Advanced Search Results

Ms. Sapna Ganglani and anr. Vs. R.S. Enterprises and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4, 69, 69(1) and 69(2); Contract Act - Sections 45; Information Technology Act, 2000; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 99 - Order 6, Rules 14 and 15 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 30, Rules 1, 1(1), 1(2), 2, 2(3) and 3

Reported in : AIR2008Kant178; ILR2008KAR3928; 2008(6)KarLJ136; 2008(4)KCCR2234; 2008(5)AIRKarR465; AIR2008Kar178

principal.21. Sri. Chandrashsekar, learned Counsel for the petitioner-defendants submitted that by virtue of the provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000, a contract in respect of an immovable property cannot be validly entered into through E-mail and therefore, the … the Lower Court records are perused.4. Sri. Chandrashekar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, referring to the provisions of Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 (Hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and Order XXX Rule 1 of

Sapna Ganglani D/O Shyam M. Ganglani and Smt. Tamanna Moolchandani W/O ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4, 69, 69(1) and 69(2); Contract Act - Sections 45; Information Technology Act, 2000; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 99 - Order 6, Rules 14 and 15 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 30, Rules 1, 1(1), 1(2), 2, 2(3) and 3

principal.21. Sri. Chandrashsekar, learned Counsel for the petitioner-defendants submitted that by virtue of the provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000, a contract in respect of an immovable property cannot be validly entered into through E-mail and therefore, the … the Lower Court records are perused.4. Sri. Chandrashekar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, referring to the provisions of Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 (Hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and Order XXX Rule 1 of

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sahara India Financial Corpn.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)81TTJLuck389

to 1621 of the paper book. The judgment is dt. 12th May, 2000. In the public interest litigation, the allegations of irregularities were made against … 237 ITR 570 (SC), it was observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the context of Section 69 that although discretion has been conferred on the ITO under Section 69 of the Act to treat the … the material, completed assessment at Rs. 10,45,77,81,760 vide assessment order dt. 23rd April, 1999, under Section 144 of the IT Act, 1961. (ix) The assessee challenged treatment given by the AO to the special audit report before the learned

Entee Builders Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)78TTJLuck952

have been filed by the assessee against a combined order of the learned CIT(A), Bareilly dt. 18th Aug., 2000, for the asst. yrs. 1988-89,1989-90, 1990-91 and 1991-92. Since common issues are involved in these appeals, for the … Nos. 1 to 3 taken in this appeal challenge the validity of notice issued under Section 148 of the IT Act, 1961, for reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of IT Act, 1961, and the validity of reassessment … (Cal); 29. Keshav Narayan Banerjee v. CIT and Anr. (1999) 238 ITR 694 (Cal); 32. Hotel Ashoka and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.

Biru Mal Pyare Lal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Subject : Direct Taxation

the source of investment is not explained to the satisfaction of the AO, addition must be made under Section 69 of the IT Act. For this proposition, he has relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in … assesses is directed against the order of CIT(C), Ludhiana revising order of the AO under Section 263 of the IT Act, for the asst. yr. 1987-88. 2. That the learned CIT(C) has wrongly not appreciated the facts of the

Wipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211

the assessing authority and the findings thereto are at pp. 68 and 69 of the assessment order which are reproduced below : '68. The third … filed along with the return, it is seen that the assessee-company has claimed exemption under Section 10A of the IT Act in respect of income from Software Technology Parks (STPs), Electronic Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs), etc. to the extent … Systems Division, STPK/G175/97- 18-11-1997 1999-2000 1999-2000Chennai 111, Mount Road, 98/2761 Guindy, Chennai-600Pune Wipro Ltd., CTS, 685/2B STP/P/VIII(A) 10-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Gurgaon Wipro Ltd., Flat No.201, PCMG/PSE/5 19-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Mysore -- -- -- 2000-01 2000-01__________________________________________________________________________________________ was filed by the

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Fertilizer Traders [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(All.)473

on facts in upholding the validity of the order dt. 4th Oct., 2000 that had been passed earlier by the Dy. CIT, Central Circle, Gorakhpur … printouts which has been treated as undisclosed assets of the assessee firm. Such undisclosed assets are admissible under Section 69 or Section 69A of the IT Act, 1961 under the head "income from other sources'. Such head of … are directed against different orders of the CIT(A)-I, Kanpur dt. 14th Aug., 2002 passed under Section 158BC/154 of the IT Act, 1961.3. In both the cases of the assessees, undisclosed income was computed and thereafter it was bifurcated in

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said … judgment passed by the Apex court in Entertainment Network (India) Ltd vs. Super Cassettes Industries, 2008 (9) SCALE 69 wherein the apex court has expressed its opinion about the Application of International Conventions in India in the

Cambrian Hall Educational Trust Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Delhi)838

getting the sanction from CIT, Meerut, issued notice under Section 148 of the IT Act on 24th Aug., 2000. The learned counsel for the assessee requested for inspection of the file prior to proceeding under Section 148 … officer was asked to state about Vinod Jain, Proprietor of Vinod Enterprises, 69, Old Dalanwala, and give details about work and payment made to him. … the statement of Shri Mahadeo Sahi which was recorded under Section 131 when no proceeding was pending under the IT Act in the case of the appellant. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the

Dr S M Mannan Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation (anti Corruption Bur ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Miscellaneous

copies of directions issued under section 5(2) of the Telegraph Act-1885 and section 69 of the Information Technology Act-2000 are forwarded to the Review Committee within a period of seven working days. 35 iiii. In the instant