Advanced Search Results

Yogesh Agarwal Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

of Cyber Crime Police Station (CID) for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 406, 408, 426, 120B r/w. Section 34 of IPC and Sections 62 and 72 of Information Technology Act, 2000.7. It is the submission of Sri

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

Matched in: Citation AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Vs. Mc Dowell and Company Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35D, 37(1), 37(3), 43A, 154, 234(2), 254(2) and 260A; Income Tax Rules - Rule 6D

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Kar)544; [2009]310ITR215(KAR); [2009]310ITR215(Karn); [2009]177TAXMAN317(Kar); ILR2008(3)Kar3218; 2008(3)KCCRSN216; 2008(4)AIRKarR185(DB)

1. In this appeal, filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the IT Act' for short), the Revenue has challenged the correctness of the order dated 23.10.2002 passed under Section 234(2) of

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(17); Parliament Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154; Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … is quite immaterial. In Maharaj Kumar Kamal Singh v. CIT : [1959]35ITR1(SC) , the Supreme Court, while construing Section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, has held that the word 'information' appearing therein should be treated to

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; ;Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 2(17); ;Parliament Act; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 2(1); ;Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Section 26; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 154; ;Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; ;Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Gau)318,[2005]275ITR502(Gauhati)

of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … is quite immaterial. In Maharaj Kumar Kamal Singh v. CIT : [1959]35ITR1(SC) , the Supreme Court, while construing Section 34(1)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, has held that the word 'information' appearing therein should be treated to

Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya, Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharati S ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

163A and 153B 384 389, 420, 504, 506, 511 and 34 of IPC along with Section 66A on IT Act, 2000. The Police in fact have arrested the victim and her husband. In this background, in order to wreck

Christian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Defendants’ use of the Plaintiff’s mark, logos and the Information image is protected under Section 79 of Technology Act, 2000?. b) Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to relief, and if so, in what terms?. E-commerce platforms and their … (COMM) 344/2018 Page 6 of 59 2009 (hereinafter, ‘IT Act’). The issue of liability under Section 79 of the IT Act is to be decided on the basis of pleadings and documents on record, none of which are disputed … :20. h July, 2018 Date of decision :2nd November, 2018 CS (COMM) 344/2018, I.As. 19124/2014, 20912/2014, 23749/2014 & 9106/2015 CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SAS ..... Plaintiff Through:

Vijay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Raj)90; [2004]270ITR175(Raj)

used for the purpose of the business or profession, the following deductions shall, subject to the provisions of Section 34, be allowed.'It may be noted that Section 32(1) does not state, as to deduction in respect of depreciation … only relating to Section 80HH in asst. yrs. 1979-80 and 1980-81.2. On an application under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, the Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this Court:For asst. yr. 1979-80 :'Whether, on

Wipro Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Bang.)211

filed along with the return, it is seen that the assessee-company has claimed exemption under Section 10A of the IT Act in respect of income from Software Technology Parks (STPs), Electronic Hardware Technology Parks (EHTPs), etc. to the extent … Systems Division, STPK/G175/97- 18-11-1997 1999-2000 1999-2000Chennai 111, Mount Road, 98/2761 Guindy, Chennai-600Pune Wipro Ltd., CTS, 685/2B STP/P/VIII(A) 10-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Gurgaon Wipro Ltd., Flat No.201, PCMG/PSE/5 19-3-2000 2000-01 2000-01Mysore -- -- -- 2000-01 2000-01__________________________________________________________________________________________ was filed by the … 51,30,40,538 13,74.67,795 81,17,02,945 23,21,42,811M.G. Road, Bangalore 33,70,79,300 12,96,63,533 7,24,35,762 1,45,20,501Castle Street, Bangalore 34,61,78,547 7,79,95,598 10,13,51,430 30,71,475Mission Road, Bangalore 34,27,44,124 5,24,45,608 81,52,40,615 28,61.59,212Koramangala II, Bangalore --

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability … is now well settled that when there is a conflict between law and equity the former shall prevail.’ 34. Similarly, in Nasiruddin v. Sita Ram Agarwal [(2003) 2 SCC577 (vide para35) this Court observed: (SCC p.588) ‘35.