Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the odisha excise act 2005 section 78 · Page 1 of about 295 results (0.084 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 30 2009

Bellary Iron and Ores Pvt. Ltd., Mspl Ltd., Ramgad Minerals and Mining ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Dec-30-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act 1994 - Sections 65, 65(23), 65(50), 65(105), 73(1), 76, 77, 78 and 80; Motor Vehicles Act - Section 2(24); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Motor Vehicles Taxation Act; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Rule 5

Reported in : [2010]21STJ214(CESTAT-Bangalore); 2010[18]S.T.R.406; [2010]24STT557; (2010)35VST107(CESTAT-Blore)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2005

Swarnarekha Shrikant Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-05-2005

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73FF, 73FF(1), 78, 78(1), 152 and 154; ;Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 20; Orissa Sales Tax Act - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR652; 2006(3)BomCR693; 2006(2)MhLj709

v. State of Bihar and Anr.); : 1985ECR4(SC) (Assistant Collector of Central Excise v. Dunlop India Ltd. and Ors.). He further states that the judgments … in three petitions i.e. Writ Petition Nos. 5617, 5618 and 5619 of 2005 also filed applications for amendment so as to incorporate challenge to the … contention, he relies upon the judgment reported at : [1983]142ITR663(SC) (Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa and Ors.); : (1995)1SCC21 (U.P. Jal Nigam and Anr. v. Nareshwar Sahai Mathur and Anr.); : [1984]1SCR646 (Chandrika … Petitions challenge is to the order passed by the respondent No. 3 Divisional Joint Registrar in proceedings under Section 78(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short). The learned Counsel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2025

Nabha Power Limited versus Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-19-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1308

referred to.List of Acts Electricity Act, 2003; Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Act, 1944.List of Keywords Deemed export benefits; Foreign Trade Policy; Bid; Cut-off date; Notifications by Directorate General of Foreign … Central Excise, Baroda v. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises (P) Ltd. [1989] 3 SCR 784 : (1989) 4 SCC 112; Union Carbide India Limited v. Union of … Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras [2008] 15 SCR 1122 : (2008) 17 SCC 385; Commissioner of Income Tax, Orissa and Others v. M/s N.C. Budharaja and Company and Others [1993] Supp. 2 SCR 185 : (1994) Supp. … of 2017 as filed by the Nabha Power Limited (hereinafter, “NPL”) under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter, “EA 2003”), arises from the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 04 2008

Rpg Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-04-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Mumbai against the Order-in-Appeal dated 29.9.2005 by which the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai, Zone I, confirmed the Order-in-Original dated 23.2.05 passed by the … ibid for failure to file return in Form ST-3; He also imposed a penalty of Rs. 4,89,65,321/- under Section 78 of the Act ibid.3. The issue involved in this case is whether the services rendered by the appellants … (vii) They referred to the Supreme Court judgments in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa reported in 1970 (25) STC 211 and Hindustan Steel Ltd v. State of Orissa reported in 1970 (26)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2015

Mukesh Kumar and Others Vs. The Debts Recovery Tribunal rep., by its R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

(1999) 3 SCC 5); C.A. Abraham v. ITO (AIR 1961 SC 609); Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. (supra); Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Assessing Authority v. Gopi Nath and Sons (1999) Supp (2) SCC 312); Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar … subsequent proceeding between the same parties. (Swamy Atmananda v. Swami Bodhananda (AIR 2005 SC 2227); Ishwar Dutt v. Land Acquisition Collector (2005) 7 SCC 190). … Dass Agarwal(supra) Thansingh Nathmal v. Superintendent of Taxes (AIR 1964 SC 1419); Titaghur Paper Mills v. State of Orissa (1983) 2 SCC 433). It is in the discretion of the Court either to entertain a Writ Petition … the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short the SARFAESI Act ?), to set aside the proceedings … 2009 was filed by the petitioners herein, under Section 17 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial … Member Board of Revenue, Bihar (AIR 1963 SC 786). Wherever any body of persons having legal authority

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2006

Wipro Ge Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Jul-20-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2016

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2016

Subject : Right to Information

it is one of the goods on which additional excise duty is leviable under the Additional Duties of Excise Act, 1957. This Court held that though sugar was a commodity on which no sales tax is leviable because … the new law in Khyerbari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam[98].. 78 Justice Gajendragadkar who delivered the judgment of the majority held that the … context the decisions in S K Madar Saheb v. State of AP[101].; Bolani Ores Ltd v. State of Orissa[102].; G. K. Krishnan v. State of TN[103].; International Tourist Corpn. v. State of Haryana[104].; Malwa Bus Service (P) … boundaries. In discarding the expression “among the states” (which is used in Section 92 of the Australian Constitution) and “among several states” (which is used

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2022

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

be a police officer. Then, the PMLA is distinguished from the 1962 Act, Sea Customs Act, 187826, Central Excise Act, 194427 and the CGST Act. The dissenting opinion of Subba Rao, J.in Barkat Ram28 is also relied upon. … has been restored, it has not fully cured this section of its 78 Union of India vs. K.A. Najeeb, (2021) 3 SCC713:2021. SCC Online SC50(para18) … counsel also reminisces of the speech of the then Finance Minister on the Prevention of Money-Laundering (Amendment) Bill, 200534 in the Lok Sabha on 06.05.2005. However, it was also conceded that the amendment of Section 44(1)(b) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2008

Balaji Distilleries Ltd. Vs. the Secretary to Government, State of Tam ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-17-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 5(1), 13(4), 13A, 15 to 22, 22(1), 22(5), 22A and 25; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Regulations - Regulation 19 and 19(5); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1989; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 5 and 13(4); Companies Act, 1956; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947; Gujarat Sales Tax Act; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948; Uttar Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1890; Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864

Reported in : (2008)17VST59(Mad)

around Rs. 1000 crores from the above distillery and brewery units to the State exchequer by way of excise duty, sales tax, etc. During the financial year 2000-01 onwards, the company was suffering considerable loss, which resulted … 2004. Based on the audited accounts for the year ending March 31, 2005, a third reference was filed on August 24, 2005 and the BIFR … Sponge Iron Ltd. v. Rishab Ispat Ltd. [1993] 78 Comp Cas 264 are right in rejecting such … 580 (, Deputy Commercial Tax Officer v. Corromandal Pharmaceuticals : [1997]2SCR1026 and Tata Davy Ltd. v. State of Orissa [1998] 111 STC 462 is entitled to collect Rs. 53.07 crores, without any sacrifice whatsoever and even without … and contrary to the provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 and the proceedings of the fourth respondent to seek taking of … submitted that as per the mandatory requirement of Section 3(1)(o) read with Section 15 of the Sick

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2015

M/s. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Pr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-14-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. State of Orissa [(2008) 15 VST 401 (Orissa HC) (DB)]; G.E.T. Power Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Odisha [(2012) 50 VST 363 (Orissa HC) (DB)]).The conditions discernible from Section 6(2) are that, while the first sale … ((1999) 3 SCC 5); C.A. Abraham v. ITO (AIR 1961 SC 609); Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. (Supra); Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Assessing Authority v. Gopi Nath and Sons ((1999) Supp (2) SCC 312); Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar … immaterial. (State of Karnataka v. Pro Lab [(2015) 78 VST 451 (SC)];Larsen and Toubro Ltd. v. State … were subsequent sales exempt from tax under Section 6(2) of the CST Act, import sales under Section 5(2) of the CST Act, and the respondents … noted that the petitioner (Larson and Toubro) had, during the financial year 2005-06, entered into six supply contracts, two of which were with Konaseema and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial