Advanced Search Results
Arun T a vs the State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Apr-10-2026
and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, “BNS”) and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short "IT Act") against the petitioner (Accused No.1) and others.3. It is alleged that the complainant becameacquainted … the complaint on 29.05.2025.4. Upon completion of investigation, the policehave filed a charge sheet. Notably, the offence under Section 64 of BNS initially invoked has been dropped against the petitioner. However, offences under Sections 75 and 78 of … been dropped against the petitioner. However, offences under Sections 75 and 78 of BNS and Section 66E of the IT Act have been retained.5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that The allegations are inherently improbable and suffer
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Jun-21-2005
Direct Taxation
(2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211
by the assessing authority in the course of assessment order at paras 64 and 65. The first component of a sum of Rs. 49,32,097 was … filed along with the return, it is seen that the assessee-company has claimed exemption under Section 10A of the IT Act in respect of income from Software Technology Parks (STPs), Electronic Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs), etc. to the extent … Systems Division, STPK/G175/97- 18-11-1997 1999-2000 1999-2000Chennai 111, Mount Road, 98/2761 Guindy, Chennai-600Pune Wipro Ltd., CTS, 685/2B STP/P/VIII(A) 10-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Gurgaon Wipro Ltd., Flat No.201, PCMG/PSE/5 19-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Mysore -- -- -- 2000-01 2000-01__________________________________________________________________________________________ was filed by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadanapalli Institute of Technology and Science and Others Vs. State o ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-01-2000
Constitution
All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10, 11 and 23; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation fee) Act, 1983 - Sections 3(1) and 12; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 246(1 and 3), 248, 252, 254 and 371-D; Andhra Pradesh Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission into under-graduate professional courses through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 1993 - Rules 4, 5, 6 and 7; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission) Order, 1974; Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1976; Andhra Pradesh Commissionerate of Higher Education Act, 1986; University Grants Commission Act, 1956; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 10(A and B(3)); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 -
2000(2)ALD179; 2000(1)ALT666
Matched in: Citation 2000(2)ALD179; 2000(1)ALT666
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Zauri Leasing and Finance Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Apr-08-2008
Direct Taxation
(2008)115TTJ(Delhi)721
by the assessee comprised of principal and the interest thereon; (b) As per provisions of Section 36(1)(vii) of the IT Act, deduction was to be allowed in respect of the bad debt written off as irrecoverable in the account … lakhs in asst. yr. 1997-98; (ii) Rapid Construction, New Delhi for lease charges for asst. yrs. 1999-2000 and 2000-01 of becon batching plant and DG set amounting to Rs. 26,89,910 stated to be given on lease in … The total income declared was a negative figure of loss of Rs. 64,17,960. The AO took up the assessment and issued notice Under Section 143(2)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParshuram D. Patil Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jan-25-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)103TTJ(Mum.)765
profit shown by the assessee was 2.43 per cent. The learned Counsel by referring to pp. 63 and 64 of the paper book, contended that in identical case of M/s Bhoir Sand Agency the net profit was … dt. 28th March, 2002 passed by Asstt. GIT, Central Circle-2, Thane, under Section 158BC(c) r/w Section 254 of the IT Act.2. IT(SS)A Nos. 222 and 223/Mum/2004-The following grounds of appeal (as concised) have been raised in these appeals- 1.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Ganapathy Manickam vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Mar-05-2026
THE XLV ADDL. CJM, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 43, 65 AND 66 OF THE I.T. ACT, 2000 AND SECTION 447 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND SECTIONS 34, 120B, 379, 408, 420, 409, 403, 381, … the said properties and thus made themselves liable under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957.25. That under Section 64 of the Copyright Act 1957 the localpolice having the jurisdiction to investigate can seize all the copies of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamiah Sambandam vs the State of Karnataka by Cyber Crime Ps
Karnataka
Apr-29-2025
punishable under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 1956; Sections 43, 65 & 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Sections 120B, 379, 381, 403, 405, 408, 409, 418, 415, 420 and 34 of the IPC. The learned … the said properties and thus made themselves liable under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957.25. That under Section 64 of the Copyright Act 1957 the localpolice having the jurisdiction to investigate can seize all the copies of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.K. Agrawal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
May-31-2001
Direct Taxation
by the Pune Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Prakash Foods Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (1998) 64 ITD 396 (Pune). This view was also supported by the decision of Delhi High Court reported in (1992) … of income for the asst. yr. 1991-92 and the assessment order of the AO under Section 143 of the IT Act and also the order of the CIT under Section 263 of the IT Act. In view of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Mrudulaben B. Patel Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Jan-22-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)80TTJ(Ahd.)390
The only dispute involved in this appeal is relating to penalty of Rs. 59,302 under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The rival contentions have been heard and record perused.2. The relevant facts in this case are that the … decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Taiyabji Lukmanji v. CIT (1981) 131 ITR 643 (Guj) on the ground that the Hon'ble High Court has taken cognizance of the circular issued by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.N. Marshall and Co. Vs. Income Tax Officer and anr.
Mumbai
Apr-24-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254(2) and 260A
(2003)183CTR(Bom)603; [2003]264ITR690(Bom)
2000, in Misc. Appln. No. 219/Bom/1999, the assessee has come by way of appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, In this appeal, we are concerned with the financial year ending 31st Dec., 1985, relevant to the asst.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »