Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the it act 2000 section 70 · Page 1 of about 757 results (0.065 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 04 2014

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-04-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

altering the charges and as the act constituting the offences punishable under Sections 66, 70 and 72 of IT Act 2000 are arising out of the single incident of publication of transcript of audio conversation in electronic media, the … exclusive use of S.K.Upadhyay, IPC, Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption dishonestly from the computer have committed an offence under Section 70 of the Information Technology act. (iii)the petitioner/accused by being instrumental for the publication of the conversation between Tr.S.K.Upadhyay

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2006

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2006

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant/petitioner approached this Court for declaring that Section 70 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is unconstitutional and unenforceable and also for issuance of a writ of … on which Government is confirmed copyright under Section 17 (d). The learned single Judge held as follows:.Therefore while the IT Act deals with all matters pertaining to information technology, copyright in respect of information technology has to be considered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2003

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-10-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

in a particular year was Rs. 100 and the company was having a carry forward loss of Rs. 70 After adjusting the above Rs. 70, the company shall be liable to pay tax on the balance of … only one ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

measures. CIDR being a computer resource is notified to be a “Protected System” under Section 70 of the IT Act, 2000 by the Central Government on 11.12.2015. Anyone trying to unlawfully gain access into this system is liable to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2016

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-03-2016

Subject : Right to Information

the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … in the case diary. No notice has been sent to the old woman Smt. Gulshan Johar (aged about 70 years), nor has she played any role in committing any offence. Only the draft of Rs.2.50 lakh had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2004

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Fertilizer Traders [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(All.)473

CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding the validity of the order dt. 4th Oct., 2000 that had been passed earlier by the Dy. CIT, Central Circle, Gorakhpur under Section 154 r/w Section 158BC, … are directed against different orders of the CIT(A)-I, Kanpur dt. 14th Aug., 2002 passed under Section 158BC/154 of the IT Act, 1961.3. In both the cases of the assessees, undisclosed income was computed and thereafter it was bifurcated in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2005

Wipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on : Jun-21-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211

if a business is discontinued during a year, loss cannot be disallowed.There is no such prohibitive condition under Section 70 of the IT Act.Consequently, the assessee is entitled to seek set off of operating loss as business loss … filed along with the return, it is seen that the assessee-company has claimed exemption under Section 10A of the IT Act in respect of income from Software Technology Parks (STPs), Electronic Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs), etc. to the extent … 111, Mount Road, 98/2761 Guindy, Chennai-600Pune Wipro Ltd., CTS, 685/2B STP/P/VIII(A) 10-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Gurgaon Wipro Ltd., Flat No.201, PCMG/PSE/5 19-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Mysore -- -- --

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2005

Wipro Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on : Jun-21-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)5SOT805(Bang.)

a business is discontinued during a year, loss cannot be disallowed. There is no such prohibitive condition under section 70 if the IT Act. Consequently the assessee is entitled to seek set off of operating loss as business … filed along with the return, it is seen that the assessee-company has claimed exemption under section 10A of the IT Act in respect of income from Software Technology Parks (STPs), Electronic Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs), etc. to the extent … No. STP/P/VIII(A)/ 270/2000/2459, dated 19-9-2000.3. STPI, Bangalore-Letter No. STPIB/WIPRO Systems /Expan / 2000051901 / 2053 dated 20-52000.6. Letter dated 19-8-1998 of Under Secretary, Government of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2008

Picker India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Neena Syal v. Asstt. CIT (2000) 69 TTJ (Chd) 516 : (1999) 70 ITD (Chd) 62. CIT(A) should decide the matter one way or other … filed by the Revenue and both are against the order of the CIT(A)-XXIX, New Delhi dt. 14th July, 2000. There are six grounds in the appeal of the assessee. Grounds 3 to 6 of the assessee's appeal … with certain guidelines. Further, the CIT(A) is directing the AO to apply the provisions of Section 92 of the IT Act and issuing certain directions in this regard. Finally, other two grounds Nos. 1 and 2 are: 1. That

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2019

Swami Ramdev & Anr. Vs.facebook, Inc. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-23-2019

Subject : Right to Information

Rules are relevant. The same are extracted below: CS (OS) 27/2019 Page 63 of 76 The Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 2(j) ―computer network means the interconnection of one or more computers through- (i) the use of satellite, microwave, … Ramdev, ISBN No.9789386228383 in any manner,- until they delete the following : - (a) At Pages 69 to 70, Chapter 9 Mystery 1 : The Ally‘s Murder (Entire Chapter 9). "A day after the Asian tsunami swept

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial