Advanced Search Results

A.Shankar Vs. Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

altering the charges and as the act constituting the offences punishable under Sections 66, 70 and 72 of IT Act 2000 are arising out of the single incident of publication of transcript of audio conversation in electronic media, the … exclusive use of S.K.Upadhyay, IPC, Director, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption dishonestly from the computer have committed an offence under Section 70 of the Information Technology act. (iii)the petitioner/accused by being instrumental for the publication of the conversation between Tr.S.K.Upadhyay

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant/petitioner approached this Court for declaring that Section 70 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is unconstitutional and unenforceable and also for issuance of a writ of … on which Government is confirmed copyright under Section 17 (d). The learned single Judge held as follows:.Therefore while the IT Act deals with all matters pertaining to information technology, copyright in respect of information technology has to be considered

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability … refined in Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar [Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar,(1966) 1 SCR 709 : AIR 1966 SC 740 : 1966 Cri LJ 608] , where this Court held : (SCR p.

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

in a particular year was Rs. 100 and the company was having a carry forward loss of Rs. 70 After adjusting the above Rs. 70, the company shall be liable to pay tax on the balance of … only one ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89,

Sasidharan M.G. vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

the liabilities of the intermediaries and exemptions respectively 3.19 It is submitted that as per Section 69A of the IT Act 2000, MeitY is empowered to block the information for public access through any computer resource only under the following … Guidelines) Rules 2011.3.25 It is submitted that in exercise of the powers conferred by subsection (1) of section 70B of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. 2008, effective from 27 10.2009, appointed the Respondent No.5 Indian Computer Emergency

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

measures. CIDR being a computer resource is notified to be a “Protected System” under Section 70 of the IT Act, 2000 by the Central Government on 11.12.2015. Anyone trying to unlawfully gain access into this system is liable to

Phani Leyba Nangli vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

07.10.2025 OF THE RESPONDENT/HSR LAYOUT POLICE STATION, ALLEGING THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 66(C), 66(D) AND 84(b) OF IT ACT 2000 SECTIONS 318 (4), 319, 61(2) AND 111(2), 111(4) AND 4 R/W SECTION 3(5) OF BNS 2023.-3- IN CRL.P

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … in the case diary. No notice has been sent to the old woman Smt. Gulshan Johar (aged about 70 years), nor has she played any role in committing any offence. Only the draft of Rs.2.50 lakh had

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Fertilizer Traders [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(All.)473

CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding the validity of the order dt. 4th Oct., 2000 that had been passed earlier by the Dy. CIT, Central Circle, Gorakhpur under Section 154 r/w Section 158BC, … are directed against different orders of the CIT(A)-I, Kanpur dt. 14th Aug., 2002 passed under Section 158BC/154 of the IT Act, 1961.3. In both the cases of the assessees, undisclosed income was computed and thereafter it was bifurcated in

Wipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211

if a business is discontinued during a year, loss cannot be disallowed.There is no such prohibitive condition under Section 70 of the IT Act.Consequently, the assessee is entitled to seek set off of operating loss as business loss … filed along with the return, it is seen that the assessee-company has claimed exemption under Section 10A of the IT Act in respect of income from Software Technology Parks (STPs), Electronic Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs), etc. to the extent … 111, Mount Road, 98/2761 Guindy, Chennai-600Pune Wipro Ltd., CTS, 685/2B STP/P/VIII(A) 10-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Gurgaon Wipro Ltd., Flat No.201, PCMG/PSE/5 19-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Mysore -- -- --