Advanced Search Results

Bhimsen Sahu and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 2(8), 8, 8(2), 29(2), 89 and 89(2); Orissa Excise Rules, 1965 - Rules 32, 59 and 60

Reported in : 101(2006)CLT524

as the sole qualified/eligible applicant for the privilege in respect of out-still shops of Gopalpur.2. The Government of Orissa in Excise Department as per its policy for the year 2005-06 decided to grant exclusive privilege in respect … along with other districts for the remaining period with effect from 1.8.2005 (Annexure-1) under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Accordingly, the erstwhile Revenue & Excise Deptt. Notification No. 634-Ex-66/89 EX … Ray, Learned Senior Counsel, submitted that since efficacious remedy is available under Section 2(8) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act and Rule 60 of … of selection for granting exclusive privilege in favour of Opp. Party Nos. 5 & 6 and have approached the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court for

Ashok Kumar Majhi and Another. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act - Section 22, A 29(2)(a) Read With Rules 3, 4; Foreign Liquor Rules - Rule 3, I 3-A.

submitted that by way of _ an P amendment in the year 2005 i.e. on 29.3.2005 the State _ .V Government amended the Orissa Excise … objection dated 11.11.2009 under Annexure-3 did not satisfy the requirement of Section 22 of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 since the notice failed to specify the "loca1ity" and the "loca1 area" within i which the excise … is a block headquarters having floating population as about 4 p to 5 thousand per day. There is also no any kind of I.M.F.C. shops … the social workers and villagers of village Boden in the A District of Nuapada in the State of Orissa have prayed for quashing of i ' Notice No.248 dated 10.7.2010 issued by the Collector & Districtpetition and

PrawIn Kumar Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 107(2009)CLT385

transparency and making safe the huge Govt, revenue involved.As per provisions under Section-23 of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act 1915(1) a grantee of an exclusive privilege under Section 22 shall not let or assign the same or … licence Nos. 18/04/05 to 27/04-05 which had been renewed from 1st April, 2005 to 31st March, 2006 on deposit of consideration amount fixed by the … Sri Prawin Kumar entered into a partnership deed with one Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu of Titilagarh, Dist: Bolangir, Orissa on 1.5.05 declaring therein that he has already applied for addition of the name of Sri Rajesh Kumar

M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

However, the duty levied under the ADE Act is over and above the duty levied under the Central Excise Act and to distinguish it from duties levied under the Central Excise Act popularly, known as additional duties of … in Chapter 24 of the 1985 Act, pan masala may or may not contain tobacco. 32. The Finance Act, 2005 (18 of 2005) substituted the First Schedule to the ADE Act with a new First Schedule that did … Schedule A of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, is referable to the substantive provisions contained in section 5 of the MVAT Act. Section 5 states that subject to the other provisions of the MVAT Act and … 367 (Mad.) (11) K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo and Ors. v. State of Orissa 1954 SCR 1. (12) P. Vajravelu Mudaliar v. Spl. Deputy Collector for

Federation of Hotels and Restaurants Association of India and Others V ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

credit of duties or cess paid on any goods classifiable under Chapters 1 to 22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986). 17. These further changes by the Finance Act, 2012 have also been … Kerala v. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. (2016) 1 SCC 170, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Orissa High Court in Larsen and Toubro Ltd. v. State of Orissa (2008) 12 VST 31 to the effect … 226 of the Constitution of India is to the constitutional validity of Section 65 (105) (zzzzv) of the Finance Act 1994 (FA) whereby the provision

industrial Development Bank of India Ltd. and Others Vs. the Deputy Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

is not aware of the dues of IDBI and the auction was conducted in accordance with the Central Excise Act. The counter affidavit of the first respondent is silent on material facts. The Central Government Standing Counsel however … For better appreciation, we may sum up the pleadings in W.P.No.17742 of 2005 before noticing the short facts in each of the cases. Writ Petition … Ltd v Asst. Commissioner of Cus. and C.E., Hyderabad 1999 (106) ELT 296 (AP),S.K. Pattanaik v State of Orissa (2000) 1 SCC 413 : AIR 2000 SC 612,Allahabad Bank v Canara Bank (2000) 4 SCC 406 : … GoI Company IDBI is a public financial institution within the meaning of Section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956 (for brevity ‘the Companies Act’) Initially … petitions being W.P.Nos.10515 and 10516 of 2011 and 5993 of 2012 are filed by the Assistant Commissioner,

Swaraj Abhiyan Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

States that is Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, Odisha, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh. Drought or “semi-scarcity” has since been declared very recently … of the NDRF are drawn from the National Calamity Contingency Duty imposed on specified goods under the Central Excise Act and the Customs Act. In addition to this, the Government of India also releases funds for the NDRF.31. … under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Generation Scheme framed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (for short “the NREGA Act”). It has also prayed that food grains be made available as specified under … the drought situation or the drought-like situation. Background 5. The petitioner Swaraj Abhiyan has filed this public … affected by a possible drought-like situation usually belong to the most vulnerable sections of society. The sound of silence coming from these States subjects the

The Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 4(1), 6, 48, 4, 5; Constitution of India - Article 14

v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors., AIR 1981 SC 1636; and Eskayef Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, (1990) 4 SCC 680, this Court held that when discrimination is glaring, the State cannot take recourse to … are :A. That, a huge area of land admeasuring 607 Bighas and 5 Biswas situate in the revenue estate of villages Durgapura, Jhalan Chod, Sanganer … SC 1953; Dhurandhar Prasad Singh v. Jai Prakash University and Ors., AIR 2001 SC 2552; and Government of Orissa v. Ashok Transport Agency and Ors., (2002) 9 SCC 28).12. Even if the lands of other similarly situated … village Durgapura stood notified under Section 4(1) of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act’) on 18.7.1979, for a public

Present:- Mr. J.S. Brar Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

the basis of confessional statement made by the accused to Superintendent of Excise under provisions of Bihar and Orissa Excise Act. It was held to be inadmissible in evidence. It was not a confession of a co-accused … basis of confessional statement made by the accused to Superintendent of Excise under provisions of Bihar and Orissa Excise Act. It was held to be inadmissible in evidence. It was not a confession of a co-accused but confession … Monish H. Bhalla v. Satya Parkash Bahl alias S.P.Bahl alias S.P.And others 2005(3) RCR (Criminal) 766 where it is laid down that the accused cannot … Gurpreet Singh, the petitioners have brought this petition under the provisions of section 482 Cr.P.C.for quashing of FIR No.14 dated 12.01.2012 registered at Police Station … Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Abdul Rashid v. State of Bihar, AIR 200.Supreme Court 2422. The

G.Madhab Reddy. Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act - Section 47(a).

confirming judgment passed by the learned courts below convicting the petitioner under Section 47(a) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of … judgment passed by the learned courts below convicting the petitioner under Section 47(a) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in … him as aforesaid.4. The petitioner carried on appeal bearing Crl.Appeal No.23 of 2005(GDC) which was heard by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chhatrapur, who confirmed