Advanced Search Results

Dr. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; ;Tamil Nadu Preventive Detention of Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, (Forest-Offenders), Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-Grabbers for Preventing their Dangerous Activities Prejudicial to the Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1982 - Sections 3(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; ;Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4 and 6; ;Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2002SC3533; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)275; 2002CriLJ4721; (2002)7SCC759; 2002(2)LC1501(SC)

The main ground of detentionare that the petitioner was indulging in offences under Section67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Sections 4 and 6of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act,1986 and under Section 27 of the Arms

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 179, 181, 181(3) and 182; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23, 23(2) and 23(5); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1), 4 and 8; Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Tariff for Retail Sale of Electricity) Regulations, 2004 - Regulation 2

Reported in : AIR2005Ori11

have been satisfied if such notification is published in the Official Gazette or Electronic Gazette. He pointed that Section 4 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 further provides that where any law provides that an information or any … on 10-6-2004 they came into force. He brought to our notice that Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides inter alia that where notification is published in the Official Gazette, then such requirement shall be deemed

Smt. Mrudulaben B. Patel Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)80TTJ(Ahd.)390

any dividend distributed by a company to its shareholders is included in the income chargeable to tax under Section 4 of the IT Act, 1961. The question that requires to be considered is as to whether the dividend … The only dispute involved in this appeal is relating to penalty of Rs. 59,302 under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The rival contentions have been heard and record perused.2. The relevant facts in this case are that the

Dr. L. Prakash Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum grabbers Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 - Sections 4, 6 and 41; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Income Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Tamil Nadu prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-grabbers (Conditions of Detention) Order, 1986

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2596

Inspector of Police, R8 Vadapalani Police Station, Chennai for various offences, particularly Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 4 read with Section 6 of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and Section 120-B of the

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said … Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC). b) IA No.3085/2009 under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC. 2. The Plaintiff has filed the instant suit for restraining infringement of copyright, damages etc. The plaintiff

Birla Tyres Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)267ITR1(Kol.)

hands of AOP.3. Learned CIT, by passing an order dt. 31st March, 2000, held that according to Sections 67A and 167B(2) of the Act, the … AOP or members of the AOP individually.That option is not available under the Act of 1961 and under Section 4 of the IT Act, 1961, if it is the income of the AOP, members cannot be taxed individually … is no dispute that the shares of the members of the AOP are determinate under Section 86 of the IT Act.10. The first situation, as provided in Clause (a) of the first proviso to Section 86, is that where

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This

Arjun Malhotra Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)84TTJ(Delhi)269

of 1,00,000 NIIT shares is finally effected. The words 'sale' and 'agreement to sell have been defined in Section 4 of Sales of Goods Act, 1930 according to which where under a contract of the sale of property … gains earned on transfer of shares and eligibility of deductions in terms of provisions of Section 54F of the IT Act, 1961 against the purchase of new residential house.3. Brief facts borne out from the record in nutshell are

Essar Oil Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)102TTJ(Mum.)614

India. The assessee-company had remitted freight to the foreign oil tanker without withholding tax under Section 195 of the IT Act, 1961. The AO treated the assessee-company as an assessee-in-default and demanded a tax amount of Rs. 4,54,850 to … 1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee. The appeal relates to the asst. yr. 2000-01. The assessee had chartered a foreign oil tanker in the previous year relevant to the assessment year under

Gaya Prasad Pathak Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2007]290ITR128(MP)

Ltd. v. Union of India : 1973ECR1(SC) , Sadruddin Javeri v. Government of AP (2000) 162 CTR (AP) 496 : (1999) 104 Taxman 335, Rajesh Kumar and Ors. v. Dy. CIT and Ors. (2006) 206 CTR (SC) … ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (for brevity 'the Act') was admitted on the following substantial question of law:Whether the validity of a