Advanced Search Results

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Amritsar Beverages Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 14 and 14(3); Information Technology Act, 2000; Evidence Act - Sections 45, 63, 73A, 85A and 85B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 29, 167, 172, 192, 463 and 464; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 273; Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2820; 2006(7)SCALE587; (2006)607SCC7; [2006]147STC657(SC); 2006(2)LC1111(SC); 2006(7)SCC607

developments leading to various different kinds of crimes unforeseen by our legislature come to immediate focus. Information Technology Act, 2000 although was amended to include various kinds of cyber crimes and the punishments therefore, does not deal with … Indian Penal Code deals with the inclusion of the digital signatures. Sections 29, 167, 172, 192 and 463 of the Indian Penal Code have been … a hard disk. Seizure of documents indisputably was done in exercise of the powers of the authorities under Section 14 of the Act, Sub-section (3) whereof reads, thus:14. Production and Inspection of Books, Documents and Accounts:(1) ***(2)

Radiological and Imaging Association Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Rules, 2003 ; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 17, Section 4 and Rule 9; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and Rules, 1996 - Section 30, 32 rw 30, 29, 4(2)(3), 72-A, Rule 12; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 72, 5, 6, 23(2), 72 and 72 A ; Amendment Act of 2003 - Section 17(4); Evidence Act - Section 45

breach of confidentiality and privacy and therefore, constitute an offence punishable under section 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 14. On the other hand, Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned counsel for the Collector and District Magistrate, Kolhapur, Mr. V.D. … sex selection techniques or prenatal sex determination ; and (d) any other matter which may be prescribed. 22. Section 29 provides for maintenance of records and preservation of such record for a period of two years till the

Sanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116

Reported in : 2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;

as the two companies which were intermediaries were protected from prosecution by Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. An affidavit in reply has also been filed on behalf of the respondent - NCB and a rejoinder … engagement or control of a trade in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances controlled and supplied outside India and Section 29 provides for the penalty arising out of an abetment or criminal conspiracy to commit an offence under Chapter

State Rep by The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Cyber Crime Cell, Chennai ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

120-B, 420, 465, 468, 471, 380 and 511 IPC r/w 66, 66-C and 66-B of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 3. During the course of investigation, the names of Suganandan [A3], Muralidharan [A4], Chandra Mohan [A5] and Prakash … (Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records in Crl.M.P.No.3295/2016 in C.C.No.904 of 2015 on the file of XI … of Tamil origin, surfaced and they were arrested by the police on 29.05.2013. Pursuant to the confession statement of Suganandan [A3], the police recovered 14

L’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

primarily on the ground that intermediaries are exempt from liabilities under Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. However, this Court finds that in the present plaint there is an allegation that the applicant- defendant who … the TM Act by the persons to host, display or upload the products or services. The provisions of Section 29, Section 101 and Section 102 of the TM Act, are being looked at in order to interpret as … case. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that 8. protection of Section 79(1) of the IT Act cannot be granted to Defendant No.2. In fact Section 79(1) is subject to Section 79(2) and 79(3) of

Kalyani Sales Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(8), 13(10), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(6), 17(7), 18A, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(8), 19(25), 31, 34, 35, 37, 38(2), 40 and 40(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - 1(4), 2, 3, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 19, 19(1) and 31; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 12, 17 and 18; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2000; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2006P& H107; I(2006)BC1; (2006)142PLR1; [2006]70SCL177(Punj& Har)

the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. It was held that the State Financial Corporation can seek remedy Under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, after abandoning the proceedings Under Section 31 of the Act. Reliance … statutory provisions would be helpful. These are:The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2000.2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-(ha) 'debt' shall have the meaning assigned to it in

Christian Louboutin Sas vs.nakul Bajaj & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Defendants’ use of the Plaintiff’s mark, logos and the Information image is protected under Section 79 of Technology Act, 2000?. b) Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to relief, and if so, in what terms?. E-commerce platforms and their … the TM Act by the persons to host, display or upload the products or services. The provisions of Section 29, Section 101 and Section 102 of the TM Act, are being looked at in order to interpret as … (COMM) 344/2018 Page 6 of 59 2009 (hereinafter, ‘IT Act’). The issue of liability under Section 79 of the IT Act is to be decided on the basis of pleadings and documents on record, none of which are disputed

Moolchand Kharaiti Ram Hospital vs.workers Thru m.k.r.h.karamchar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

from the rigour of the Payment of Bonus Act. W.P.(C) 17938/2004 Page 29 of 32 (iii) Ex. MW-to MW-relate to the benefit, granted to the … referred to as “the Trust”) under Section 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the IT Act”), Ex. MW-was a communication from the Income Tax Authorities, granting approval to the Trust under Section 10(23)(C)(via) of … a statement, showing receipts, expenditure, capital expenditure and resultant surplus of the petitioner-Hospital for the years 1991-1992 to 2000-2001.17. In view of the two affidavits filed by him, MW-1 M.K. Kaushik was cross examined twice. During the

Mandhana Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

head "Profits and gains of business or profession" is chargeable to income-tax under Section 28 and income under Section 29 is to be computed in accordance with the provisions contained in Sections 30 to 43A. The argument that … the assessee's contention and held as under: "The language of the provisions of Sections 32 and 34 of the IT Act, 1961, is specific and admits of no ambiguity. Section 32 allows depreciation as deduction subject to the provisions

Raj Mahto vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

2012 [“POCSO Act”], and Sections 67A/67B of the InformationSigning Date:15.05.2026 BAIL APPLN. 3007/2025 Page 2 of 15 Technology Act, 2000 [“IT Act”], were also added. It was further stated that the applicant had not joined the investigation and … after trial, in order to give due weightage to the intent and purpose of the Legislature in engrafting section 29 in this special statute to protect children from sexual offences, while deciding a bail plea at the post-charge … recorded such acts, thereby attracting serious offences under Section 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 67A/67B of the IT Act. d. The applicant had stayed with the deceased in Hotel Z Black on multiple occasions and had used