Advanced Search Results

M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

in Chapter 24 of the 1985 Act, pan masala may or may not contain tobacco. 32. The Finance Act, 2005 (18 of 2005) substituted the First Schedule to the ADE Act with a new First Schedule that did … 367 (Mad.) (11) K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo and Ors. v. State of Orissa 1954 SCR 1. (12) P. Vajravelu Mudaliar v. Spl. Deputy Collector for … However, the duty levied under the ADE Act is over and above the duty levied under the Central Excise Act and to distinguish it from duties levied under the Central Excise Act popularly, known as additional duties of

Radhey Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bihar Excise Act - Sections 22, 30 to 35, 40, 42, 44, 44(1), 89 and 90; Bihar Excise Act, 1915 - Sections 20; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1921; [2007(3)JCR85(Jhr)]

power to the Board to make Rules. The Board of Revenue has notified instructions under the Bihar & Orissa Excise Act. Chapter-III deals with the settlement and licenses. Rule 74 provides the term of license as one … Group-I vide application dated 27th February, 2006 in accordance with the provisions of Section 44 of the Bihar Excise Act. The surrender of license was sought on the ground indicated in its application, wherein, it was stated that … Group-II for the period commencing from 15th December, 2004 to 31st March, 2005. These licenses were granted pursuant to acceptance of bid of the petitioner. … Indian made Foreign Liquor etc., constituting Group-II for the period commencing from 15th December, 2004 to 31st March, 2005. These licenses were granted pursuant to

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

of 2:1 of this Court held that a confession made to an Excise Inspector under the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act of 1915, would be a confession made to a police officer for the purpose of section … the NDPS Act, being a penal statute, is in contradistinction to the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Act, 1944, whose dominant object is 2 to protect the revenue of the State, and that therefore, judgments rendered … and arrest, or else it would fall foul of the fundamental rights chapter of the Constitution. He argued that the NDPS Act was penal in

M/S. Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ltd. (supra), MIL India Ltd. (supra) and Sirpur Papers Mills Ltd. (supra) are the decisions under the Central Excise Act, 1944 which are really not of relevance as they relate to the concept, term and expression “manufacture” as … is no question of the dominant nature test applying. Therefore when in 2005 C.K. Jidheesh v. Union of India[40]. held that the aforesaid observations in … However, the definition of Taxable Service under sub-section 105(zzd) remained unaltered. .30. Chapter V under the caption ‘Service Tax’ of the ‘Finance Act’, 1994 underwent … does not lay down the law correctly.9. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Orissa, has referred to the terms of the quotation, the confirmation letter, the letter of approval, the preparatory erection … 528/2005, 67/2006, 511/2006, 75/2007, 519/2008, 531/2008, 548/2008, 569/2008, 186/2009, 23/2010, 62/2010, 232/2010, 279/2010, 377/2010, 112/2011, 137/2011, 181/2011,

M/s Trimurthi Fragrances (p) Ltd. Through Its Director Shri Pradeep Ku ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

at Sl. No.22 and that the expression (tobacco) refers to what is defined as such under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereafter “CEA”). Consequently, to ascertain "tobacco", one has to refer to the CEA read with Chapter 24 … 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL … Court that "gutkha" is "tobacco" and relied on Kothari Products Ltd. v. Government of A.P8 and State of Orissa v. Radheshyam Gudakhu Factory9. This court in Radheshyam Gudakhu Factory (supra), noted that "tobacco" in Section 2(c) of

Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi. Vs. M/S Hari Chand Shri Gop ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

its "intended use" and "substantial compliance" of the procedure set out in Chapter X of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (in short 'the Excise Rules").2. … A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mill Ltd. etc. v. State of Kerala & Ors. (2007) 2 SCC 725, State of Orissa and others v. Tata Sponge Iron Ltd. (2007) 8 SCC 189, Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur v. Mewar … department was right in invoking the extended period of limitation under the proviso to Section 11(A)(1) of the Excise Act. This Court partly allowed the appeals holding that the department was not entitled to invoke the extended period

industrial Development Bank of India Ltd. and Others Vs. the Deputy Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ltd v Asst. Commissioner of Cus. and C.E., Hyderabad 1999 (106) ELT 296 (AP),S.K. Pattanaik v State of Orissa (2000) 1 SCC 413 : AIR 2000 SC 612,Allahabad Bank v Canara Bank (2000) 4 SCC 406 : … is not aware of the dues of IDBI and the auction was conducted in accordance with the Central Excise Act. The counter affidavit of the first respondent is silent on material facts. The Central Government Standing Counsel however … For better appreciation, we may sum up the pleadings in W.P.No.17742 of 2005 before noticing the short facts in each of the cases. Writ Petition … vi) procedure relating to offences and appeals. These are dealt with in Chapters V, X, IX XVI, XIV and XV of the Customs Act, respectively.

Sarat Chandra Panda Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 105(2008)CLT428

district, Notice No. 378, dated 7.3.2007 issued by the Collector, Mayurbhanj, under Section 26-A of the Bihar & Orissa Excise Act (herein after referred to as the 'Act') and Public Notice in Form 'A' for grant of … Notice No. 378, dated 7.3.2007 issued by the Collector, Mayurbhanj, under Section 26-A of the Bihar & Orissa Excise Act (herein after referred to as the 'Act') and Public Notice in Form 'A' for grant of IMFL 'OFF' … on grant of licence or exclusive privilege-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Chapter or elsewhere in this Act, in the Scheduled Area-(a) In no case … for operating an IMFL 'OFF' shop at village Pedagadi for the year 2005-06, but because of public agitation and law and order problem, said Opposite

Nabha Power Limited versus Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1308

referred to.List of Acts Electricity Act, 2003; Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Act, 1944.List of Keywords Deemed export benefits; Foreign Trade Policy; Bid; Cut-off date; Notifications by Directorate General of Foreign … the submissions moved by the Appellants, it is pertinent to refer to Chapter 8 of the FTP, which reads as follows:“8.1 Deemed Exports ‘Deemed Exports’ … Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras [2008] 15 SCR 1122 : (2008) 17 SCC 385; Commissioner of Income Tax, Orissa and Others v. M/s N.C. Budharaja and Company and Others [1993] Supp. 2 SCR 185 : (1994) Supp.

International Spirits and Wines Association of India Vs. The State of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Haryana Liquor License (Amendment) Rules 2017), (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’) as being ultra vires the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), is in appeal before this Court. The amended Rule provides for … be granted to a particular licensee in respect of particular premises/area.” 9. Chapter D of the Punjab Intoxicants License and Sales Orders, 1956 (hereinafter referred … the restrictions applicable to the State cease to apply. Reliance was placed on Akadasi Padhan vs. State of Orissa, AIR1963SC1047 to contend that if a monopoly is created by the State in its favour, the same cannot … in Maninderjit Singh Bitta v. Union of India and others reported in 2005(1)SCC679 In this case undoubtedly the rule provided that there will be only