2020 (3) SCC63787 Supra at Footnote No.3 62 Constitution by virtue

Balukishan A. Devidaval Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1975CriLJ1891

then was) Mudholkar. JJ.. Raghubar Dayal J. dissenting) that Inspector and Sub-Inspector of Excise under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 were 'police officers.'(3) Soni Vallabhadas Liladhar v. Asst. Collector of Customs AIR 1965 SC 481 … Macleod, O J. and Crump, J, held in the case of a prosecution under the Bombay Salt and Excise Act, an Excise Officer was not a police officer within the meaning of Section 25 of the Indian Evidence … does not cease to be the main object for the R, P. 101. I would like to add that besides the distinction which I have

Pukhraj Pannalal Shah and ors. Vs. K.K. Ganguly and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 5(2), 162 and 439; Criminal Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 104(3) and 108; Constitution of India - Article 20(3)

Reported in : AIR1968Bom433; (1968)70BOMLR231; 1968CriLJ1617

of Bihar, : 1964CriLJ705 . That case arose under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915, where it is strenuously argued, the earlier view has … in Raja Ram v. State of Bihar, : 1964CriLJ705 . That case arose under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915, where it is strenuously argued, the earlier view has been modified. In this case the statement was … cases where offence was committed by a person who did not fall within S. 169 of that Act.13. Section 101 of the Act of 1962 expands the area of operation and is not confined to the Customs limits. … Customs limits.14. Section 102 of the Act of 1962 is somewhat similar to S. 170 of the old Act. Section 170 of the old Act provided that if the person about to be searched required the officer, the

State Of U.p. . Vs. M/s. Lalta Prasad Vaish And Sons

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

securing equitable distribution and availability at fair prices. ii. The judgment in Synthetics (7J) 6. The United Provinces Excise Act 191013 was enacted to “consolidate and amend the law in force in the United Provinces relating to the … power to regulate it.[…].” 194 See Alcohol Denaturants-Specification (Second Revision), ICS71100.80 Page 101 of 123 PART E immaterial for the purposes of delineating the field … seems to us that the observations made by this Court in Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa [AIR1961SC459: (1961) 2 SCR537 , State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch and Co. [AIR1964SC1284: (1964) 4 SCR461 , … of the decision in Tika Ramji to the dispute ...... 115 viii. Section 18G of IDRA and Entry 33 of List III .................................... 119 F.

M/S. Jai Jagannath Marble. Vs. the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Cu ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Orissa Value Added Act - Sections 74(5), 101, 74(3) (4) (5); Central Excise Act - Section 11A (2).

Processors, (2008) 231 ELT 3 (SC) wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court while considering Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (Levy of penalty) determined that the application of the aforesaid section would depend upon the existence or … could have been initiated against him and that, the appropriate provision in the present circumstances ought to have Section 101 of the OVAT Act and had a proceeding been initiated against the petitioner under Section 101 of the … 6.2.2009, passed by the learned Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Northern Zone, Orissa, Sambalpur (Opposite Party No.2), confirming the order passed by the Sales Tax

State Of Orissa Vs. M/s Utkal Distilleries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

after distillation.20. Even the perusal of Section 27(1) read with Section 2(6) of the erstwhile Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’), which governed the 16 field at the relevant time, would … 1 NON­REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5666­5668 OF2009STATE OF ORISSA & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S UTKAL DISTILLERIES LTD. .... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The present appeals challenge

Jagdish Prasad Jaiswal and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 74(2), 163(3), 226 and 227; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915

Reported in : 1993(II)OLR476

Secretary to the Government in the Revenue and Excise Department and is addressed to the Excise Commissioner of Orissa and states that the out stilted system shall be introduced in the aforesaid districts during the year 1993-94. … reviewed by a writ Court. The policy decision related to a matter covered by the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915, Section 22 of which deals with the grant of 'exclusive privilege'. This expression is used in Section … 'Government has been pleased to sanction 41 (forty-one) main outstill shops with 101 (one hundred one) branches ...'. Auction as notified was held on 10-2-1993

M.R. Patel Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 2(7), 8, 8(3), 34, 35, 38, 40, 45 and 91; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1966SC343; 1965(0)BLJR443; [1965]2SCR693

of six shops in the town of Jamshedpur working under the sliding scale system under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 (Bihar and Orissa Act 2 of 1915) hereinafter referred to as the Act. A total … six shops in the town of Jamshedpur working under the sliding scale system under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 (Bihar and Orissa Act 2 of 1915) hereinafter referred to as the Act. A total sum of … the Board of Revenue, in exercise of its powers of revision under section 8 of the Act, set aside the order of the Commissioner of … of the renewal of the licenses is contrary to the instruction No. 101(10) of the Board of Revenue at p. 39 of Vol. III of

Radhey Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bihar Excise Act - Sections 22, 30 to 35, 40, 42, 44, 44(1), 89 and 90; Bihar Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 20; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1921; [2007(3)JCR85(Jhr)]

power to the Board to make Rules. The Board of Revenue has notified instructions under the Bihar & Orissa Excise Act. Chapter-III deals with the settlement and licenses. Rule 74 provides the term of license as one … forthwith.26. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Bihar Excise Act, Section 44-Renewal of licence-Surrender of licence applied in Group-I-Application rejected-Premature surrender not accepted-Contention-Proof of payment of licence fee for … group-I for the period 2006-07 and in terms of Board's Notification No. 101 no such renewal is permissible unless an application for renewal of license

P. Murugan Vs. The Registrar, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal and Ot ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

SC 1981. (xxiv) In M/s.Oswal Agro Mills Ltd., v. Collector of Central Excise and others reported in 1993 Supp (3) SCC 716 = AIR 1993 … considered in the light of the general purpose of the Act itself". 101. In RBI v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd., [(1987) 1 … SCC 144 : 1978 SCC (LandS) 165]). (xxi) In Utkal Contractors and Joinery Pvt. Ltd., v. State of Orissa reported in 1987 (3) SCC 279, at Paragraph 9, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as follows: "A statute … by the petitioner. Indisputably, the petitioner was neither borrower nor guarantor, but any other person under the SARFAESI Act. Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act does not distinguish between borrower, guarantor or any other person, who is aggrieved