Advanced Search Results

M/S. Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ltd. (supra), MIL India Ltd. (supra) and Sirpur Papers Mills Ltd. (supra) are the decisions under the Central Excise Act, 1944 which are really not of relevance as they relate to the concept, term and expression “manufacture” as … is no question of the dominant nature test applying. Therefore when in 2005 C.K. Jidheesh v. Union of India[40]. held that the aforesaid observations in … does not lay down the law correctly.9. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Orissa, has referred to the terms of the quotation, the confirmation letter, the letter of approval, the preparatory erection … with the operation of the lift. He has also placed reliance on Section 4 which deals with permission to erect a lift, Section 5 that … Respondents WITH Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 298/2005, 487/2005, 528/2005, 67/2006, 511/2006, 75/2007, 519/2008, 531/2008, 548/2008, 569/2008, 186/2009,

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

that a confession made to an Excise Inspector under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act of 1915, would be a confession made to a police … the NDPS Act, being a penal statute, is in contradistinction to the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Act, 1944, whose dominant object is 2 to protect the revenue of the State, and that therefore, judgments rendered … beyond fifteen days; section 37(1)(b), which contains additional conditions for the grant of bail in certain circumstances; and section 52 53A, which are exceptions engrafted upon statements made in writing under sections 161, 162 and 172 of the

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

scope of Entry 84 in List I which provides for levy of excise duty by Parliament, but within the scope of the expression tax on … 98-A of the Act is analogous to registered dealers under Section 9 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Therefore, there is no substance in the contention of the State that the petitioners, who are lessees have … and Development) Act, 1948 (Act 53 of 1946) with reference to Entry 52 in List I read with the Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951 … We find it difficult to accept the said contention. As observed by the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch, AIR 1964 SC 1284 by making a declaration under Section 2 and enacting Section 18

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

scope of Entry 84 in List I which provides for levy of excise duty by Parliament, but within the scope of the expression 'tax on … 98-A of the Act is analogous to registered dealers under Section 9 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Therefore, there is no substance in the contention of the State that the petitioners, who are lessees have … and Development) Act, 1948 (Act 53 of 1946) with reference to Entry 52 in List I read with the Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951 … We find it difficult to accept the said contention. As observed by the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v.-.:174. :- M.A.Tulloch, AIR1964SC1284by making a declaration under Section 2 and enacting Section 18 of the Central Act,

Radhey Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bihar Excise Act - Sections 22, 30 to 35, 40, 42, 44, 44(1), 89 and 90; Bihar Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 20; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1921; [2007(3)JCR85(Jhr)]

power to the Board to make Rules. The Board of Revenue has notified instructions under the Bihar & Orissa Excise Act. Chapter-III deals with the settlement and licenses. Rule 74 provides the term of license as one … Group-I vide application dated 27th February, 2006 in accordance with the provisions of Section 44 of the Bihar Excise Act. The surrender of license was sought on the ground indicated in its application, wherein, it was stated that … Group-II for the period commencing from 15th December, 2004 to 31st March, 2005. These licenses were granted pursuant to acceptance of bid of the petitioner.

M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

However, the duty levied under the ADE Act is over and above the duty levied under the Central Excise Act and to distinguish it from duties levied under the Central Excise Act popularly, known as additional duties of … in Chapter 24 of the 1985 Act, pan masala may or may not contain tobacco. 32. The Finance Act, 2005 (18 of 2005) substituted the First Schedule to the ADE Act with a new First Schedule that did … petitioners' advocate in two volumes of the compilation. 52. On the other hand, Mrs. Jeejeebhoy, learned special … 367 (Mad.) (11) K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo and Ors. v. State of Orissa 1954 SCR 1. (12) P. Vajravelu Mudaliar v. Spl. Deputy Collector for … Act, 1957. 31/01/2006 10. However, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 9(1) of the MVAT Act, 2002, the State Government of Maharashtra, vide

R.Prakash vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

for two years, after taking a lenient view.6. Thereafter the petitioner filed an application underthe Right to Information Act 2005 in the Excise Range Office, Anchal, on 26.05.2010 regarding his case and he was informed vide letter dated … S/O.SREEDHARAN,, SREEDHAR BHAVAN, PUTHENKAVUVILA,, MARANALLUUR VILLAGE,NEYYATTINKARA-695 512. 4 A.MUHAMMED RASHEED, S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN 52 YEARS,KAVUVILA VEEDU,ELEMPAZHANNUR, KADAKKAL VILLAGE,KOTTARAKKARA - 691 536 5 A.ANZAR, AGED 33 YEARS … relied on the judgments of the Apex Court in Smt. Nilabati Behera alias Lalita Behera v. State of Orissa and Others [1993 KHC 919], Nambi Narayanan S. v. Siby Mathews and Others [2018 (4) KHC 598], Shyam … An FIR was registered against him as Crime No.81/2004 on 20.04.2004, under Section 55(g) of the Abkari Act. The petitioner was a signatory to the

Anilkumar a.B. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

for two years, after taking a lenient view.6. Thereafter the petitioner filed an application underthe Right to Information Act 2005 in the Excise Range Office, Anchal, on 26.05.2010 regarding his case and he was informed vide letter dated … S/O.SREEDHARAN,, SREEDHAR BHAVAN, PUTHENKAVUVILA,, MARANALLUUR VILLAGE,NEYYATTINKARA-695 512. 4 A.MUHAMMED RASHEED, S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN 52 YEARS,KAVUVILA VEEDU,ELEMPAZHANNUR, KADAKKAL VILLAGE,KOTTARAKKARA - 691 536 5 A.ANZAR, AGED 33 YEARS … relied on the judgments of the Apex Court in Smt. Nilabati Behera alias Lalita Behera v. State of Orissa and Others [1993 KHC 919], Nambi Narayanan S. v. Siby Mathews and Others [2018 (4) KHC 598], Shyam … An FIR was registered against him as Crime No.81/2004 on 20.04.2004, under Section 55(g) of the Abkari Act. The petitioner was a signatory to the

Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi. Vs. M/S Hari Chand Shri Gop ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mill Ltd. etc. v. State of Kerala & Ors. (2007) 2 SCC 725, State of Orissa and others v. Tata Sponge Iron Ltd. (2007) 8 SCC 189, Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur v. Mewar … department was right in invoking the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 11(A)(1) of the Excise Act. This Court partly allowed the appeals holding that the department was not entitled to invoke the extended period … of central excise duty in contravention of the provisions of Rules 9(1), 52A, 53, 54, 173B, 173C, 173F and 226 of the Excise Rules.5. The

Jitendra S/O Manindranath Bose Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Section 49, 11, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 139 and 149; Contract Act, 1872 - Section 56(1)(2), 65

license be transferred from Narkhed to Nagpur and, hence, applied to the Excise Commissioner in that regard. The Excise Commissioner, however, rejected the application for … failed to carry on business, the license lapsed and in the year 2005, it was re-validated and transferred in the name of the petitioner. The … the grant of such right or privilege to that person by or on behalf of the State Government. Section 52 of the Act authorizes the authorized officers to grant licences, permits and passes and Section 53 stipulates that … discussed about the nature of the privilege fees in the judgment reported in (1996)5 SCC 740 (State of Orissa & others Versus Narain Prasad & others), the Additional Government Pleader referred to the same. It is submitted