Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the it act 2000 section 41 · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.103 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 15 2002

Dr. L. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-15-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum grabbers Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4, 6 and 41; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Income Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Tamil Nadu prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-grabbers (Conditions of Detention) Order, 1986

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2596

disputed that the petitioner is an accused under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Section 41 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 read with Section 27 of … Inspector of Police, R8 Vadapalani Police Station, Chennai for various offences, particularly Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and Section 120-B of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2016

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-03-2016

Subject : Right to Information

the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … General of Police, CID to enquire into the allegations as regards the violation of the provisions enshrined under Section 41-A to 41-C of CrPC. It needs to be stated here that in pursuance of the order passed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2016

K. Ramajayam @ Appu Vs. The Inspector of Police, T-4, Maduravoyal Poli ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-27-2016

Subject : Criminal

3, Section 25, Section 114, Section 45, Section 45A, section 76, Section 62, Section 65B - Information Technology Act, 2000- Section 2, Section 2(t), Section 2, Section 79A - Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - burglary and murder €“ … work in ideal situations. In K.Ramaraj v. State by Inspector of Police, CBCID, Chennai ((2014) 2 MLJ (Crl) 41), a Division Bench of this Court to which one of us (PNPJ) was a party, deprecated the practice

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 23 2024

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2024

Subject : Right to Information

2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2004

Vijay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-17-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Raj)90; [2004]270ITR175(Raj)

only relating to Section 80HH in asst. yrs. 1979-80 and 1980-81.2. On an application under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, the Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this Court:For asst. yr. 1979-80 :'Whether, on … arising as a result of sale of the old machinery and buildings and worked in accordance with Section 41(2), irrespective of its real character, has to be taken into account and included as income of the business.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2005

P.R. Transport Agency Through Its Partner Sri Prabhakar Singh Vs. Unio ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-24-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 16(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 13(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 41 Rule 27(1) - Order 47 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : AIR2006All23; 2006(1)AWC504

point either of transmission or of receipt.8. Anticipating the difficulties likely to arise from this, the Information Technology Act, 2000 in Section 13(3) provides as follows :-'(3) Save as otherwise agreed to between the originator and the addressee, … of review under Order 47 Rule 1 (a) or in cases of additional evidence in appeal under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the Code of Civil Procedure or in suits for specific performance of contracts where the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2001

Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-20-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD111(Kol.)

order of the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997 … directed against the order of the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the … of Paiag Nivesh (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT and Ors.(1999) 240 ITR 419 (Cal), held that Section 158BA provides for assessment of "undisclosed income" as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2007

Chandraprabha Charitable Trust Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-11-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1991 - Sections 35, 35(1), 35(2), 37(5), 39, 39(1), 39(6), 41 and 41(2); Finance Act, 2000; Income Tax Act, 1961

Reported in : (2007)209CTR(Ker)432; [2007]292ITR122(Ker)

a return filed under Section 35(1) of the Act. This position is made very clear by the Finance Act, 2000 by adding Explanation to Section 39(6). Explanation was made effective from 11th April, 1991. Explanation and the time-limit … return.Provided that in the case of assessment of agricultural income derived from manufactured tea, if the assessment under the IT Act, 1961 (Central Act 43 of 1961), is not completed when the Agrl. ITO proceeds to complete the assessment, … years from the date of filing of return ?(2) In the absence of a notice for reassessment under Section 41(2) calling for a second return and in the wake of prospective nature of the amendment brought in by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2002

All India Children Care and Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-26-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

to as "the AO") on 7th July, 1999.3. The AO issued notices under Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the IT Act dt. 18th Jan., 2000, along with a detailed enquiry letter for each year separately. In response to these … notice under Section 148 of the IT Act is issued for the asst. yrs. 1993-94, 1994-95 & 1995-96." 41. It is clear from the reasons mentioned above that no facts and figures have been mentioned by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2007

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. B.S.E.S. Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-31-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)113TTJ(Mum.)227

as the amount had not been debited to the P&L a/c under the provisions of Section 145 of the IT Act, 1961, the income which is arrived at as per the books of account had to be adopted unless … no interference. The same is upheld.11. As a result, the appeal of the Revenue for the asst. yr. 2000-01 is also dismissed. 1. (a) The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 31,23,355 being the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial