Advanced Search Results
All India Children Care and Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Jun-26-2002
Direct Taxation
to as "the AO") on 7th July, 1999.3. The AO issued notices under Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the IT Act dt. 18th Jan., 2000, along with a detailed enquiry letter for each year separately. In response to these … the Orissa High Court in the case of Secondary Board of Education Orissa v. ITO (1972) 86 ITR 408 (Ori).15. The learned standing counsel on behalf of the Department referred to the provisions of Section 147 as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatellite Television Asian Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jan-18-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)99ITD91(Mum.)
This is the position with Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 1976 (FCRA), also. Another example is the Information Technology Act, 2000, and yet another is the Indian Official Secret Act, 1923, as also the Indian Passport Act.5. In all … Mumbai passed on 30th March, 2004, and arises out of the regular assessment completed under Section 143(3) of the IT Act, 1961. The assessment has been completed by the Dy. Director of IT (International Taxation)-II(1) at Mumbai.2. The assessee-company, … has failed to do so, the AO invoked the provisions of Section 40(a)(i) of the Act and disallowed the said payment in computing the taxable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJust Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish
Supreme Court of India
Sep-23-2024
Right to Information
2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability … Appeal Nos. 2161-2162 of 2024 Page 78 of 199 were being circulated and sold for anywhere between Rs. 40 to Rs. 5,000. The news report indicates, how social media platforms are rife with child sexual abuse, and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Mina Deogun Vs. Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Aug-03-2007
Land Acquisition
(2008)117TTJ(Kol.)121
under the head 'House property' and be further directed to allow statutory deductions permissible under Section 24 of the IT Act.3. Both the parties were heard regarding the issues raised by the assessee and its legal implications.4. During the … property the DVO estimated value of land at the rate of Rs. 3,910 per sq. mtr. at Rs. 40,94,780. He however, accepted the Registered Valuer's estimate of building at Rs. 5,67,500. Accordingly, assessee's 1/4th share in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShaw Wallace Distilleries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jul-29-2004
Land Acquisition
(2004)85TTJ(Delhi)236
query to justify deduction of the royalty, the assessee explained its case as per letters dt. 24th Jan., 2000 and 10th March, 2000.7. The assessee relied upon the agreement with SWC dt. 6th July, 1996, for manufacture … bad in law and void ab initio. 1.1 That the impugned assessment order passed under Section 143(3)/-148 of the IT Act (the Act) and the notice of demand issued in the name of a non-existent entity is illegal, bad … has erred in deleting the disallowance of royalty under Section 35A or 40A(2) amounting to Rs. 5,27,35,429. 2. The learned CIT(A) in the facts and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEllenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Nov-20-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)83ITD111(Kol.)
highlighted by the AO in the assessment order (seized documents of p. 40 EGL 34).6. From the letter quoted on p. 8 of the assessment … order of the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997 … directed against the order of the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarendra Kumar JaIn Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
Jul-31-2001
Direct Taxation
certain facts relating to the proceedings in this appeal, which are as follows.5. Vide order dt. 17th April, 2000, the Bench was of the opinion that a remand report may be called from the AO and for … an imperative requirement of law. Since in the present case, no notice was issued under Section 143(2) of the. IT Act, the assessment order does not have the legal legs to stand. The same, therefore, deserves to be quashed … in law and on facts in treating the following : (a) Rs. 40,000 alleged unexplained investment in U.T.I. C.G.G.F.. Units Scheme, 1986, purchased in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rabindranath Lal
Rajasthan
Nov-21-2008
Direct Taxation
(2009)223CTR(Raj)410
the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) under Section 89(1) over and above the exemption provided in Section 10(10C) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The Revenue took exception to the order of the AAC by filing an appeal before the Tribunal,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinsilco Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jun-22-2004
Direct Taxation
(2004)85TTJ(Delhi)538
to Rs. 48,14,502 to the profit as per P&L a/c for computing book profit under Section 115JA of the IT Act. Further, he failed to appreciate that provisions of Section 115JA of the Act are deeming provisions and therefore, … be added back. He stated that a large number of judgments are available in the context of Section 40(a)(ii) which is similar to the provision of Expln. (a) to Section 115JA. The jurisdictional High Court of Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. D.L. Choudhry
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Jun-30-2004
Land Acquisition
(2004)85TTJ(Ahd.)481
assessee) and 4324/Ahd/1995 (by the Revenue) for asst. yr. 1988-89. The AO issued notice under Section 148 of the IT Act as the assessee has not filed the return of income.The assessee derives income from jeep hiring to ONGG. … made the addition of Rs. 1,20,000 on account of margin money as unexplained at the rate of Rs. 40,000 for each jeep. The CIT(A) has deleted this addition of Rs. 1,20,000.10. In respect of purchase of land
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »