Advanced Search Results

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Amritsar Beverages Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 14 and 14(3); Information Technology Act, 2000; Evidence Act - Sections 45, 63, 73A, 85A and 85B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 29, 167, 172, 192, 463 and 464; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 273; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2820; 2006(7)SCALE587; (2006)607SCC7; [2006]147STC657(SC); 2006(2)LC1111(SC); 2006(7)SCC607

developments leading to various different kinds of crimes unforeseen by our legislature come to immediate focus. Information Technology Act, 2000 although was amended to include various kinds of cyber crimes and the punishments therefore, does not deal with … 463 of the Indian Penal Code have been amended to include electronics documents within the definition of 'documents'. Section 63 of the Evidence Act has been amended to include admissibility of computer outputs in the media, paper, optical

Syed AsifuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1) and 65; Income Tax Act - Sections 65 and 66; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 405, 409, 415 and 420

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)96; 2005CriLJ4314

409, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC), Section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, IT Act) and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short, Copyright Act).2. The crime … a charge specifically with regard to hacking with computer system, which is an offence under Section 66 of the IT Act. At this stage, we may read Sections 65 and 66 of the IT Act.65. Tampering with computer source

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

It is now necessary to set out the relevant provisions of the Evidence Act and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 3 of the Evidence Act defines “document” as follows: “Document.-- "Document" means any matter expressed or described upon … the Evidence Act defines primary evidence as meaning the document itself produced for the inspection of the court. Section 63 of the Evidence Act speaks of the kind or types of secondary evidence by which documents may be

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT49

VIII and XII of the said Schedule shall not be deemed to be incorporated within the supply license.42. Section 63 of the Delhi Electricity Reform Act, 2000 reads as under:-63. Effect of the Act on the Indian Electricity … mess. Various State Governments enacted Electricity Reforms Acts. In the Union Territory of Delhi, the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 was promulgated on 23.11.2000.37. Vide Section 3 of the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 the Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Babros Machinery Mfrs. (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)84ITD91(Ahd.)

Amar Nath Aggarwal v. Dy. CIT (2000) 67 TTJ (Del) 551 and Sitadevi Daga v. Asstt. CIT (1999) 63 TTJ (Ind) 72 : (1998) 67 ITD 151 (Ind). (ii) It was an undisputed fact that the item … passed by the AO who is Dy. CIT(A) Special Range-2, Ahmedabad, under Section 158BD r/w Section 158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961 for the Block Period asst. yrs. 1986-87 to 1995-96 and 1st April, 1995 to 8th Sept., 1995.2.

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said … the rights of the copyright owner cannot be curtailed by applying any other provision of the IT Act. 63. I find that the provisions of Section 79 of the IT Act will have no bearing on the

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … of this family environment temporarily or permanently. Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 52 63. Rule 25 of the JJ (Care & Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 … and 5 of the Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 2 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (hereafter referred to as the 'IT Act of 1956').3. As per the complaint, it appears that A & B, hailing from extremely poor families of

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Enron Oil and Gas India Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(Uttranchal)411

facts and circumstances of the case, in allowing foreign exchange loss of Rs. 11,58,44,887 under Section 42 of the IT Act, 1961, without appreciating the fact that the loss is only a book entry and no loss was incurred … New Delhi, in ITA No. 1821/2005; ITA No. 1823/2005 and ITA No. 1824/2005, relating to asst. yrs. 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 1998-99, respectively, whereby the depreciation on account of foreign exchange loss allowed to the assessee by the

B.K. Agrawal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Subject : Direct Taxation

Bench decision in the case of Sunder Agencies v. Dy. CIT (1997) 59 TTJ (Mumbai) 610 : (1997) 63 ITD 245 (Mumbai). The view of the Pune Bench regarding the disclosure that even disclosure by the employer … of income for the asst. yr. 1991-92 and the assessment order of the AO under Section 143 of the IT Act and also the order of the CIT under Section 263 of the IT Act. In view of the

Present Mr. Munish Mittal Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Mujessar, District Faridabad for an offence punishable under sections 429 IPC and section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and sections 63 and 64 of the Copyright Act, 1957 alongwith all the subsequent proceedings arising out of