Advanced Search Results

Radiological and Imaging Association Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Rules, 2003 ; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 17, Section 4 and Rule 9; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and Rules, 1996 - Section 30, 32 rw 30, 29, 4(2)(3), 72-A, Rule 12; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 72, 5, 6, 23(2), 72 and 72 A ; Amendment Act of 2003 - Section 17(4); Evidence Act - Section 45

breach of confidentiality and privacy and therefore, constitute an offence punishable under section 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 14. On the other hand, Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned counsel for the Collector and District Magistrate, Kolhapur, Mr. V.D.

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

altering the charges and as the act constituting the offences punishable under Sections 66, 70 and 72 of IT Act 2000 are arising out of the single incident of publication of transcript of audio conversation in electronic media, the … and diminished the value of information, utility and affected it injuriously and thus have committed an offence under section 72 of the Information Technology Act. 6.The petitioner sought for the alteration of the charges on the following grounds:

Bangalore Mahanagara Nagareeka Kriyasamithi Vs. Bangalore Mahanagara P ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 57, 72, 103, 104, 108, 109 and 148; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 265; Patna Municipal Corporations Act, 1952 - Sections 130(1); Information Technology Act, 2000

Reported in : ILR2000KAR3772; 2001(3)KarLJ123

accountability, which has now been made legally feasible with the statutory recognition of e-governance under the Information Technology Act, 2000 enacted by the Parliament,Reg: Maintainability of writ petition27. As noticed above, the petitioner claims itself to be an … disbursements and all progress reports and pass such resolution thereon, as it thinks fit'. 18. We find that Section 72 of the Act casts an obligation on the other Municipal Authorities including the Commissioner to carry out the

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Nakodar Co-operative Sugar Mills

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)98TTJ(Asr.)337

under Section 80B(5), brought forward business losses of the earlier years are required to be set off under Section 72 of the Act, before allowing deduction under Section 80P.Provisions of Section 80P are similar to the provisions of … learned CIT(A) was not justified in allowing the claim of the assessee for deduction under Section 80-I of the IT Act, 1961 (in short the "Act"), in respect of profits and gains computed by the AO after adjusting brought … 5th Nov., 2003) of the CIT(A), Jalandhar, for the asst. yrs.1994-95 and 2000-01. Since both the appeals relating to the same assessee were filed by

Wipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211

Blo- STPIB/Wipro 19-12-1998 1999-2000 1999-2000City I -ck I & VI, Plot No. 72 Systems/Expan/ & 73, KEOICS Electronic 98071601/2496 --Electronic City, Blo- STPIB/Wipro 16-7-1998 1999-2000 … filed along with the return, it is seen that the assessee-company has claimed exemption under Section 10A of the IT Act in respect of income from Software Technology Parks (STPs), Electronic Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs), etc. to the extent … Systems Division, STPK/G175/97- 18-11-1997 1999-2000 1999-2000Chennai 111, Mount Road, 98/2761 Guindy, Chennai-600Pune Wipro Ltd., CTS, 685/2B STP/P/VIII(A) 10-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Gurgaon Wipro Ltd., Flat No.201, PCMG/PSE/5 19-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Mysore -- -- -- 2000-01 2000-01__________________________________________________________________________________________ was filed by the

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1. the Director General of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

offences under Sections 66 B, 66 E, 72, 72 A r/w. 76 and 77 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 109, 379, 403, 420, 468, 470, 471 along with 120 (b) of IPC. The intellectual property … and the statements would not attract an offence under Section 66 E of the Information Technology Act, 2000.19. Section 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 deals with 'Penalty for breach of confidentiality and privacy' ?. Save as

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

complaint and the statements would not attract an offence under section 66E of the Information technology Act 2000.18. Section 72 of the Information Technology Act 2000 deals with penalty for breach of confidentiality and privacy. If any person … in the complaint and his statement would not make out an offence u/s 66B of the Information technology Act 2000. Section 66E of the Information technology Act 2000 deals with punishment for violation of privacy. Whoever, intentionally or knowingly

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … not being more than seven years, as the court thinks fit: xxx 72. xxx xxx‖ Having regard to the submissions which have been made, Section … and 5 of the Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 2 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (hereafter referred to as the 'IT Act of 1956').3. As per the complaint, it appears that A & B, hailing from extremely poor families of

Uma Polymers (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)284ITR1(Jodh.)

Confirmed copy of account 64 to 64 showing transaction mostly5. Jitendra Raj Confirmed copy of account 71 to 72 Lodha showing transaction mostly6. Virendra Raj Confirmed copy of account 76 Lodha showing transaction7. Smt. Urmila Confirmed copy … it was invalid being beyond limitation available to the assessee for filing the return under Section 139(5) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The learned AO processed the original return filed by the assessee

Sri Sunil Bharti Mittal Vs. Sri N Naresh Kumar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 504, 506(B) IPC and Sections 72-A and 66-A of Information Technology Act, 2000.2. A private compliant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. was lodged by the Respondent No.1 stating that the Complainant is