Advanced Search Results

K. Ramajayam @ Appu Vs. The Inspector of Police, T-4, Maduravoyal Poli ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

3, Section 25, Section 114, Section 45, Section 45A, section 76, Section 62, Section 65B - Information Technology Act, 2000- Section 2, Section 2(t), Section 2, Section 79A - Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - burglary and murder €“

Smt Shaila Chebbi Govind Vs. The State of Karnataka By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

66 (B) , 71 , 73 and 74 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IT Act, 2000’, for brevity) and Sections 465, 468, 469, 471, 474, 476 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal … Chebbi, Mala Srinivas Gowda, Abhay Chebbi and Prakash 38 Budoor. They have challenged the complaint and FIR in 76/2016, before the Anekal Police Station, filed against the petitioners by Madhukar Angur - alleging offences punishable under Sections

Shaila Chebbi Govind and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka by The Prin ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Sections 65, 66 (B), 71, 73 and 74 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the IT Act, 2000 , for brevity) and Sections 465, 468, 469, 471, 474, 476 read with Section 34 of the Indian … Shaila Chebbi, Mala Srinivas Gowda, Abhay Chebbi and Prakash Budoor. They have challenged the complaint and FIR in 76/2016, before the Anekal Police Station, filed against the petitioners by Madhukar Angur - alleging offences punishable under Sections

Swami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Rules are relevant. The same are extracted below: CS (OS) 27/2019 Page 63 of 76 The Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 2(j) ―computer network means the interconnection of one or more computers through- (i) the use of satellite, microwave,

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1. the Director General of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

offences under Sections 66 B, 66 E, 72, 72 A r/w. 76 and 77 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 109, 379, 403, 420, 468, 470, 471 along with 120 (b) of IPC. The intellectual property … the statement given by the writ petitioner would not make out an offence under the above said provisions.22. Section 76 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 deals with Confiscation of the computer, computer system, floppies, compact disks, tape

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

only one ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89,

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the statement given by the writ appellant would not make out an offence under the above said provisions.19. Section 76 of the Information technology Act 2000 deals with Confiscation of the computer, computer system, floppies, compact disks, tape … in the complaint and his statement would not make out an offence u/s 66B of the Information technology Act 2000. Section 66E of the Information technology Act 2000 deals with punishment for violation of privacy. Whoever, intentionally or knowingly

Shamraj Moorjani Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Hyd.)927

been filed by the assessees directed against separate but identical orders of the CIT(A)-II, Hyderabad, dt. 27th Oct., 2000, IT(SS)A No. 31/Hyd/2000 is filed by a partnership firm consisting of three partners. The appellants in all the … had not paid the taxes as per the admitted income, by invoking the provisions of Section 249(4)(a) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case are as follows.3. Shri Shamraj Moorjani, Shri Devraj Moorjani and Shri Vishnukumar … case of Bharat Kumar Saksaria v. Dy. CIT (2002) 77 TTJ (Mumbai) 769 : (2002) 82 ITD 512 (Mumbai), which is in favour of the

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. CochIn Malabar Estates and

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Coch.)434

No. 177/Coch/2003), the CIT(A) has held as under: The AO issued notice under Section 148 on 2nd March, 2000 for the similar reasons as in the asst. yr. 1987-88. The AO thereafter completed the assessment under Section … 1. The order of the CIT(A) in ITA Nos. 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 and 78/DC/R-1/CIT-II/2002-03 dt. 16th Dec., 2002 is opposed to law, weight … return of income for the asst. yrs.1987-88, 1988-89, 1989-90, 1990-91, 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1993-94 under Section 139 of the IT Act on different dates. The assessments of the assessee were completed initially under Section 143(3), but subsequently proceedings were

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Enron Oil and Gas India Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(Uttranchal)411

and no loss was incurred by the company/assessee ?In IT Appeal No. 76 of 2007-Whether, Tribunal erred in law in upholding the decision of CIT(A) … facts and circumstances of the case, in allowing foreign exchange loss of Rs. 11,58,44,887 under Section 42 of the IT Act, 1961, without appreciating the fact that the loss is only a book entry and no loss was incurred … New Delhi, in ITA No. 1821/2005; ITA No. 1823/2005 and ITA No. 1824/2005, relating to asst. yrs. 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 1998-99, respectively, whereby the depreciation on account of foreign exchange loss allowed to the assessee by the