Advanced Search Results

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dipesh Chandak, Dipesh Chandak

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)110TT(JP.)at366

through the Chief CIT, Bihar, to initiate such action as may be considered fit, necessary and expedient under the IT Act, WT Act, etc against persons whom he reasonably thinks to be involved in the 'scam' and possess unaccountable … cases to the CBI and provided documentary evidences to substantiate the same. He made a confessional statement Under Section 164 Cr.PC before the 1st Class Judicial Magistrate on 20th March, 1997 at Dhanbad in which he revealed … the statement of Sri Chandak, as is apparent from paras 471 and 722 of the impugned order, which are reproduced below: 471. On the other

M/S.Axiom Gen Nxt India Private Limited vs Commercial State Tax Office ...

Court : Chennai

same. 3.9 Mr.G.Natarajan, learned counsel has referred provisions of Sections 11, 12 & 13 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter called as “IT Act”) and has extensively argued on the aspect of receipt of the notices, orders … said common portal cannot be considered as a “designated computer resource”. Hence, in terms of Section 13(2)(a)(ii) of the IT Act, in absence of a designated computer resource, the receipt of the electronic records will occur only when the … Mandamus, to call for the records relating an impugned order under section 73 of the GST Act dated 02.08.2024 vide Reference No. ZD330824035986Z in Form

Manjeet Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376 (2) (g); 354, 363, 366, 506; The Information Technology Act 2000 - Section 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 313; The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act - Section 6

`2,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. 5. Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. - Rigorous Imprisonment for four years and fine of `10,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for … rise to the present appeal can be stated thus. In the year 2008, PW1 prosecutrix was studying in 7th standard in Government Senior Secondary School, Paonta Sahib. PW2 her friend was her School- mate. They were residing

Kalyani Sales Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(8), 13(10), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(6), 17(7), 18A, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(8), 19(25), 31, 34, 35, 37, 38(2), 40 and 40(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - 1(4), 2, 3, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 19, 19(1) and 31; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 12, 17 and 18; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2000; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2006P& H107; I(2006)BC1; (2006)142PLR1; [2006]70SCL177(Punj& Har)

than Rs.1 lac ?3. Whether ad valorem court fee prescribed under Rule 7 of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993, is payable on an … statutory provisions would be helpful. These are:The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2000.2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-(ha) 'debt' shall have the meaning assigned to it in … No. 2550 of 2005. These are as follows:On 29.09.2003, the Bank issued to the petitioners a notice Under Section 13(2) of the Act calling upon them to pay an amount of Rs. 88,61,830.68 p. The petitioners filed

Doly Prabhat Maithy vs State by

Court : Karnataka

age, are they to be dealt with under the IT Act, 1956 or in accordance with the JJ Act, 2000? In order to find answers to the questions arising in the present case, we may firstly consider the … 16 alone. Interestingly, no similar provisions have been made with regard to persons who would be covered under Section 7 of the IT Act of 1956.125. Section 17A of the IT Act was incorporated into the statute by … also noteworthy, that by a statutory amendment with effect from 26th January, 1987, the following section 17A of the IT Act of 1956 was inserted : -“17A. Conditions to be observed before placing persons rescued under section 16 to

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rabindranath Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(Raj)410

the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) under Section 89(1) over and above the exemption provided in Section 10(10C) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The Revenue took exception to the order of the AAC by filing an appeal before the Tribunal,

Ashwinbhai Somabhai Patel and anr. Vs. Nrugendraprasadji Ajendraprasad ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 3, 65, 65(1), 65(A), 65(B), 65B(1), 65(2) and 65B(2); Information Technology Act, 2000; Registration Act - Sections 17; Information Technology (Certifying Authorities) Rules, 2000; Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officer and manner on holding inquiry) Rules, 2003; Information Technology (Security Procedure) Rules, 2004; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Civil Practice Rules- Rule 60; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2352

There is no evidence to suggest that it is electronic record as per the provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000 and as per Sections 65A and B or amended Evidence Act.(iii) The documents produced vide Exh. 54/1 does … and manner on holding inquiry) Rules, 2003; the Information Technology (Security Procedure) Rules, 2004 and the provisions of Sections 3 and 65(a) of the Evidence Act, the documents produced and sought to be relied upon are not … Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple and Anr. reported in : 2003 (8) SCC 752 and the decision of this Court in the case of Kanbi Mavji

K. Ramajayam @ Appu Vs. The Inspector of Police, T-4, Maduravoyal Poli ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

3, Section 25, Section 114, Section 45, Section 45A, section 76, Section 62, Section 65B - Information Technology Act, 2000- Section 2, Section 2(t), Section 2, Section 79A - Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - burglary and murder €“ … on back of head in the occipital region." As to the cause of death, which is relevant under Section 7 of the Evidence Act, Dr.Selvakumar (PW-21) has stated that 'the deceased would appear to have died of shock

Anand Kumar Agarwal (Huf) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)92TTJAgra81

as partners of the firm, M/s New Alankar Jewellers. The firm was also regular assessee.4.1 On 19th Jan., 2000, the IT Department carried out a search action at the business premises of the partnership firm as well … (BF), ITO, Ward Dy. CIT (Inv.) ChatarpurChatarpur Chatarpur Circle 2(1), Jabalpur.2 to 7 not relevant8. Shri Vijay Kumar Agarwal S/o " "Late Shri Chhotelal, P/o … under : "In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) and Sub-section (3) of Section 127 of the IT Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and all the other powers enabling him in this behalf, the CIT, Jabalpur, hereby

Tirumala Devi Eada and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Law (La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

A.P. State Gazette is immaterial. At the outset, we may refer to Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000: “8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette:- Where any law provides that any rule, regulation, order, … declared to have been qualified by notification dated 8.8.2011 and they were required to appear for viva-voce from 7.12.2011 onwards. In the meanwhile by G.O.Ms.No.132, Law (LAandJ SC.F) Department, dated 16.11.2011, the A.P. State Judicial Service Rules,