Advanced Search Results

Tata Sky Ltd Vs. Youtube Llc and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

bound to protect. Please be advised that this is an offence under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 107 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. 9. .. Therefore, you are required to … forms relevant to each category. 20. YouTube's defence is on the following lines: (a) Being an intermediary under the IT Act, is statutorily exempt under Section 79 from liability in respect of any third party video uploaded on the

Sundar Iyer Vs. The State represented by the Inspector of Police, Vepe ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

is closed. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 420, Section 120-B Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66 D Quashing of FIR Petition sought to quash First Information Report pending investigation against Petitioner/Accused for offences under

Veena Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Education

under Sections 341 and 384 etc., of the IPC, as well as Section 66(1) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 3. Further, it was the allegation of the respondents that a rowdy sheet was opened against the detenue

Ashwath and Others Vs. The State Through Aland Police Station, Represe ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

for the offences punishable under Sections 295-A r/w Sec. 149 of IPC and Sec.66 of Information and Technology Act, 2000. 2. The facts leading to the case are that; the respondents police have filed a complaint alleging that … dated 20.1.2017 for taking cognizance for the offences punishable under Sec. 295-A R/w 149 of IPC and under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act and quash FIR, complaint and entire charge sheet pending against the petitioners on

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … of the complaint made, FIR No.24/2012 under Section 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) was registered against the petitioners by Cyber Police

Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 65, 66, 66(1), 66(2) and 77B; ;Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83 and 438; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 419 and 420

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945

by Annexure A First Information Report, are under Sections 65 and 66(1) and (2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. After hearing all the counsel and the learned Additional Advocate General of the State of Punjab, it is … de facto complainant Company, it is seen that one of the offences alleged against the accused is under Section 66(1) and (2) of the Information Technology Act. Section 66 of the Information Technology Act was substituted by Act

J.N. Marshall and Co. Vs. Income Tax Officer and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254(2) and 260A

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Bom)603; [2003]264ITR690(Bom)

2000, in Misc. Appln. No. 219/Bom/1999, the assessee has come by way of appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, In this appeal, we are concerned with the financial year ending 31st Dec., 1985, relevant to the asst.

Nayaz Phasha vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

SHEET AND PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.28443/2024 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 384, 195(A), 511 R/W 34 OF IPC, SEC.66(E) OF IT ACT, 2000, REGISTERED BY THE 1st RESPONDENT POLICE ON THE COMPLAINT OF RESPONDENT NO.2 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE … ENTIRE CHARGE SHEET AND PROCEEDINGS IN CC.28443/2024 (ARISING OUT OF THE CRIME NO.37/2023) FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 384, 195A, 511 R/W 34 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE AND 66E OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 REGISTERED BY

Syed AsifuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1) and 65; Income Tax Act - Sections 65 and 66; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 405, 409, 415 and 420

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)96; 2005CriLJ4314

a charge specifically with regard to hacking with computer system, which is an offence under Section 66 of the IT Act. At this stage, we may read Sections 65 and 66 of the IT Act.65. Tampering with computer source … 409, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC), Section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, IT Act) and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short, Copyright Act).2. The crime

Abhishek Mishra vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

504, 506, 509 OF IPC AND SEC.3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT 1989 AND SEC.66-E OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (ANNEXURE-D) AND ETC.,THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 25.06.2025, COMING ON FOR … SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPP FOR R-1; SRI M.B.RAVI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 ) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OFCR.P.C., PRAYING TO 1. QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL.C.NO.1029/2024 PENDING ON THE FILES OF THE COURT