Advanced Search Results
Md. Sarif Vs. State of West Bengal
Kolkata
Oct-04-2005
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotrophic Substance Act, 1985 - Sections 21, 29, 41, 41(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 43, 50, 50(1), 50(3), 51, 56, 59 and 67; ;Customs Act - Section 108; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 100, 100(5), 164, 164(2), 165, 244 to 249, 313 and 465
(2006)1CALLT196(HC)
Act under which only a Gazzetted Officer of the Departments of Central Excise, Narcotics etc. empowered by the Central Government or State Government can either … to the case of State of Punjab v. Balwant Rai reported in 2005, Cr LJ 1739 (SC) argued that as option was offered to the … officers mentioned in Section 42 to assist each other in carrying out the provisions of the Act, while Section 59 provides for penalty of the negligent or reluctant officer unless he has a lawful excuse for failure to … 42 was not complied with. Mr. Saha, on the other hand, relying upon the case of State of Orissa v. S. Mahanti reported in 2000 Cr LJ 3469(SC) contended that the provisions of sections 41 & 42
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhimsen Sahu and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Orissa
Feb-07-2006
ExciseConstitution
Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 2(8), 8, 8(2), 29(2), 89 and 89(2); Orissa Excise Rules, 1965 - Rules 32, 59 and 60
101(2006)CLT524
consideration of MGQ for the year 2002-2003. This Court by quoting Rules 59 and 60 of the Orissa Excise Rules, 1965 and referring to Section … as the sole qualified/eligible applicant for the privilege in respect of out-still shops of Gopalpur.2. The Government of Orissa in Excise Department as per its policy for the year 2005-06 decided to grant exclusive privilege in respect … along with other districts for the remaining period with effect from 1.8.2005 (Annexure-1) under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Accordingly, the erstwhile Revenue & Excise Deptt. Notification No. 634-Ex-66/89 EX … Ray, Learned Senior Counsel, submitted that since efficacious remedy is available under Section 2(8) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act and Rule 60 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRadhey Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.
Jharkhand
Mar-14-2007
Commercial
Bihar Excise Act - Sections 22, 30 to 35, 40, 42, 44, 44(1), 89 and 90; Bihar Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 20; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act
2007(2)BLJR1921; [2007(3)JCR85(Jhr)]
power to the Board to make Rules. The Board of Revenue has notified instructions under the Bihar & Orissa Excise Act. Chapter-III deals with the settlement and licenses. Rule 74 provides the term of license as one … Group-I vide application dated 27th February, 2006 in accordance with the provisions of Section 44 of the Bihar Excise Act. The surrender of license was sought on the ground indicated in its application, wherein, it was stated that … Group-II for the period commencing from 15th December, 2004 to 31st March, 2005. These licenses were granted pursuant to acceptance of bid of the petitioner.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...
Mumbai
Oct-04-2016
Land Acquisition
However, the duty levied under the ADE Act is over and above the duty levied under the Central Excise Act and to distinguish it from duties levied under the Central Excise Act popularly, known as additional duties of … in Chapter 24 of the 1985 Act, pan masala may or may not contain tobacco. 32. The Finance Act, 2005 (18 of 2005) substituted the First Schedule to the ADE Act with a new First Schedule that did … UP v. Renusagar Power Co. (1998) 4 SCC 59. (8) Ram Krishna Dalmia and Ors.v. S.R. Tendolkar … 367 (Mad.) (11) K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo and Ors. v. State of Orissa 1954 SCR 1. (12) P. Vajravelu Mudaliar v. Spl. Deputy Collector for … Act, 1957. 31/01/2006 10. However, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 9(1) of the MVAT Act, 2002, the State Government of Maharashtra, vide
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Atchut Mucund Alornekar and Others Vs. Central Bureau of Investig ...
