Advanced Search Results

Swaraj Abhiyan Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

States that is Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, Odisha, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh. Drought or “semi-scarcity” has since been declared very recently … of the NDRF are drawn from the National Calamity Contingency Duty imposed on specified goods under the Central Excise Act and the Customs Act. In addition to this, the Government of India also releases funds for the NDRF.31. … under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Generation Scheme framed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (for short “the NREGA Act”). It has also prayed that food grains be made available as specified under … disaster situation or disaster. We have been informed that no such specialist Force has been constituted as yet.30. Section 46 of the DM Act provides for the establishment of a National Disaster Response Fund (for short “the NDRF”)

State of Kerala and Others Vs. fr.william Fernandez Etc Etc

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

attracts the duty, even though it may be collected later; and we may draw attention to the Sugar Excise Act in which it is specially provided that the duty is payable not only in respect of sugar which … order under Section 9C of the 1999 Act has been made by way of Orissa Entry Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005 which came into force with effect from 19.05.2005. The writ petition has been dismissed by the Division Bench … statutory provisions relating to entry tax applicable in the above mentioned States. 46. The Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as “Orissa Act, … are concerned only with entry tax legislations of States, namely, State of Orissa, State of Bihar, State of Kerala and State of Jharkhand, the relevant

M/s Trimurthi Fragrances (p) Ltd. Through Its Director Shri Pradeep Ku ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

at Sl. No.22 and that the expression (tobacco) refers to what is defined as such under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereafter “CEA”). Consequently, to ascertain "tobacco", one has to refer to the CEA read with Chapter 24 … 2404.50). The entry in relation to chewing tobacco was amended w.e.f. 1993-94. 46. By Finance Act, 1995, 'Pan Masala' was brought under the Heading 21.06. … Court that "gutkha" is "tobacco" and relied on Kothari Products Ltd. v. Government of A.P8 and State of Orissa v. Radheshyam Gudakhu Factory9. This court in Radheshyam Gudakhu Factory (supra), noted that "tobacco" in Section 2(c) of

M/s. Mascon Multiservices and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bharat Oman Re ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

S C 271 (Vol 42 C N 47) and Ascu Arch Timber Protection Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta, (2004) 10 Supreme Court Cases 653 in which it has been held that upon the surmises of … Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Rais Coastal Survey and Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. 2005 Law Suit (Bom) 311 to show that the Court interpreted the judgment … still further continued the engineer-in-charge may take action. 46. It is contended by the respondent that the … general law. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment in the case of Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Orissa and Ors. Vs. G. C. Roy AIR 1992 SC 732 in para 43 of which the claim for … challenged in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) essentially as being vitiated by bias and upon the

J. Pratap Reddy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 10, 13, 13(3), 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(4) and 14(5); Merchant Shipping Act, 1854 - Sections 374; Uttar Pradesh Muslims Waqfs Act, 1936 - Sections 5(2); Kerala Agriculturists Debt Relief Act, 1970 - Sections 4(1); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 46(7); Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 - Rule 14(1)

Reported in : 127(2006)DLT526; 2006(86)DRJ251

Ministry Employees Co-operative House Building Society Ltd, : [1991]3SCR839 (vide pages 2167-2168); and M.J. Exports Ltd. v. Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, : 1992(60)ELT161(SC) .25. Words may also be read to give effect to the … we propose to dispose off LPA Nos. 2244, 2506 and 2507 of 2005 which arise out of the impugned judgment of a learned single Judge … case is only an authority for what it decides. As observed by the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra : (1970)ILLJ662SC :-'A decision is only an authority for what it actually decides. What … Board, Secunderabad under the first proviso to Section 14(4) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') after the expiry of the … 'be reckoned' had been inadvertently omitted in section 46(7)(iv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and were

M/S. Visa Steel Limited, Bhubaneswar Vs. Commissioner, Central Excise, ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Land Acquisition

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK OTAPL No.02 of 2013 From order No.A-431/KOL/2012 dated 05.07.2012 passed by the learned Customs, Excise & Service … the assessment. Under sub-section (1) of Sec. 17 that after an importer has entered any imported goods under Section 46 or an exporter has entered any export goods under Section 50 the imported goods or the export goods, … J.The present appeal has been directed under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short, “the Act, 1962”.) against the order dated 05.07.2012 passed

The State of Karnataka,. vs Sri Guruswamy,

Court : Karnataka

arbitrary, unconstitutional and ultra vires (erroneously referred to as intra vires in the prayer clause) of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 [the Excise Act] and the Rules framed thereunder. THE AMENDMENTS4. Before proceeding further, it is relevant to … this Rule shall be issued.” The notification contained(2010) 5 SCC 186 - 46 - the following Explanatory Note to indicate the purpose of the amendment:“Government … the State has the exclusive rights in matter of manufacture, distribution and sale of intoxicants. In State of Orissa v. Harinarayan Jaiswal9 the Supreme Court observed:“Public auctions are held to get the best possible price… The fact … ADVOCATE A/W SRI MOHAN MAHABALESHWARA BHAT, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

it is one of the goods on which additional excise duty is leviable under the Additional Duties of Excise Act, 1957. This Court held that though sugar was a commodity on which no sales tax is leviable because … not have intended to include taxation within the ambit of the expression. 46 At the same time, Chief Justice Sinha rejected the ‘extreme proposition’ that … context the decisions in S K Madar Saheb v. State of AP[101].; Bolani Ores Ltd v. State of Orissa[102].; G. K. Krishnan v. State of TN[103].; International Tourist Corpn. v. State of Haryana[104].; Malwa Bus Service (P) … boundaries. In discarding the expression “among the states” (which is used in Section 92 of the Australian Constitution) and “among several states” (which is used

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Income Tax Act 1961 on the payment of bottling fees made to the State Government under the Rajasthan Excise Act 1950. Section 43-B(a) allowed a deduction in respect of any sum payable by the assessee by way of … 2002 With Civil Appeal No.5332 of 2002 With Civil Appeal No.1352 of 2005 With Civil Appeal No.1883 of 2006 With T.P. (Civil) No.722 of 2006 … to 45 in the State List enumerate the general entries and entries 46 to 63 provide for taxing entries. The legislature does not derive the … are spatially located in a few mineral rich states, namely, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, and West Bengal.11 Since mineral resources are a shared inheritance of the people, it has always been

M/S. Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ltd. (supra), MIL India Ltd. (supra) and Sirpur Papers Mills Ltd. (supra) are the decisions under the Central Excise Act, 1944 which are really not of relevance as they relate to the concept, term and expression “manufacture” as … is no question of the dominant nature test applying. Therefore when in 2005 C.K. Jidheesh v. Union of India[40]. held that the aforesaid observations in … does not lay down the law correctly.9. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Orissa, has referred to the terms of the quotation, the confirmation letter, the letter of approval, the preparatory erection … with the operation of the lift. He has also placed reliance on Section 4 which deals with permission to erect a lift, Section 5 that … 137/2011, 181/2011, 207/2011, 278/2011, 243/2011, 372/2011, 398/2011, 381/2011, 468/2011, 547/2011, 107/2012, 125/2012, 196/2012, 263/2012, 404/2012, 567/2012, 145/2013,