Advanced Search Results

Jefin Abraham vs the Joint Regional Transport Officer

Court : Kerala

Matched in: Court Kerala

Narmada Bachao Andolan. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 4 ; Rehabilitation Policy - Sections 1.1, 3.2(a)(b)(c), 3.3, 5.15, 5.4, 2.3, 7.1 ; General Clauses Act - Section 21 ; Constitution of India - Articles 166, 14, 21, 166(1), 166(2), 166(3) ;

and rural abadi land to be acquired for the project, the price of similar land in the adjacent command areas will be taken as the basis. For assessing the value of urban abadi and other lands, the average … Valley Development Department, GOMP dated 7.06.91 relating to amendment of Para 5.1 of the approved Rehabilitation & … the Government. In this connection, reliance has been placed in State of Kerala v. A.Lakshmi Kutty, AIR 1987 SC 331, J.B. Bansal v. State of … Grievance Redressal Authority to all the on- going projects of Narmada Valley Development Authority (in short 'NVDA') except Sardar Sarovar Project. Between the period from … State Government under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Out of remaining land, the land admeasuring … to be done1. Allotment of agricultural Number of land-holder land to land-holders as per families who are losing section 3.2 of the R&R; more than 25% - 702 100% policy Not a single oustee allotted or offered agricultural

M.P.Chothy vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

respondent - State of Kerala, Joint Secretary, SC/ST Development Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram,, has filed a counter … Tribes on their visit to Kerala during September, 2000, had recommended the State Government to set up … India, the State is not vested with the powers to enact any law on the subject as contained the Kerala State SC/ST Commission Act, 2007 and the rules framed thereunder.4. Petitioner has further contended that since it was … better implementation of the provision of this Act;(vii) the identification of the areas where the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes are … priority basis.38. It is further contended that Section 14(3) of the Scheduled Castesand Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015 (No.1 of 2016) contains necessary safeguards to ensure speedy trial of cases relating to atrocities against the … petition has been filed for the following reliefs:A) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order or direction to the State Government,

Rail Vihar Kalyan Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd. and anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. Stat ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act 1965; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(6), 29, 38(2), 47A, 62 and 64; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54, 105 and 108; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 7 and 14; Indian Contract Act

Reported in : AIR2005All86; 2005(1)AWC682

v. Cochin International Airport Ltd., : [2000]1SCR505 , World Tel Inc. v. Union of India : 2000(122)ELT643(SC) ; Kerala SEB v. Kurien E. Kalathil : AIR2000SC2573 ; State of Rajasthan v. Anil Kumar Sunil Kumar & Party, … terms and conditions of the lease deed. The provisions of U.P. Industrial Area Development Act 1976 and the Rules/Regulations framed under the Act or any … execute 'the tripartite sale deed of super structure of the plots and sub-lease deed of the land', and commanding them not to take any coercive methods. They have also prayed for a direction, to CGEWHO to give … The petitioner has prayed for a direction to NOIDA and IRWO to amend the lease deed for the land dated 15-2-2000 and from restraining respondents … issued by Additional Chief Executive Officer, NOIDA dated 13-11-2002 and 7-1-2003 by which the NOIDA has directed … by the petitioner has referred the matter under Section 33 to the District Magistrate Gautam Budh Nagar … Rail Vihar Kalyan Samiti Limited Rail Vihar, Sector 33. NOIDA. District Gautam Nagar v. State of U.P.

Janasamparka Samithy vs Chennam Pallippuram Grama Panchayat

Court : Kerala

Matched in: Court Kerala

S. Nagaraj (Dead) by Lrs. and ors. Vs. B.R. Vasudeva Murthy and ors. E ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Mysore (Personal and Miscellaneous) Inam Abolition Act, 1954 - Sections 1(4), 3(1), 9, 10 and 10(3); Karnataka Inam Abolition Laws (Amendment Act), 1979; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48, 63(7), 79A, 79B, 80 and 81; Contract Act - Sections 23; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Registration Act - Sections 17; Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 32(5), 38A, 38A(2) and 65; Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 95, 95(2), 95(7) and 179; Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlement) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11; Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 20 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 46 and 141

Reported in : 2010(2)SCALE232

: (1988) 2 SCC 580 and Kunhayammed and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Anr. : (2000) 6 SCC 359.17. Mr. Dave submitted that in … representatives of the Inamdars (the appellants in Civil Appeal No. 3038 of 2007), referred to Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Inam Abolition Act which states the consequences of a notification under Sub-section (4) of Section 1 … construction of houses and for which the Bangalore Development Authority has sanctioned a lay out plan. The … the Principal Munsif, Bangalore, dismissed the suit as not pressed.6. In the meanwhile, the Karnataka Inam Abolition Laws (Amendment Act) 1979 amended the Inam Abolition Act providing that the Tribunal constituted under Section 48 of the Karnataka Land … it was absolved of its obligation to carry out the writ of mandamus issued by the Court because of the provisions of an amending Act … the BDA to sell or dispose of any area reserved for public parks and playgrounds and civic

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 10; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 - Rule 21(9)

Reported in : [2006]144STC409(Ker)

necessary plant and machinery prior to January 1, 2000. It claims to have taken the notified effective … or inter-State ; Sub-clause (iii) not relevant ; hence not extracted.(b) in respect of the surcharge payable under Section 3 of the Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act, 1957 (Act 11 of 1957) in relation to the goods referred … industrial unit by investing approximately Rs. 50 crores at the Industrial Development Area at Kanjikode in Palakkad District and had commenced commercial production of soft … sales tax exemption (exhibit P8). The application was rejected. By way of amendment of the writ petition, the following reliefs are also sought for.(iv)(a) To … notifications for claiming the benefit of sales tax exemptions envisaged in the said notifications.(iv) Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to forthwith grant an eligibility certificate to

Bangalore Development Authority and ors. Vs. R. Hanumaiah and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 - Sections 3, 18, 27A, 28, 29 and 38C; Mysore Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 50(2); Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 38, 65, 76(3) and 158; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Bangalore Development Authorities (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 5, 9, 13, 38, 38C and 65; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 4; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 4B; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 11, 17(1), 31 and 48; Land Acquisition (Karnataka Extension and Amendment) Act, 1961; Karnataka Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Bangalore Development Authority Rules - Rules 3 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 166 and 226; C

Reported in : AIR2005SC3631; JT2005(12)SC64; 2005(6)KarLJ161; 2005(8)SCALE80; (2005)12SCC508

aside. 20. State of Karnataka amended the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 by the Bangalore Development Authorities (3rd Amendment) Act, 1993 (for short 'the Amendment Act') which came into force with effect from 31st March, 1994. Section 5 … function by resort to the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Vide State of Kerala v. Gwalior Rayon Silk ., : [1974]1SCR671 .'31. In A. P. Pollution … any work for improvement or development of any area in or around the city of Bangalore. The … of land2. The City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 was enacted by the then Government of Mysore. Under Section 3 of the said Act a Board of Trustees was constituted to implement the purposes of the Act. The … provisions of a statute form part of the statute. (See General Officer Commanding-in- Chief v. Dr. Subhash Chandra Yadav, 1988 (2) SCC35, para 14). In … Control Board II v. Prof. M.V. Nayudu, : 2000(3)SCALE354 , STO v. Shree Durga Oil Mills, : … Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No.727 of 1989 wherein and whereunder the Division Bench while setting

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 10; Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act; State Financial Corporations Act

Reported in : (2009)20VST433(Ker)

for medium and large scale industries assisted by the Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation or the Kerala Financial Corporation will be issued by the Corporation … manufacturing other goods for sale within the State or inter-State (b) in respect of the surcharge payable under Section 3 of the Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act, 1957. Clause 10 of exhibit P1 notification enumerates the conditions and … into account the capital investment made by the unit. There are certain areas of expenditure which would not qualify for tax exemption. Those would therefore … concerned, would not have arisen but for the amendment of S.R.O. No. 1729 of 1993 by S.R.O. … 1999 and modified by S.R.O. No. 295 of 2000. Though S.R.O. No. 1729 of 1993 has been … an appellate authority in relation to the Director of Industries, to decide the question of eligibility afresh. A mandamus was issued to the fourth respondent in exhibit P2 See [2006] 144 STC 409 (Ker) judgment to consider … of sales tax in terms of S.R.O. No. 1729 of 1993 as amended by S.R.O. No. 1092

Cherupuzha Grama Panchayath vs Single Window Clearance Board

Court : Kerala

Matched in: Court Kerala