Mumbai Goa
Aug-29-2012
Land Acquisition
that the said facts constitutes offence punishable under Section 120-B r/w 420 of I.P.C. Relying upon “State of Orissa Vs. Debendra nath Padhi” [AIR 2005 SC 359], learned Special Public Prosecutor argued that the documents which have … Home Consumption were filed, which was also in gross contravention of Form III notified by Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) vide Notification No. 396-Cus. dated 1st August, 1976. Further, the Customs officials did not take … Officials and private firms violated Rules 58, 59 and 60 of Customs Act, 1962. The sale was fraudulently shown as on High-Sea Sale basis by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShital Fibres Limited and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-29-2006
Sales Tax
2008(225)ELT406(P& H); (2007)5VST354(P& H)
of notices, annexures P 7 to P 10, issued under Section 51 of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 by respondent No. 3, the Excise & Taxation Officer-cum-Detaining Officer, I.C.C. (Export), Mehmadpur (Shamboo), District Patiala and respondent … was made in Schedule 'A' list of tax-free goods at Serial No. 59 to the following effect:Blankets made of shoddy yarn and shawls.and Schedule 'B' … v. Leukoplast (India) Ltd. [1997] 105 STC 318 (SC) and Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa : [1983]142ITR663(SC) . It is stated that goods in question were clearly covered by Schedule 'B' and tax
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Atchut Mucund Alornekar and Others Vs. Central Bureau of Investig ...
Mumbai Goa
Aug-29-2012
Land Acquisition
that the said facts constitutes offence punishable under Section 120-B r/w 420 of I.P.C. Relying upon “State of Orissa Vs. Debendra nath Padhi” [AIR 2005 SC 359], learned Special Public Prosecutor argued that the documents which have … Home Consumption were filed, which was also in gross contravention of Form III notified by Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) vide Notification No. 396-Cus. dated 1st August, 1976. Further, the Customs officials did not take … Officials and private firms violated Rules 58, 59 and 60 of Customs Act, 1962. The sale was fraudulently shown as on High-Sea Sale basis by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNabha Power Limited versus Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-19-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025] 8 S.C.R. 1308
referred to.List of Acts Electricity Act, 2003; Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Act, 1944.List of Keywords Deemed export benefits; Foreign Trade Policy; Bid; Cut-off date; Notifications by Directorate General of Foreign … out essential ingredients for being eligible for claim of Deemed Export Benefits. 59. From the FTP, it is apparent that the foremost prerequisite to avail … Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras [2008] 15 SCR 1122 : (2008) 17 SCC 385; Commissioner of Income Tax, Orissa and Others v. M/s N.C. Budharaja and Company and Others [1993] Supp. 2 SCR 185 : (1994) Supp. … of 2017 as filed by the Nabha Power Limited (hereinafter, “NPL”) under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter, “EA 2003”), arises from the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Mascon Multiservices and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Oman Re ...
Mumbai
Aug-11-2014
Land Acquisition
S C 271 (Vol 42 C N 47) and Ascu Arch Timber Protection Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta, (2004) 10 Supreme Court Cases 653 in which it has been held that upon the surmises of … Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Rais Coastal Survey and Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. 2005 Law Suit (Bom) 311 to show that the Court interpreted the judgment … of the contract value deducted by the respondent. 59. The judgment in the case of Saw Pipes … general law. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment in the case of Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Orissa and Ors. Vs. G. C. Roy AIR 1992 SC 732 in para 43 of which the claim for … challenged in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) essentially as being vitiated by bias and upon the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Bagalkot Nirmithi Kendra vs the Union of India
Karnataka Dharwad
Nov-25-2025
C.R. BUILDING, NAVANAGAR HUBBALLI - 580 025.4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (AUDIT) CENTRAL EXCISE, AUDIT CIRCLE HUBBALLI - 580 025.5. THE UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT … an issuewhether the Nirmithi Kendra would be a ‘Government Entity’ under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The coordinate bench after considering the entire spectrum of the law, in the case of PIO & THE … Union of India, WP (C) No. 17188 of 2015,order dated 5-2-2018 (Ori)] of the Patna High Courtand the Orissa High Court extending the benefit of the Exemption Notification to the educational institutions, and a fortiori, to SPCL.”(Emphasis … conductive with other objects and generating employment opportunities, particulary for the weaker sections of the Society.” The governing body of the petitioner comprises of 14
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »