Advanced Search Results

Koshy Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 65, 66, 66(1), 66(2) and 77B; ;Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83 and 438; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 419 and 420

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT945

by Annexure A First Information Report, are under Sections 65 and 66(1) and (2) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. After hearing all the counsel and the learned Additional Advocate General of the State of Punjab, it is … ORDERK.T. Sankaran, J.1. This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, filed by Dr. K.A. Koshy and Dr. Serena, who are two

Syed AsifuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1) and 65; Income Tax Act - Sections 65 and 66; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 405, 409, 415 and 420

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)96; 2005CriLJ4314

409, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC), Section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, IT Act) and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short, Copyright Act).2. The crime … a charge specifically with regard to hacking with computer system, which is an offence under Section 66 of the IT Act. At this stage, we may read Sections 65 and 66 of the IT Act.65. Tampering with computer source

Bhim Sen Garg Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 5, 6 and 65; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 182, 211, 366, 376, 417, 465, 467, 468, 469 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 155, 155(2), 156, 156(1), 156(2), 157, 162, 164, 169, 170, 173, 319 and 482; Evidence Act; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3643; RLW2006(3)Raj2411; 2006(4)WLC579

Jaipur for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 469, 471, 120B, IPC, and Section 65 of Information Technology Act 2000.2. During, the course of investigation, the Investigating Officer has deleted the offence under Section 65 of the J.T.

Tata Sky Ltd Vs. Youtube Llc and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

bound to protect. Please be advised that this is an offence under Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 107 and 109 of the Indian Penal Code. 9. .. Therefore, you are required to … determining it to be a complaint regarding 'circumvention of technological measures' which is defined as an offence under Section 65 A of the Copyright Act, YouTube's review team appears to have got into a bind about correctly 'categorising' … forms relevant to each category. 20. YouTube's defence is on the following lines: (a) Being an intermediary under the IT Act, is statutorily exempt under Section 79 from liability in respect of any third party video uploaded on the

income Tax Officer Vs. Shahid Atiq L/H of Late Atiquer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)89ITD489(Delhi)

These are two appeals filed by the Revenue against the order of the learned CIT(A) dt. 23rd March, 2000, for the asst. yrs. 1992-93 and 1993-94.2. Since identical grounds have been raised in both the appeals by … was not legally permissible therefore filed a letter as referred to above. Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 have also been initiated separately for not furnishing full and correct particulars of his income under the … on 21st Dec., 1992 by the assessee and the income of Rs. 65,000 was declared. The return was processed under Section 143(1)(a) of IT Act.

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

It is now necessary to set out the relevant provisions of the Evidence Act and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 3 of the Evidence Act defines “document” as follows: “Document.-- "Document" means any matter expressed or described upon … No.6/2014 to get the copies of electronic record in respect of aforesaid incidents with certificate as provided in section 65-B of the Evidence Act. The correspondence made with them show that even after leaving of the office by

Ashwinbhai Somabhai Patel and anr. Vs. Nrugendraprasadji Ajendraprasad ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 3, 65, 65(1), 65(A), 65(B), 65B(1), 65(2) and 65B(2); Information Technology Act, 2000; Registration Act - Sections 17; Information Technology (Certifying Authorities) Rules, 2000; Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officer and manner on holding inquiry) Rules, 2003; Information Technology (Security Procedure) Rules, 2004; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Civil Practice Rules- Rule 60; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2352

There is no evidence to suggest that it is electronic record as per the provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000 and as per Sections 65A and B or amended Evidence Act.(iii) The documents produced vide Exh. 54/1 does … which is otherwise inadmissible in evidence.(vii) It is further submitted that the condition contemplated by Sub-section (2) of Section 65 of the Evidence Act are not satisfied, and therefore, Video CD. itself is inadmissible in the evidence.(viii) It

Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)102TTJ(Mum.)53

Thalanga Copper Mines (P) Ltd. Monte Cello Corporation NV subsequently sold Monte Cello BV to Sterlite. In July, 2000, Sterlite's telecommunications cables and optical fibre business was demerged into a new company, Sterlite Optical Technologies Ltd. ("SOTL").66. … of the Court. The expression "sufficient cause or reason" as provided in Sub-section (5) of Section 253 of the IT Act is used in identical position in the Limitation Act and the CPC. Such expression has also been used … to asst. yr. 1995-96, relates to grant of capital loss of Rs. 65,900 on sale of the land. The assessee had sold the land to

The Jt. Commissioner of Income Vs. India Equipment Leasing Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)111ITD37(Chennai)

income on non-performing assets (NPAs), while computing the returned income. The assessee vide his letter dated 26 February 2000 stated that it was following prudential norms prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India and based on the … the case of Bank of Rajasthan v. IAC 68 ITD 69 wherein ITAT, Bench Jaipur observed as under: The IT Act, 1961, is an independent code in itself. Total income or loss to be computed has to be in … not contrary to accounting standard notified by Central Government in pursuance to Section 145(2) of the Act. The assessee is following the system of accounting … have been written off in view of decision reported in 161 ITR 65.7. On the other hand Shri Shaji P. Jacob, Sr. Departmental Representative submitted

Smt. Mina Deogun Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)117TTJ(Kol.)121

under the head 'House property' and be further directed to allow statutory deductions permissible under Section 24 of the IT Act.3. Both the parties were heard regarding the issues raised by the assessee and its legal implications.4. During the