Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the it act 2000 section 26 · Page 1 of about 1,857 results (0.092 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 28 2003

Venkatesha Education Society Vs. Dir. It (Exemptions)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2004)90TTJ(Bang.)850

Director of Income-Tax (hereinafter referred to as Exemptions) (DIT (Exe.)) Bangalore, dated 26-7-2002, passed under section 12A of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act").We have heard both sides and perused the records. The facts as … had inducted four more educational institutions and were approved by the KSEEB, Government of Karnataka, from 1985-86 to 2000-01, The assessee had inducted four more educational institutions with necessary approval from the Government authorities.All these factual positions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2005

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-22-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(17); Parliament Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154; Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … be those of that House and of its members and committees immediately before the coming into force of Section 26 of the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978.(4) The provisions of Clauses (1), (2) and (3) shall apply in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2005

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-22-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; ;Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 2(17); ;Parliament Act; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 2(1); ;Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Section 26; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 154; ;Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; ;Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Gau)318,[2005]275ITR502(Gauhati)

of electronic record as defined in Clause (t) of Sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), to afford the authorised officer the necessary facility to inspect such books of account or … be those of that House and of its members and committees immediately before the coming into force of Section 26 of the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978.(4) The provisions of Clauses (1), (2) and (3) shall apply in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 15 2026

Neha Mahajan vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-15-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

No.336/2020, dated 26.10.2020, registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi, under Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 [“IT Act”], and Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”].2. It is stated that the petitioner … petitioner herein, who was married to the complainant’s brother, was accused of the offence under Section 66C of the IT Act and Section 509 of the IPC.6. The petitioner and respondent No.2 have signed a settlement agreement dated 12.08.2025,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2001

Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-20-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD111(Kol.)

order of the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997 … directed against the order of the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the … M/s SB it was clear that payment to assessee-company was made on 26th March, 1993, by M/s CCIL on their behalf. It was further noted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2016

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-03-2016

Subject : Right to Information

the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … asked in strict word that I must follow the order. The duty certificate was granted to me on 26.11.2012, on which Report No.567 time 16.30 was registered, in which there are clear directions. In compliance with this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2018

L’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-12-2018

Subject : MRTP

primarily on the ground that intermediaries are exempt from liabilities under Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. However, this Court finds that in the present plaint there is an allegation that the applicant- defendant who … case. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that 8. protection of Section 79(1) of the IT Act cannot be granted to Defendant No.2. In fact Section 79(1) is subject to Section 79(2) and 79(3) of … in the source code of the website in order to attract traffic; xxvi. Deep-linking to the trade mark owner’s website; 57. Can an e-commerce platform

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2020

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2020

Subject : Election

It is now necessary to set out the relevant provisions of the Evidence Act and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 3 of the Evidence Act defines “document” as follows: “Document.-- "Document" means any matter expressed or described upon … referred to a Bench of three honourable Judges of this Court by a Division Bench reference order dated 26.07.2019, dealing with the interpretation of Section 65B of the Indian 1 Evidence Act, 1872 (“Evidence Act”) by two

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2014

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-12-2014

Subject : MRTP

the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment.‖ 26. The directive principles of state policy contained in Article 39 (e) and … and 5 of the Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 2 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (hereafter referred to as the 'IT Act of 1956').3. As per the complaint, it appears that A & B, hailing from extremely poor families of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2007

Radhe Developers and ors. Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Jun-29-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)113TTJ(Ahd.)300

taken place.26. The Sub-section (10) relating to housing project was amended from time to time. