Advanced Search Results

Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Karnal Co-operative Sugar Mills

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)99TTJ(Delhi)330

the Revenue against the order of the learned CIT(A), dt. 17th Feb., 2000, for the asst. yr. 1995-96. Shri S.K. Gupta represented the Department, whereas … to be levied. We also find that Section 80P was inserted w.e.f. 1st April, 1968, in place of Section 81, earlier in operation. The assessee-society had been declaring and the assessee-society had not been making any claim under … appeal to challenge cancellation of penalty of Rs. 40 lakhs levied by the AO under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act.3. The learned Counsel for the assessee, Shri Ved Jain, raised a preliminary legal ground to support the order

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant/petitioner approached this Court for declaring that Section 70 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is unconstitutional and unenforceable and also for issuance of a writ of … regard to Information Technology Act and its provisions. The provisions of the same will be binding especially considering Section 81 of the Act which provides as follows:81. Act to have overriding effect. The provisions of this Act shall … on which Government is confirmed copyright under Section 17 (d). The learned single Judge held as follows:.Therefore while the IT Act deals with all matters pertaining to information technology, copyright in respect of information technology has to be considered

Punjab State Industrial Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)292ITR268(Chd.)

Bench is constituted mainly for deciding the common issue relating to computation of deduction under Section 80M of the IT Act, 1961. Three appeals have been filed by the assessee for asst. yrs.1994-95, 1995-96 and 1997-98. The appeal of … of the case, the finding of the Tribunal that the case of the assessee is covered by Section 81(i)(d) only and the provisions of Section 66 r/w Section 110 of the Act are not attracted is erroneous

Vodafone India Limited Vs. M/S. R.K. Productions Pvt. Ltd and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(5)LW626

of the various websites. The constitutional right of ISPs cannot be violated and their obligation arise only under the IT Act, 2000. Under Section 79, if an ISP is specifically informed of the link within a website which is violative … parties. 25. Section 79 of the IT Act is not applicable in the instant case in view of Section 81 of the IT Act. The Delhi High Court in Super Cassette Industries Ltd.'s case (cited supra) has held

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

expression "third party information" means any information dealt with by an intermediary in his capacity as an intermediary." Section 81 of IT Act, 2000 reads as under : Act to have overriding effect.- The provisions of this Act … Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said

Rajesh Rameshchandra Sharma vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … doctrine of the right to be forgotten do not fall within the statutory scope of Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000.91. The respondent further submits that the framework governingintermediary liability is provided under Section 79 of the IT Act,

Dr. Ishwarprasad Gilada vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … doctrine of the right to be forgotten do not fall within the statutory scope of Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000.91. The respondent further submits that the framework governingintermediary liability is provided under Section 79 of the IT Act,

Sanjeev Sehgal vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … doctrine of the right to be forgotten do not fall within the statutory scope of Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000.91. The respondent further submits that the framework governingintermediary liability is provided under Section 79 of the IT Act,

Shaktinidhi Bakhshi vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … doctrine of the right to be forgotten do not fall within the statutory scope of Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000.91. The respondent further submits that the framework governingintermediary liability is provided under Section 79 of the IT Act,

Ashok Kumar Singh vs Union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

of 144107. The respondent further submits that the statutory frameworkgoverning intermediary liability has overriding effect by virtue of Section 81 of the IT Act, 2000, thereby limiting the circumstances in which intermediaries may be held liable for third … doctrine of the right to be forgotten do not fall within the statutory scope of Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000.91. The respondent further submits that the framework governingintermediary liability is provided under Section 79 of the IT Act,