Advanced Search Results

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

be a police officer. Then, the PMLA is distinguished from the 1962 Act, Sea Customs Act, 187826, Central Excise Act, 194427 and the CGST Act. The dissenting opinion of Subba Rao, J.in Barkat Ram28 is also relied upon. … to two investigations being conducted, one by a police officer and the other by the authorities specified under Section 48. An additional point has been raised that the difference between a complaint under the PMLA and a chargesheet … of the then Finance Minister on the Prevention of Money-Laundering (Amendment) Bill, 200534 in the Lok Sabha on 06.05.2005. However, it was also conceded that

The Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 4(1), 6, 48, 4, 5; Constitution of India - Article 14

Ors., AIR 1981 SC 1636; and Eskayef Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, (1990) 4 SCC 680, this Court held that when discrimination is glaring, … wanted to exempt the land, it would require a notification by the Government. Law provides a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (hereinafter called as `Act 1894’) or abandonment of the land acquisition proceedings … SC 1953; Dhurandhar Prasad Singh v. Jai Prakash University and Ors., AIR 2001 SC 2552; and Government of Orissa v. Ashok Transport Agency and Ors., (2002) 9 SCC 28).12. Even if the lands of other similarly situated

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

scope of Entry 84 in List I which provides for levy of excise duty by Parliament, but within the scope of the expression 'tax on … 98-A of the Act is analogous to registered dealers under Section 9 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Therefore, there is no substance in the contention of the State that the petitioners, who are lessees have … We find it difficult to accept the said contention. As observed by the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v.-.:174. :- M.A.Tulloch, AIR1964SC1284by making a declaration under Section 2 and enacting Section 18 of the Central Act, … inserting Entry 17-A dealing with forests in the Concurrent List, simultaneously, Article 48-A and Article 51-A (g) were also inserted, they being a Directive Principle

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

scope of Entry 84 in List I which provides for levy of excise duty by Parliament, but within the scope of the expression tax on … 98-A of the Act is analogous to registered dealers under Section 9 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Therefore, there is no substance in the contention of the State that the petitioners, who are lessees have … We find it difficult to accept the said contention. As observed by the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch, AIR 1964 SC 1284 by making a declaration under Section 2 and enacting Section 18 … inserting Entry 17-A dealing with forests in the Concurrent List, simultaneously, Article 48-A and Article 51-A (g) were also inserted, they being a Directive Principle

Swaraj Abhiyan Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

States that is Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, Odisha, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh. Drought or “semi-scarcity” has since been declared very recently … of the NDRF are drawn from the National Calamity Contingency Duty imposed on specified goods under the Central Excise Act and the Customs Act. In addition to this, the Government of India also releases funds for the NDRF.31. … under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Generation Scheme framed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (for short “the NREGA Act”). It has also prayed that food grains be made available as specified under … Mitigation Fund has not yet been constituted. There is, therefore, no provision for the mitigation of a disaster.32. Section 48 of the DM Act places a corresponding obligation on the State Governments to create response and mitigation funds

M/S. Bagalkot Nirmithi Kendra vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

C.R. BUILDING, NAVANAGAR HUBBALLI - 580 025.4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (AUDIT) CENTRAL EXCISE, AUDIT CIRCLE HUBBALLI - 580 025.5. THE UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT … an issuewhether the Nirmithi Kendra would be a ‘Government Entity’ under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The coordinate bench after considering the entire spectrum of the law, in the case of PIO & THE … as follows: “FINANCE SECRETARIAT NOTIFICATION (32/2017) No. FD 48 CSL 2017 Bengaluru, dated :13.10.2017In exercise of the … Union of India, WP (C) No. 17188 of 2015,order dated 5-2-2018 (Ori)] of the Patna High Courtand the Orissa High Court extending the benefit of the Exemption Notification to the educational institutions, and a fortiori, to SPCL.”(Emphasis … conductive with other objects and generating employment opportunities, particulary for the weaker sections of the Society.” The governing body of the petitioner comprises of 14

The State of Karnataka,. vs Sri Guruswamy,

Court : Karnataka

arbitrary, unconstitutional and ultra vires (erroneously referred to as intra vires in the prayer clause) of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 [the Excise Act] and the Rules framed thereunder. THE AMENDMENTS4. Before proceeding further, it is relevant to … exclusive privilege of manufacture and sale of liquor, and no citizen - 48 -has a fundamental right to carry on trade or business in liquor, … the State has the exclusive rights in matter of manufacture, distribution and sale of intoxicants. In State of Orissa v. Harinarayan Jaiswal9 the Supreme Court observed:“Public auctions are held to get the best possible price… The fact … ADVOCATE A/W SRI MOHAN MAHABALESHWARA BHAT, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

Rajasthan State Indst.Dev.Andinv.Corpn. Vs. Subhash Sindhi Coop.Hsg.So ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Pradesh and Ors., AIR 198.SC 1636.and Eskayef Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, (1990) 4 SCC 680.this Court held that when discrimination is glaring, the … wanted to exempt the land, it would require a notification by the Government. Law provides a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (hereinafter called as `Act 1894’) or abandonment of the land acquisition proceedings … & Ors., AIR 200.SC 1953.Dhurandhar Prasad Singh v. Jai Prakash University & Ors., AIR 200.SC 2552.and Government of Orissa v. Ashok Transport Agency & Ors., (2002) 9 SCC 28).12. Even if the lands of other similarly situated

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

it is one of the goods on which additional excise duty is leviable under the Additional Duties of Excise Act, 1957. This Court held that though sugar was a commodity on which no sales tax is leviable because … impeding the free flow of trade, commerce and intercourse.” (Id. at p.831) 48 The test, in the view of Chief Justice Sinha, is whether a … context the decisions in S K Madar Saheb v. State of AP[101].; Bolani Ores Ltd v. State of Orissa[102].; G. K. Krishnan v. State of TN[103].; International Tourist Corpn. v. State of Haryana[104].; Malwa Bus Service (P) … boundaries. In discarding the expression “among the states” (which is used in Section 92 of the Australian Constitution) and “among several states” (which is used

M/S. Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ltd. (supra), MIL India Ltd. (supra) and Sirpur Papers Mills Ltd. (supra) are the decisions under the Central Excise Act, 1944 which are really not of relevance as they relate to the concept, term and expression “manufacture” as … is no question of the dominant nature test applying. Therefore when in 2005 C.K. Jidheesh v. Union of India[40]. held that the aforesaid observations in … does not lay down the law correctly.9. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Orissa, has referred to the terms of the quotation, the confirmation letter, the letter of approval, the preparatory erection … with the operation of the lift. He has also placed reliance on Section 4 which deals with permission to erect a lift, Section 5 that … … Respondents WITH Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 298/2005, 487/2005, 528/2005, 67/2006, 511/2006, 75/2007, 519/2008, 531/2008, 548/2008, 569/2008,