Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the odisha excise act 2005 section 63 · Page 1 of about 294 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 04 2012

industrial Development Bank of India Ltd. and Others Vs. the Deputy Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-04-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

is not aware of the dues of IDBI and the auction was conducted in accordance with the Central Excise Act. The counter affidavit of the first respondent is silent on material facts. The Central Government Standing Counsel however … For better appreciation, we may sum up the pleadings in W.P.No.17742 of 2005 before noticing the short facts in each of the cases. Writ Petition … Ltd v Asst. Commissioner of Cus. and C.E., Hyderabad 1999 (106) ELT 296 (AP),S.K. Pattanaik v State of Orissa (2000) 1 SCC 413 : AIR 2000 SC 612,Allahabad Bank v Canara Bank (2000) 4 SCC 406 : … GoI Company IDBI is a public financial institution within the meaning of Section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956 (for brevity ‘the Companies Act’) Initially

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2022

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

be a police officer. Then, the PMLA is distinguished from the 1962 Act, Sea Customs Act, 187826, Central Excise Act, 194427 and the CGST Act. The dissenting opinion of Subba Rao, J.in Barkat Ram28 is also relied upon. … proof 91-103 • Special Courts 104-114 • Bail 115-149 • Section 50 of the 2002 Act 150-173 • Section 63 of the 2002 Act 174 • Schedule of the 2002 Act 175 & 175A • ECIR vis-à-vis FIR176179 … of the then Finance Minister on the Prevention of Money-Laundering (Amendment) Bill, 200534 in the Lok Sabha on 06.05.2005. However, it was also conceded that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2016

M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-04-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

additional duties of excise and relies upon paragraphs 63, 67 and 70 of this judgment. 49. Mr. … However, the duty levied under the ADE Act is over and above the duty levied under the Central Excise Act and to distinguish it from duties levied under the Central Excise Act popularly, known as additional duties of … in Chapter 24 of the 1985 Act, pan masala may or may not contain tobacco. 32. The Finance Act, 2005 (18 of 2005) substituted the First Schedule to the ADE Act with a new First Schedule that did … 367 (Mad.) (11) K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo and Ors. v. State of Orissa 1954 SCR 1. (12) P. Vajravelu Mudaliar v. Spl. Deputy Collector for … Act, 1957. 31/01/2006 10. However, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 9(1) of the MVAT Act, 2002, the State Government of Maharashtra, vide

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 19 2025

Nabha Power Limited versus Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-19-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1308

referred to.List of Acts Electricity Act, 2003; Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Act, 1944.List of Keywords Deemed export benefits; Foreign Trade Policy; Bid; Cut-off date; Notifications by Directorate General of Foreign … Special Purpose Vehicles (hereinafter, “SPVs”) which were formulated to develop the concerned power projects. This was done under Section 63 of the EA 2003 through Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding. PSPCL is one of the successors of the Punjab State … 15 SCR 1122 : (2008) 17 SCC 385; Commissioner of Income Tax, Orissa and Others v. M/s N.C. Budharaja and Company and Others [1993] Supp.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2013

Mr.C.Thayaparan Vs. Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-2013

Subject : Education

Crime No.103/92 u/Ss.13(1)(E), 23 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against Shri Ram Singh - D.O. Excise Baitul (MP)." and the order passed by the Superintendent of Police, on which basis crime is registered, distinguishing … [S.Ramu vs. State of A.P.] 02.2012(1)MWN (Civil) 673, [Jitu Patnaik vs. Sanatan Mohakud & others]. 03.(2005)1SCC 56.[State of Orissa vs. Debendra Nath Pandhi] 04.(2009)1 SCC 68.[B.Jagdish and another vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and another] 05.(2008)14 SCC … ..Respondent/Complainant PRAYER in Crl.O.P(MD)No.7618 of 2011: This criminal original petition filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C to call for the records of the proceedings in … 88.[Vineet Narain and others vs. Union of India and another] 02.(2007)1 SCC 63.[Shashikant vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and others] 03.CDJ 200.MHC 162.[P.Sundaraparipooranan & anthers

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2021

State Of Orrisa Vs. Premalata Mohapatra (dead) Thr. Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-2021

Subject : Education

August 1998. While making such provision for grant of land, Revenue & Excise Department in the aforesaid letters had requested Home Department for award of … Before this Court, the legal heir of the writ petitioner filed information obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005 on 7.8.2009, which is as under: “ 7 xx xx xx (b) Service particulars of the deceased soldier … NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6534-6535 OF2021STATE OF ORISSA & ORS. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PREMALATA MOHAPATRA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The challenge in the … RAMASUBRAMANIAN) NEW DELHI; OCTOBER29 2021. 9 ITEM NO.1 Court 11 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2008

G.N. General Mills Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-15-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2008)152PLR109; (2008)16VST566(P& H)

present case, vide a common order dated November 27, 2006, the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals) Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar, after setting aside the assessment … of the learned Counsel for the appellant that there is no provision under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') to file any supplementary appeal or a second appeal against the same … granted in withdrawal order. In this regard, reference can be made to a Division Bench decision of the Orissa High Court in Hari Basudev v. State of Orissa : AIR2000Ori125 . Earlier, the appeals were filed within … and the earlier appeals will be deemed to be dismissed on merits, Section 63(4)(b) of the Act clearly provides that the Tribunal after affording an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2011

M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory S. Nagara ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2011

Subject : Service Tax

the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 or even under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 2003 which is a mixed question of fact and law. … namely, the first appeal to the Joint Commissioner under section 62 and second appeal to the Tribunal under section 63 of the Act. Assuming that the petitioner contends that the appeal to the Joint Commissioner is not efficacious … elaborate examination of evidence. In the case of Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. and another v. State of Orissa and others reported in (1983) 2 SCC 433, the Apex Court has held that in the matters involving

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2017

The Assistant Regional-Transport Officer, Humnabad and Another Vs. And ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Mar-23-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

The Hon ble Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-1 vs. Favorite Industries reported in 2012 (7) SCC 153 has held … notification dated 25.11.1959 was the exemption granted in respect of the motor vehicles registered in the State of Orissa on the same lines of 1958 notification. The notification dated 22.11.1962 exempted on reciprocal basis, the tax payable … omni buses (tourists vehicles) registered in the State other than State of Karnataka covered by permits granted under Section 63(7) of Old Motor Vehicles Act 1939 which is now Section 88(9) and on account of large scale of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2015

The Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad Vs. Mrs.Sudha Sasikumar

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-13-2015

Subject : Motor Vehicles

restrictions imposed thereunder. Another judgment relied upon is Assistant Collector of Central Excise v. Dunlop India Limited [(1985) 1 SCC W.A.No.149/2015 14 260]. This judgment … Co. v. Behari Lal Chaurasia [AIR1966SC455. In the above Constitution Bench judgment, the Supreme Court held that under Section 63, a permit granted by the RTA of one region is not valid in any other region unless the … paragraphs 3 and 5 which reads as under: "3. In Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa A.P. Sen, E.S. Venkataramiah and R.B. Misra, JJ.held that where the statute itself provided the petitioners with an … for temporary permit in terms of Section 87(1)(c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.4. Along with the Writ Appeal, appellant has also filed I.A.No.105/2015 producing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial