Advanced Search Results
State of Kerala and Others Vs. fr.william Fernandez Etc Etc
Supreme Court of India
Oct-09-2017
Right to Information
attracts the duty, even though it may be collected later; and we may draw attention to the Sugar Excise Act in which it is specially provided that the duty is payable not only in respect of sugar which … order under Section 9C of the 1999 Act has been made by way of Orissa Entry Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005 which came into force with effect from 19.05.2005. The writ petition has been dismissed by the Division Bench … are concerned only with entry tax legislations of States, namely, State of Orissa, State of Bihar, State of Kerala and State of Jharkhand, the relevant … which have followed judgment dated 06.01.1998 and 18.12.2006. Writ Petition (C) No. 574 of 2003 Parisons Agrotech Private Ltd. & Anr vs. State of Kerala
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Pr ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-14-2015
Land Acquisition
v. State of Orissa [(2008) 15 VST 401 (Orissa HC) (DB)]; G.E.T. Power Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Odisha [(2012) 50 VST 363 (Orissa HC) (DB)]).The conditions discernible from Section 6(2) are that, while the first sale … ((1999) 3 SCC 5); C.A. Abraham v. ITO (AIR 1961 SC 609); Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. (Supra); Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Assessing Authority v. Gopi Nath and Sons ((1999) Supp (2) SCC 312); Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar … were subsequent sales exempt from tax under Section 6(2) of the CST Act, import sales under Section 5(2) of the CST Act, and the respondents … noted that the petitioner (Larson and Toubro) had, during the financial year 2005-06, entered into six supply contracts, two of which were with Konaseema and … S.T. Muthusami v. K. Natarajan ((1988)n 1 SCC 572); Rajasthan SRTC v. Krishna Kant ((1995) 5 SCC
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjitbhai Ismailbhai Pinjara Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Mar-07-2006
Criminal
The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 21 and 41 to 57; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 54
(2006)3GLR2074
is kept or concealed. Section 41(2) empowers certain Gazetted Officers of Central Excise, narcotic, customs, revenue, intelligence etc. of the Central Government or the Border … SP Tyagi, Author of The Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, 2005 Edition, in the commentary to Section 41, has summarized the Scheme as … Thus, his evidence in this regard is not adequate and sufficient to prove panchanama.(ii)Non-compliance of the provisions of Section 57 of the N.D.P.S. Act also goes to the root of the trustworthiness of the case placed by the … of the N.D.P.S.Act. It is true that the ratio of the decision in the case of State of Orissa v. S. Mohanty and Ors. : 2000CriLJ3469 would apply to the facts of the present case and, therefore
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/s. Mascon Multiservices and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Oman Re ...
Mumbai
Aug-11-2014
Land Acquisition
S C 271 (Vol 42 C N 47) and Ascu Arch Timber Protection Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta, (2004) 10 Supreme Court Cases 653 in which it has been held that upon the surmises of … Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Rais Coastal Survey and Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. 2005 Law Suit (Bom) 311 to show that the Court interpreted the judgment … evidence for proving that no loss has occurred. 57. The ratio as laid down by the Supreme … general law. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment in the case of Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Orissa and Ors. Vs. G. C. Roy AIR 1992 SC 732 in para 43 of which the claim for … challenged in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) essentially as being vitiated by bias and upon the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi. Vs. M/S Hari Chand Shri Gop ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-18-2010
Excise
A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mill Ltd. etc. v. State of Kerala & Ors. (2007) 2 SCC 725, State of Orissa and others v. Tata Sponge Iron Ltd. (2007) 8 SCC 189, Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur v. Mewar … department was right in invoking the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 11(A)(1) of the Excise Act. This Court partly allowed the appeals holding that the department was not entitled to invoke the extended period … Jharkhand and Others v. Tata Cummins Ltd. and Another (2006) 4 SCC 57, A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mill Ltd. etc. v. State of Kerala & Ors.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. Vs. The Excise And Taxation Officer Cum Asse ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-01-2023
Land Acquisition
JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5393 OF2010M/S GODREJ SARA LEE LTD. ……APPELLANT(S) VS. THE EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER- CUM-ASSESSING AUTHORITY & ORS. …..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DIPANKAR DATTA, J.This … Entry 67 of Schedule C introduced by a notification dated 30th June, 2005, notices were issued by the Assessing Authority as to why tax liability … the appellant before the Assessing Authority that the Haryana Tax Tribunal (hereafter ‘the Tribunal’, for short), constituted under section 57 of the VAT Act, by its order dated 21st November, 2001 had the occasion to dismiss a petition … petition” and upon consideration of the decision of this Court reported in (1975) 2 SCC436(Titagarh Paper Mills vs. Orissa State Electricity Board & Anr.) based on which it was contended on their behalf that where any right
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOdisha State Financial Corporation versus Vigyan Chemical Industries a ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-05-2025
MRTP
[2025]9S.C.R.1
specific performance 30 AIR 2001 SC 544 : MANU/SC/0773/2000 [2025] 9 S.C.R. 57 Odisha State Financial Corporation v. Vigyan Chemical Industries and Others of the … the Supreme Court Judgment R. Mahadevan, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal has been filed by the Odisha State Financial Corporation, a government corporation in the State of Odisha, against the final judgment and order dated … of sub-section (2) of Section 25, additional excise duty is levied. Excise duty in terms of the Central Excise Act, it is trite, can not only be levied on finished products but also the products at intermediary stages. … of India [2005] 1 SCR 913 : (2005) 4 SCC 649 : 2005 SCC OnLine SC 213; Delhi Airtech Services (P) Ltd v. State of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalaji Distilleries Ltd. Vs. the Secretary to Government, State of Tam ...
Chennai
Mar-17-2008
Sales Tax/VAT
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 5(1), 13(4), 13A, 15 to 22, 22(1), 22(5), 22A and 25; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Regulations - Regulation 19 and 19(5); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1989; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 5 and 13(4); Companies Act, 1956; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947; Gujarat Sales Tax Act; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948; Uttar Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1890; Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864
(2008)17VST59(Mad)
around Rs. 1000 crores from the above distillery and brewery units to the State exchequer by way of excise duty, sales tax, etc. During the financial year 2000-01 onwards, the company was suffering considerable loss, which resulted … 2004. Based on the audited accounts for the year ending March 31, 2005, a third reference was filed on August 24, 2005 and the BIFR … 580 (, Deputy Commercial Tax Officer v. Corromandal Pharmaceuticals : [1997]2SCR1026 and Tata Davy Ltd. v. State of Orissa [1998] 111 STC 462 is entitled to collect Rs. 53.07 crores, without any sacrifice whatsoever and even without … and contrary to the provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 and the proceedings of the fourth respondent to seek taking of … submitted that as per the mandatory requirement of Section 3(1)(o) read with Section 15 of the Sick … 6 VST 45 : [2006] 131 Comp Cas 573, this Court considered the validity of the coercive
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Karnataka, rep. by its Chief Secretary and Others Vs. Jagadev ...
Karnataka
Jul-01-2016
Land Acquisition
Ganga Saran vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax [1985 (Supp.) SCC 205], which has been followed in Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, Kerala vs. Larsen and Toubro Ltd., [(2016) 1 SCC 170], he next contended that, the four … to allay groundless apprehensions (Source Principles of Statutory Interpretation Ninth Edition Reprint 2005 By Justice G.P.Singh]. 29. In M/s. Hiralal Rattanlal vs. Sate of U.P. … roads within the State, in terms of Entry 57 of List II of Seventh Schedule to the … Acts subsequent to the decision of the court were valid and therefore, were upheld:- a) In State of Orissa vs. Oriental Paper Mills Ltd., [AIR 1961 SC 1438], the insertion of Section 14A by way of an … These Writ Appeals are filed U/S 4 of The Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the Order passed in the Writ Petition Nos.28063/2015
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCarlsberg Breweries a/S vs.som Distilleries and Breweries Limited
Delhi
May-02-2017
Intellectual Property
affidavit shall be served on the respondent today itself. for This appeal stands disposed of. However, the entire excise details and clearances with regard to the" bottles shall be placed before the learned Single Judge on or … defendant has also relied upon Vidarbha Distillers Vs. Vidarbha Bottlers Pvt. Ltd. 2005 PTC (31) 427; Ruston Hornsby Ltd. Vs. The Zamindara Engineering Co. 1969(2) … x x x x x x x x 57. Words “Colgate” and “Anchor” are distinct and have … and is permitted, as a onetime measure, the stocks which have already been manufactured for the State of Orissa, Pondicherry, Kerala and Para-military forces. to sell C. The cases of beer bottles as well as the batch … brand “TUBORG”, design whereof is registered under the provisions of the Designs Act, 2000. The novelty of the applicant’s registered design resides in the shape … is liable to be injuncted by virtue of section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000. He submits
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »