Advanced Search Results

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

be a police officer. Then, the PMLA is distinguished from the 1962 Act, Sea Customs Act, 187826, Central Excise Act, 194427 and the CGST Act. The dissenting opinion of Subba Rao, J.in Barkat Ram28 is also relied upon. … no safeguards akin to Sections 41 to 41D, 46, 49, 50, 51, 55, 55A, 58, 60A of the Cr.P.C. Under Chapters V and VII of … counsel also reminisces of the speech of the then Finance Minister on the Prevention of Money-Laundering (Amendment) Bill, 200534 in the Lok Sabha on 06.05.2005. However, it was also conceded that the amendment of Section 44(1)(b) of

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

of 2:1 of this Court held that a confession made to an Excise Inspector under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act of 1915, would be a confession made to a police officer for the purpose of section … the NDPS Act, being a penal statute, is in contradistinction to the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Act, 1944, whose dominant object is 2 to protect the revenue of the State, and that therefore, judgments rendered … for a term that may extend to one year, or a fine 55 that may extend to ten thousand rupees or both; where the contravention

R.Prakash vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

for two years, after taking a lenient view.6. Thereafter the petitioner filed an application underthe Right to Information Act 2005 in the Excise Range Office, Anchal, on 26.05.2010 regarding his case and he was informed vide letter dated … relied on the judgments of the Apex Court in Smt. Nilabati Behera alias Lalita Behera v. State of Orissa and Others [1993 KHC 919], Nambi Narayanan S. v. Siby Mathews and Others [2018 (4) KHC 598], Shyam … An FIR was registered against him as Crime No.81/2004 on 20.04.2004, under Section 55(g) of the Abkari Act. The petitioner was a signatory to the

Anilkumar a.B. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

for two years, after taking a lenient view.6. Thereafter the petitioner filed an application underthe Right to Information Act 2005 in the Excise Range Office, Anchal, on 26.05.2010 regarding his case and he was informed vide letter dated … relied on the judgments of the Apex Court in Smt. Nilabati Behera alias Lalita Behera v. State of Orissa and Others [1993 KHC 919], Nambi Narayanan S. v. Siby Mathews and Others [2018 (4) KHC 598], Shyam … An FIR was registered against him as Crime No.81/2004 on 20.04.2004, under Section 55(g) of the Abkari Act. The petitioner was a signatory to the

M/s. Mascon Multiservices and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Oman Re ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

N 47) and Ascu Arch Timber Protection Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta, (2004) 10 Supreme Court Cases 653 in which it has been … Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Rais Coastal Survey and Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. 2005 Law Suit (Bom) 311 to show that the Court interpreted the judgment … of the amount specified in Clause 18 cannot be claimed by the respondent. 77. The petitioner relies upon section 55 of the Indian Contract Act relating to time being of the essence or not of the essence of … general law. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment in the case of Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Orissa and Ors. Vs. G. C. Roy AIR 1992 SC 732 in para 43 of which the claim for

K.c. Ninan Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

indication of a different legislative intent.82 82 Amar Chandra v. Collector of Excise, Tripura, (1972) 2 SCC442 Grasim Industries Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, (2002) … Civil Appeal No 2108 of 2004 With Civil Appeal Nos 5312-5313 of 2005 With Civil Appeal No 5314 of 2005 With Civil Appeal No 6587 … offer for purchase of the same. It is hereby expressly agreed and declared that notwithstanding the provisions of Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act or any other enactment for the time being in force in that … to the facts of the case before it. In Special Officer, Commerce, North Eastern Electricity Supply Company of Orissa v. 108 PART G Raghunath Paper Mills Private Limited,81 this Court observed that Regulation 13(10)(b) of the Orissa

Akuli Charan Das, Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2007Ori97

Madhya Pradesh High Court in AIR 2005 MP 55 and AIR 1987 MP 74 (supra). In the … XXX(2) The provisions of Sub-section (1) apply to the following taxes, namely: (a) any duty of customs or excise on goods;(b) any tax on the sale or purchase of goods. In terms of the aforesaid provisions, it … brevity we note here-under the salient facts of W.P.(C) No. 4246 of 2005. The main grievance of the petitioners is that they had entered into … I. Mahanty, J.1. In this batch of writ applications common question of law, challenging the applicability of the Orissa Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 2004 to the contracts entered into by them prior to the promulgation of the … view of Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957. Sri Panda, learned Counsel for the petitioners further stated that the

Andhrapradesh Spinning Mills Associatio Vs. Andhra Pradeshelectricity ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

State of Bihar22 (vi) Dewan Chand Builders and Contractors v. Union of India23 (vii) Har Shankar v. Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner24 (viii) M/s. Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. State of Karnataka25 16. It is further argued that … Revenue Requirement for the next year in terms of Regulation 4 of 2005. The impugned Regulations insofar as they seek to add other non-fuel related … Chand v. State of Uttar Pradesh6 (vii) Ch. Tika Ramji v. State of Uttar Pradesh7 (viii) State of Orissa v. M/s. M.A. Tulloch and Co.8 11. It has been submitted that the impugned Regulation, namely Regulation 45-B … vires of Section 26(2) and (9) of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act 1998') to the extent it empowers … and 56, 132, 148, 284, 346, 367, 394, 552, 1500, 1700, 2934, 3193, 3195, 3226, 3392, 3425,

Jitendra S/O Manindranath Bose Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Section 49, 11, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 139 and 149; Contract Act, 1872 - Section 56(1)(2), 65

license be transferred from Narkhed to Nagpur and, hence, applied to the Excise Commissioner in that regard. The Excise Commissioner, however, rejected the application for … business, the license lapsed and in the year 2005, it was re-validated and transferred in the name … of the power of the authorized officer to cancel or suspend the license on the conditions mentioned therein. Section 55 provides that the holder of the license would not be entitled to either compensation or refund of license … discussed about the nature of the privilege fees in the judgment reported in (1996)5 SCC 740 (State of Orissa & others Versus Narain Prasad & others), the Additional Government Pleader referred to the same. It is submitted … that period. The Court observed that Section 49 of The Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 did not empower the authorities to demand license fee for the

State Of Orrisa Vs. Premalata Mohapatra (dead) Thr. Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

August 1998. While making such provision for grant of land, Revenue & Excise Department in the aforesaid letters had requested Home Department for award of … Before this Court, the legal heir of the writ petitioner filed information obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005 on 7.8.2009, which is as under: “ 7 xx xx xx (b) Service particulars of the deceased soldier … (Singapore) (viii) Field Service with - 27 Feb 55 to 17 Dec ASC56(ix) Character - Exemplary (x) … NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6534-6535 OF2021STATE OF ORISSA & ORS. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PREMALATA MOHAPATRA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The challenge in the … RAMASUBRAMANIAN) NEW DELHI; OCTOBER29 2021. 9 ITEM NO.1 Court 11 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI-A S U P R E M E C O U R