Advanced Search Results

Christian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

(COMM) 344/2018 Page 6 of 59 2009 (hereinafter, ‘IT Act’). The issue of liability under Section 79 of the IT Act is to be decided on the basis of pleadings and documents on record, none of which are disputed … Defendants’ use of the Plaintiff’s mark, logos and the Information image is protected under Section 79 of Technology Act, 2000?. b) Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to relief, and if so, in what terms?. E-commerce platforms and their

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

AMENDMENTS UNDER THE IT ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED ON 2009) ON THE REMEDIES PRESCRIBED UNDER COPYRIGHT ACT 1957. 59. Now I shall discuss another aspect of impact of the amended provisions of Information Technology Act 2000 on … Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dipesh Chandak, Dipesh Chandak

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)110TT(JP.)at366

(v) any sum chargeable to income-tax under Clauses (ii) and (iii) of Section 28 or Section 41 or Section 59; (va) any sum chargeable to income-tax under Clause (iiia) of Section 28; (vb) any sum chargeable to income-tax … through the Chief CIT, Bihar, to initiate such action as may be considered fit, necessary and expedient under the IT Act, WT Act, etc against persons whom he reasonably thinks to be involved in the 'scam' and possess unaccountable

L’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

primarily on the ground that intermediaries are exempt from liabilities under Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. However, this Court finds that in the present plaint there is an allegation that the applicant- defendant who … case. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that 8. protection of Section 79(1) of the IT Act cannot be granted to Defendant No.2. In fact Section 79(1) is subject to Section 79(2) and 79(3) of

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

measures. CIDR being a computer resource is notified to be a “Protected System” under Section 70 of the IT Act, 2000 by the Central Government on 11.12.2015. Anyone trying to unlawfully gain access into this system is liable to

Amit Estate Organizer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)113TTJ(Ahd.)1018

were processed under Section 143(l)(a) of the Act.4.3 Later on, the AO issued notices under Section 148 of the IT Act, 1961 on 28th Jan., 2000 for asst. yr. 1997-98 and proceeded to frame the assessment. During the course … accounts cannot be rejected, reliance was placed on the following: (i) Uttam Chuna Pathar Udyog v. ITO (1997) 59 TTJ (Raj) 763 : (1998) 65 ITD 466 (Raj) Accounts-Rejection-Minor defects in accounts-Assessee wrongly showing the attendance of

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … relation to the local authority only), as well as those of Section 59(2) of the JJ Act, 2000 on the ground of their being unconstitutional … and 5 of the Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 2 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (hereafter referred to as the 'IT Act of 1956').3. As per the complaint, it appears that A & B, hailing from extremely poor families of

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Vindhya Telelinks Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)107TTJJab149

IT Appeal No. 112 which is stated to be pending.5. The notice under Section 148 dt. 23rd Oct., 2000 was issued for the reasons that: (1) Original assessment was completed under Section 143(3) on 23rd Nov., 1994 … CIT(A), Jabalpur which was disposed of by him on 7th Feb., 1995. Subsequently order under Section 263 of the IT Act was passed on 25th March, 1998 by the CIT, Jabalpur. Against this order, the Tribunal accepted the appeal

K.R.Ravi Rathinam Vs. 1. the Director General of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

offences under Sections 66 B, 66 E, 72, 72 A r/w. 76 and 77 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 109, 379, 403, 420, 468, 470, 471 along with 120 (b) of IPC. The intellectual property … the Respondents 7, 8, 10 and 11.9. The Respondents 7, 8, 10 and 11 have committed offences under Sections 66 B, 66 E, 72, 72 A r/w. 76 and 77 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and

Bharatiya Janata Party Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)80ITD89(Delhi)

(1975) 101 ITR 796 (SC). The learned standing counsel also relied on a Departmental Circular dt. 19th Oct., 2000, according to which provisions of Section 44AB r/w Section 271B were held not to be applicable.16. It was … is registered as a National Party with the Election Commission of India. A notice under Section 142(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the "Act") and a letter bearing No. 363 dt. 30th Nov., 1995 were issued on … Dec., 1995. In the said return assessee reflected a loss of Rs. 59,55,660, as under: 3. Return was processed under Section 143(1)(a). Capital gain was