Advanced Search Results
Kashmir Trading Co. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Rajasthan
Sep-11-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)206CTR(Raj)468; [2007]291ITR228(Raj)
a survey and search conducted on the assessee's business premises in July, 2000 it was not physically possible for him to have complied with the … the books of account. There is no denial of the fact that Clause (vii) of sub-Section (1) of Section 36 permits the deduction of any amount of bad debts or part thereof subject to provisions of sub-Section (2) … Rajesh Balia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant.2. This appeal is under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 by the assessee. The assessee suggested the following substantial questions stating them to be substantial questions of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouthern Technologies Ltd. Vs. Joint Commnr. of Income Tax, Coimbatore
Supreme Court of India
Jan-11-2010
BankingDirect Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 14 to 59 and 145; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 209(3), 211 and 591; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45I, 45IA, 45IC, 45IC(1), 45JA, 45JA(1), 45K(1), 45K(3) and 45Q; Hire-Purchase Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Industrial Development Bank of India Act, 1964 - Sections 2; Finance Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)
[2010]153CompCas674(SC); (2010)228CTR(SC)440; [2010]320ITR577(SC); JT2010(1)SC14; 2010(1)SCALE329; (2010)2SCC548; [2010]187TAXMAN346(SC); 2010(1)LC387(SC)
Act' for short), while computing the profits and gains of the business under Sections 28 to 43D of the IT Act? Facts2. For the sake of convenience, we may refer to the facts in the case of Southern Technologies … provision for NPA of Rs. 81,68,516/-.6. Before the AO, Assessee claimed deduction in respect of Rs. 81,68,516/- under Section 36(1)(vii) being Provision for NPA in terms of RBI Directions 1998 on the ground that Assessee had to debit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAquarius Travels (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Feb-15-2008
Direct Taxation
(2008)111ITD53(Delhi)
by the Special Bench in pursuance of the Order passed by the Hon'ble President, under Section 255(3) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The facts and circumstances leading to the constitution of the Special Bench are as under: The assessee, … the year under consideration, since the loan had been borrowed for business purposes, the conditions set out in Section 36(1)(iii) of IT Act are satisfied and therefore the interest is allowable.8.2. The AO, after considering the relevant material
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Babros Machinery Mfrs. (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Nov-14-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)84ITD91(Ahd.)
passed by the AO who is Dy. CIT(A) Special Range-2, Ahmedabad, under Section 158BD r/w Section 158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961 for the Block Period asst. yrs. 1986-87 to 1995-96 and 1st April, 1995 to 8th Sept., 1995.2.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Gupta (individual) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Jan-16-2003
Direct Taxation
(2003)78TTJ(JP.)692
at nil income. Accordingly, the AO has completed the assessment at nil income vide order dt. 15th Feb., 2000, passed under Section 143(3) and has also initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c).5. In reply to the show-cause … by the CIT(A), dt. 30th March, 2001, confirming the penalty, imposed by the AO under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act amounting to Rs. 14,45,240. "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the learned CIT(A) … along with audit report under Section 44AB declaring a loss of Rs. 36,80,600 as under : In the computation of income, the assessee has also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEce Industries Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Sep-29-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)111TTJ(Delhi)11
been brought within the purview of Section 50B which has been brought on the statute w.e.f. 1st April, 2000. Section 50B could not be made applicable to the assessee's case during the asst. yr. 1997-98. Such provision being … lamp division should not be treated as short-term capital gain as per the provisions of Section 50(2) of the IT Act, 1961. In response to the notice, it was submitted on behalf of the assessee that the Sonepat unit … a whole. The AO worked out the short-term capital gain at Rs. 36,89,23,393.3.6 Before the AO, the assessee also pleaded that although for calculation of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Oct-26-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)112TTJ(Delhi)917
corporation etc. for allowing provision for bad and doubtful debts as per Sub-clause (viia) of Sub-section (1) of Section 36. However, there is no provision made similarly for an NBFC even though both are governed by the regulatory … 1. Hon'ble President under the powers conferred on him under Section 255(3) of the IT Act, 1961 has constituted the Special Bench to dispose of this appeal as well as to decide the following
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAll India Children Care and Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Jun-26-2002
Direct Taxation
to as "the AO") on 7th July, 1999.3. The AO issued notices under Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the IT Act dt. 18th Jan., 2000, along with a detailed enquiry letter for each year separately. In response to these … the society is claimed as a trust. Subsequently on 19th April, 2002, the memorandum of appeal (Form No. 36} was revised and the appeals were signed in the capacity of the manager of the assessee-society which are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sahara India Financial Corpn.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
May-20-2003
Direct Taxation
(2003)81TTJLuck389
which is available at p. 1595 to 1621 of the paper book. The judgment is dt. 12th May, 2000. In the public interest litigation, the allegations of irregularities were made against Sahara groups of companies also. Although … the material, completed assessment at Rs. 10,45,77,81,760 vide assessment order dt. 23rd April, 1999, under Section 144 of the IT Act, 1961. (ix) The assessee challenged treatment given by the AO to the special audit report before the learned … (xi) In the case of CIT v. Rohini Builders (2002) 256 ITR 360 (Guj) it was held that unsatisfactorieness of the explanation of the assessee
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuper Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another
Delhi
Jul-29-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963
Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said … laid down in the case of Banyan Tree v. A. Murali Krishna Reddy & Anr, 2010 (42) PTC 361 (Del). The exercise of jurisdiction by this court would mean that the court is giving extraterritorial effect. b)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »