Advanced Search Results
Lg Electronics Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune.iii
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Mar-11-2010
Excise
sections 11A and 11AB of the Excise Act or sections 73 and 75 of the Finance Act, shall apply mutatis mutandis for effecting such recoveries. … provisions of Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR) read with Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act (the Act). An amount of Rs. 5,20,632/- was confirmed towards the interest leviable under Section 11AB of the … relied on the judgment of the apex court in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. vs State of Orissa [ 1978 (2) ELT J (159) (SC), among several case laws cited in support. 3.1 We also heard … Court in the case of International Auto Ltd. vs. CCE, Bihar [ 2005(183)ELT 239(S.C.) ] wherein the appellant, a job worker, had not correctly computed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Pr ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-14-2015
Land Acquisition
v. State of Orissa [(2008) 15 VST 401 (Orissa HC) (DB)]; G.E.T. Power Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Odisha [(2012) 50 VST 363 (Orissa HC) (DB)]).The conditions discernible from Section 6(2) are that, while the first sale … ((1999) 3 SCC 5); C.A. Abraham v. ITO (AIR 1961 SC 609); Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. (Supra); Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Assessing Authority v. Gopi Nath and Sons ((1999) Supp (2) SCC 312); Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar … Rajasthan SRTC v. Krishna Kant ((1995) 5 SCC 75); Kerala SEB v. Kurien E. Kalathil ((2000) 6 … were subsequent sales exempt from tax under Section 6(2) of the CST Act, import sales under Section 5(2) of the CST Act, and the respondents … noted that the petitioner (Larson and Toubro) had, during the financial year 2005-06, entered into six supply contracts, two of which were with Konaseema and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFederation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and Others V ...
Delhi
Aug-12-2016
Service Tax
credit of duties or cess paid on any goods classifiable under Chapters 1 to 22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986). 17. These further changes by the Finance Act, 2012 have also been … unreasonable and is contrary to article 265 of the Constitution of India." 75. Consequently, the Court is satisfied that the provision of short-term accommodation in … Kerala v. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. (2016) 1 SCC 170, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Orissa High Court in Larsen and Toubro Ltd. v. State of Orissa (2008) 12 VST 31 to the effect … 226 of the Constitution of India is to the constitutional validity of Section 65 (105) (zzzzv) of the Finance Act 1994 (FA) whereby the provision
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nokia (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-23-2006
Service Tax
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwaraj Abhiyan Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-11-2016
Land Acquisition
States that is Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, Odisha, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh. Drought or “semi-scarcity” has since been declared very recently … of the NDRF are drawn from the National Calamity Contingency Duty imposed on specified goods under the Central Excise Act and the Customs Act. In addition to this, the Government of India also releases funds for the NDRF.31. … under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Generation Scheme framed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (for short “the NREGA Act”). It has also prayed that food grains be made available as specified under … December to March (north-east monsoon), is less than 75% of the average rainfall for the season and … affected by a possible drought-like situation usually belong to the most vulnerable sections of society. The sound of silence coming from these States subjects the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOres India Pvt. Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Jul-02-2007
Service Tax
(2008)9STR157
further argued that entire activity having been carried out in the State of Jharkhand, the Excise Authority of Orissa has no jurisdiction over the appellant which was very well examined by the Self Same Authority in the … above demand has already dropped the proceeding relating to the period April 2005 to April 2006 by an order dated 30.05.2007 holding that the show … 75A, penalty of Rs. 2,72,75,446/- for contravention of Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994 and interest leviable Under Section 75 of the said Act, has also filed the Stay Application for stay of realization of aforesaid demand during
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Of Orrisa Vs. Premalata Mohapatra (dead) Thr. Lrs.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-29-2021
Education
August 1998. While making such provision for grant of land, Revenue & Excise Department in the aforesaid letters had requested Home Department for award of … Before this Court, the legal heir of the writ petitioner filed information obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005 on 7.8.2009, which is as under: “ 7 xx xx xx (b) Service particulars of the deceased soldier … NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6534-6535 OF2021STATE OF ORISSA & ORS. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PREMALATA MOHAPATRA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The challenge in the … RAMASUBRAMANIAN) NEW DELHI; OCTOBER29 2021. 9 ITEM NO.1 Court 11 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. United Plastomers
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-20-2008
Service Tax
(2008)217CTR(P& H)129; 2008[10]STR229; [2007]13STT67; (2009)19VST382(P& H)
ORDERRakesh Kumar Garg, J.1. The revenue has filed the present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenging the order dated 20-6-2005 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi … imposed under Section 77 of the Act and confirmed interest on the actual amount of service tax under Section 75 of the Act.6. The assessee as well as the Department filed Appeals before the Tribunal. The Tribunal decided … Court in the case of Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. The State of Orissa 1997 S.T.C. (XXV) 211 (S.C) has ordained 'Penalty will not be imposable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinod Hinigorani Vs. The Securities and Exchange Board of India and An ...
Mumbai
Mar-10-2015
Land Acquisition
23. In G. Veerappa Pillai v. Raman and Raman Ltd., AIR (1952) SC 192; Assistant Collector of Central Excise v. Dunlop India Ltd., AIR (1985) SC 330; Ramendra Kishore Biswas v. State of Tripura, AIR (1999) SC … of H.P. and Ors. v. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. and Anr. AIR 2005, SC 3936, the Apex court has reiterated the parameters for exercise of … not be committed to the civil prison.â Rule 75 which provides for interim custody stipulates that Pending … Abraham v. I.T.O. Kottayam and Ors., AIR (1961) SC 609; Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa and Anr., AIR (1983) SC 603; H.B. Gandhi v. M/s Gopinath and Sons, [1992] Suppl. 2 SCC 312; … Rule III and Part I of second Schedule to the Income Tax Act 1961 r/w. Section 28-A of the Securities and Exchange Board of India,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDay International Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-19-2006
Service Tax
(2006)(108)ECC253
1. In Order-in-Original dated 26.03.2005 of the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore-I Division, an amount of Rs. 53,615/- was demanded from M/s Day … payable till the date of payment of tax was imposed.Interest at the appropriate rate was also demanded under Section 75 of the Act. As per the Order-in-Original, the case against M/s Day International is that they provided technical … The stay order of the Tribunal had cited the observations of the Supreme Court in the State of Orissa v. Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. 1985 Supp. SCC 280, wherein they had defined royalty "as a payment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »