Advanced Search Results

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said

Sanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116

Reported in : 2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;

& 37 & Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987, Schedule I & Information Technology Act (21 of 2000), Section 79; Grant of Bail - Accused who has hosted websites providing third party data charged under Sections 24 &

Nirmaljit Singh Narula Vs. Indijobs at Hubpages.Com and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of Section 2(1) (w) and Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Under Section 79 (3)(b) of the IT Act,2000, defendant No.2 is under an obligation to remove unlawful content if it receives actual notice from the affected

Tata Sky Ltd Vs. Youtube Llc and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

forms relevant to each category. 20. YouTube's defence is on the following lines: (a) Being an intermediary under the IT Act, is statutorily exempt under Section 79 from liability in respect of any third party video uploaded on the … bound to protect. Please be advised that this is an offence under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 107 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. 9. .. Therefore, you are required to

Nirmaljit Singh Narula Vs. Sh. Yashwant Singh and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

articles and comments posted therein in compliance with the IT (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011 and Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000. Counsel further submits that these defendants are not entitled to any kind of exemptions as they themselves are

Sri. Chandrashekar B vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.69/2025 OF CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 67 AND 66(C) OF THE IT ACT, 2000 AND U/S 351(3), 352, 75(3), 79 R/W SECTION 3(5) OF THE BNS 2023, PENDING ON THE FILE OF

M Moser Design Associates India Pvt Ltd vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

a competent Court.It is submitted that Proton Mail has not been blocked in India under Section 69A of IT Act, 2000 and is operating in India.” (Emphasis added)The communication is from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government … actions of the certain unknown accusedpersons clearly disclose commission of several cognizable offences inter alia under Sections 75, 79, 356 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ("BNS") and Sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act,

R. D. Chaitra vs Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Karnataka

Veerendra, the main accused in FIR No.Police Station under Sections 420 of IPC 1860, 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000, 79 and 80 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963, and FIR No. 215/2022 dated 24.10.2022 registered at Davenagere Extension … COUNSEL) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF THE B.N.S.S., PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ARREST OF THE ACCUSED NO.1 PURSUANT TO THE ISSUANCE

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability

Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs. Sri. C. Kenchappa and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 47, 48A, 51A and 226; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Act, 1966 - Sections 3(1), 28, 28(1), 31 and 47; Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966; Town Planning Act

Reported in : AIR2006SC2038; 2006(4)ALD84(SC); [2006(3)JCR319(SC)]; JT2006(5)SC556; 2006(4)KarLJ545; 2006(6)SCALE1; (2006)6SCC371

& 37 & Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987, Schedule I & Information Technology Act (21 of 2000), Section 79; Grant of Bail - Accused who has hosted websites providing third party data charged under Sections 24 &