Advanced Search Results

M.S. Venu S/O Late M.V. Subrahmanian Vs. the State of Karnataka by the ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67, 67A and 74; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 417, 420, 465, 467 and 471

420, 417, 465, 471, 467 of IPC and also under Sections 74, 67 & 67A of Information Technology Act, 2000. The said crime came to be registered for the said offences on the basis of the complaint filed … said case.2. The said FIR came to be issued against the present petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 417, 465, 471, 467 of IPC and also under Sections 74, 67 & 67A of Information Technology

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

measures. CIDR being a computer resource is notified to be a “Protected System” under Section 70 of the IT Act, 2000 by the Central Government on 11.12.2015. Anyone trying to unlawfully gain access into this system is liable to … ground that there was not an adequate level of safeguard to protect the data. It held that the 74 2.03. 2010, 1 BvR256/ 08 , 1 BvR263/ 08 , 1 BvR586/ 08 75 [2016]. 2 W.L.R. 873

N. Satish and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Princi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

5 (2) of the Aggregator Rules makes it mandatory that an Aggregator "shall comply with the Information Technology Act, 2000, including the intermediary guidelines." Thirdly, the virtual world of Information Technology gives the aggregator access to not only … frame rules "for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of this Chapter." Since Chapter V includes Section 74 of the Act, therefore, the State can also make rules with regard to the owner of the taxi

Satish N Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

5 (2) of the Aggregator Rules makes it mandatory that an Aggregator "shall comply with the Information Technology Act, 2000, including the intermediary guidelines." Thirdly, the virtual world of Information Technology gives the aggregator access to not only … including the principal or the permit holder, then such an interpretation would make the grant of permit under Section 74 of the Act as redundant. Further, the Act could not have envisaged that a permit holder is first

Om Prakash Sharma Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(JP.)246

income-tax computed in accordance with Section 113. But this First Schedule is subject to Section 2 of Finance Act, 2000. Section 2 of the Finance Act provides that the rates specified in Part I of the First Schedule are

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. CochIn Malabar Estates and

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Coch.)434

No. 177/Coch/2003), the CIT(A) has held as under: The AO issued notice under Section 148 on 2nd March, 2000 for the similar reasons as in the asst. yr. 1987-88. The AO thereafter completed the assessment under Section … the appeals: 1. The order of the CIT(A) in ITA Nos. 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 and 78/DC/R-1/CIT-II/2002-03 dt. 16th Dec., 2002 is opposed to … return of income for the asst. yrs.1987-88, 1988-89, 1989-90, 1990-91, 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1993-94 under Section 139 of the IT Act on different dates. The assessments of the assessee were completed initially under Section 143(3), but subsequently proceedings were

Parkar Securities Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)102TTJ(Ahd.)235

an appeal filed by the assessee and it is directed against the order of CIT(A), dt. 19th Sept., 2000 for asst. yr. 1997-98.2. Grounds of appeal attached with Form No. 36 are lengthy and narrative. However, at … the assessees. decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The question that arose was under Section 43(5) of the IT Act. The Bench found that the transaction in question could not be held to be a speculative transaction and,

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(17); Parliament Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154; Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … countersigned by the CAG. The CAG's report, according to Mr. Pathak, is a public document as defined in Section 74 of the Evidence Act read with Section 2(17)(g) and (h) of the Civil Procedure Code, the CAG's report

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; ;Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 2(17); ;Parliament Act; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 2(1); ;Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Section 26; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 154; ;Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; ;Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Gau)318,[2005]275ITR502(Gauhati)

of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … countersigned by the CAG. The CAG's report, according to Mr. Pathak, is a public document as defined in Section 74 of the Evidence Act read with Section 2(17)(g) and (h) of the Civil Procedure Code, the CAG's report

Fatima Riswana Vs. State Rep. by A.C.P., Chennai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 6; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 6; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 306, 366, 376 and 506

Reported in : AIR2005SC712; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)589; 2005CriLJ900; 116(2005)DLT382; [2005(1)JCR209(SC)]; 2005(1)JKJ1[SC]; JT2005(1)SC425; 2005(1)KLT502(SC); RLW2005(3)SC409; (2005)1SCC582

respondents 2 to 6 are the accused facing trial for offences punishable under Section 67 of Information Technology Act, 2000 r/w Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, Under Section 5 & 6 of Immoral … the accused against the orders made by the said court rejecting their applications for supply of copies of 74 Compact Discs (CDs) containing pornographic material on which the prosecution was relying. The said revision petitions were rejected