Advanced Search Results

Act1: the it act 2000 section 54 · Page 1 of about 712 results (0.092 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Sep 08 2000

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. U.P. Forest Corporation

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Decided on : Sep-08-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

and 1229/All/1989 for the asst. yrs. 1985-86 and 1986-87 respectively, the Tribunal issued notice under Section 254(2) of the IT Act dt. 30th Aug., 2000 requiring the assessee, M/s. U.P. Forest Corporation, Lucknow and the Revenue to state their … got power to rectify its mistakes by making necessary amendments. In that case, the assesses claimed exemption under Section 54 of the Act on the sale of a house at 'Bombay. The Tribunal, vide its order dt. 8th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2001

Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-20-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD111(Kol.)

the learned authorised representative of the assessee referred to pp. 52 to 54 of the paper book. It was emphasised by the learned authorised representative … order of the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997 … directed against the order of the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2003

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-10-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

only one ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89, … to an income of Rs. 39,39,228, after allowing deduction for the brought forward unabsorbed investment allowance of Rs. 54,76,236. It was subsequently found that the income assessable under Section 115J was Rs. 47,56,772 The assessment was therefore,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Oct 07 2002

Entee Builders Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Decided on : Oct-07-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)78TTJLuck952

have been filed by the assessee against a combined order of the learned CIT(A), Bareilly dt. 18th Aug., 2000, for the asst. yrs. 1988-89,1989-90, 1990-91 and 1991-92. Since common issues are involved in these appeals, for the … financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed." 54. The issue relating to period of limitation for reopening the assessment order … Nos. 1 to 3 taken in this appeal challenge the validity of notice issued under Section 148 of the IT Act, 1961, for reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of IT Act, 1961, and the validity of reassessment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Utv Software Communications Ltd. & Ors vs.thepiratebay.org and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

on a per domain basis) 456 sites blocked 13 Ireland 14 Israel 15 Italy Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000 Sections 40 (5A), 205 (9A)(a) Section 75 of the Courts Act Copyright Act, Article 156, 163(1); AGCOM Regulation, … Rights and Cultural Matters, Article 64A Copyright Act No.73/1972, Article 59 a Copyright Law No.28 of 2014, Articles 54- 56; Regs. Nos. 14 and 26 (2015) 2 sites blocked 2 sites blocked 444 sites blocked 14 sites

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019