Advanced Search Results

PrawIn Kumar Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 107(2009)CLT385

transparency and making safe the huge Govt, revenue involved.As per provisions under Section-23 of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act 1915(1) a grantee of an exclusive privilege under Section 22 shall not let or assign the same or … licence Nos. 18/04/05 to 27/04-05 which had been renewed from 1st April, 2005 to 31st March, 2006 on deposit of consideration amount fixed by the … Sri Prawin Kumar entered into a partnership deed with one Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu of Titilagarh, Dist: Bolangir, Orissa on 1.5.05 declaring therein that he has already applied for addition of the name of Sri Rajesh Kumar

Radhey Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bihar Excise Act - Sections 22, 30 to 35, 40, 42, 44, 44(1), 89 and 90; Bihar Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 20; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1921; [2007(3)JCR85(Jhr)]

power to the Board to make Rules. The Board of Revenue has notified instructions under the Bihar & Orissa Excise Act. Chapter-III deals with the settlement and licenses. Rule 74 provides the term of license as one … Group-I vide application dated 27th February, 2006 in accordance with the provisions of Section 44 of the Bihar Excise Act. The surrender of license was sought on the ground indicated in its application, wherein, it was stated that … Group-II for the period commencing from 15th December, 2004 to 31st March, 2005. These licenses were granted pursuant to acceptance of bid of the petitioner. … the counter affidavit. Petitioner made specific allegations in paragraphs 18, 19, 20, 23 and 26 of the writ application and paragraphs 3 and 6 of

Ashok Kumar Majhi and Another. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Excise Act - Section 22, A 29(2)(a) Read With Rules 3, 4; Foreign Liquor Rules - Rule 3, I 3-A.

submitted that by way of _ an P amendment in the year 2005 i.e. on 29.3.2005 the State _ .V Government amended the Orissa Excise … objection dated 11.11.2009 under Annexure-3 did not satisfy the requirement of Section 22 of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act, 1915 since the notice failed to specify the "loca1ity" and the "loca1 area" within i which the excise … the social workers and villagers of village Boden in the A District of Nuapada in the State of Orissa have prayed for quashing of i ' Notice No.248 dated 10.7.2010 issued by the Collector & Districtpetition and … their upliftment. It further V submitted that by a further letter dated 23.12.2009, the Chairman of Boden Panchayat Samiti submitted another objection reiterating his `

Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi. Vs. M/S Hari Chand Shri Gop ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mill Ltd. etc. v. State of Kerala & Ors. (2007) 2 SCC 725, State of Orissa and others v. Tata Sponge Iron Ltd. (2007) 8 SCC 189, Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur v. Mewar … department was right in invoking the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 11(A)(1) of the Excise Act. This Court partly allowed the appeals holding that the department was not entitled to invoke the extended period … under Chapter Sub-heading no. 2404.49 (up to 22.7.1996) and, with effect from 23.7.1996, covered under Chapter Sub-heading no. 2404.40, packed the same in the containers

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 179, 181, 181(3) and 182; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23, 23(2) and 23(5); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 8; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Tariff for Retail Sale of Electricity) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2

Reported in : AIR2005Ori11

relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court in Collector of Central Excise v. New Tobacco Co., AIR 1998-SC 668, in which it has been … complied with before the Regulations were finally framed by the Commission. He also submitted that sub-section (5) of Section 23 of the Central General Clauses Act, 1897 provides that the publication in the Official Gazette of a rule … Act, 1860 with the object of protecting the right, interest and welfare of consumers in the State of Orissa. The petitioner No. 2 is, a consumer of electricity. The Grid Corporation of Orissa Limited (for short, 'GRIDCO')

State of Kerala and Others Vs. fr.william Fernandez Etc Etc

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

attracts the duty, even though it may be collected later; and we may draw attention to the Sugar Excise Act in which it is specially provided that the duty is payable not only in respect of sugar which … order under Section 9C of the 1999 Act has been made by way of Orissa Entry Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005 which came into force with effect from 19.05.2005. The writ petition has been dismissed by the Division Bench … are concerned only with entry tax legislations of States, namely, State of Orissa, State of Bihar, State of Kerala and State of Jharkhand, the relevant … Orissa at Cuttack. The transfer petition was allowed by this Court on 23.07.2013 on which this T.C. No.149 of 2013 has been registered. The petitioner

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

of 2:1 of this Court held that a confession made to an Excise Inspector under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act of 1915, would be a confession made to a police officer for the purpose of section … the NDPS Act, being a penal statute, is in contradistinction to the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Act, 1944, whose dominant object is 2 to protect the revenue of the State, and that therefore, judgments rendered … appellant when his statement(s) in question were recorded by the RPF officer.” 23 20.We now come to the judgment of this Court in Nandini Satpathy

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

be a police officer. Then, the PMLA is distinguished from the 1962 Act, Sea Customs Act, 187826, Central Excise Act, 194427 and the CGST Act. The dissenting opinion of Subba Rao, J.in Barkat Ram28 is also relied upon. … counsel also reminisces of the speech of the then Finance Minister on the Prevention of Money-Laundering (Amendment) Bill, 200534 in the Lok Sabha on 06.05.2005. However, it was also conceded that the amendment of Section 44(1)(b) of … Consideration • The 2002 Act 19-22 • Preamble of the 2002 Act 23-24 • Definition Clause 25-36 • Section 3 of the 2002 Act 37-55

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

scope of Entry 84 in List I which provides for levy of excise duty by Parliament, but within the scope of the expression 'tax on … 98-A of the Act is analogous to registered dealers under Section 9 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Therefore, there is no substance in the contention of the State that the petitioners, who are lessees have … in either of those Lists. List II - State List - Entry 23, 50, 54 23. Regulation of mines and mineral development subject to the … We find it difficult to accept the said contention. As observed by the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v.-.:174. :- M.A.Tulloch, AIR1964SC1284by making a declaration under Section 2 and enacting Section 18 of the Central Act,

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

scope of Entry 84 in List I which provides for levy of excise duty by Parliament, but within the scope of the expression tax on … 98-A of the Act is analogous to registered dealers under Section 9 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2005. Therefore, there is no substance in the contention of the State that the petitioners, who are lessees have … We find it difficult to accept the said contention. As observed by the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v. M.A. Tulloch, AIR 1964 SC 1284 by making a declaration under Section 2 and enacting Section 18 … proceedings thereto including direction issued by respondent no.1 to respondent no.2 dated: 23-08-2008 vide Annexure-B and the order dt: 12-9-2008 issued by R-4 vide Annexure-C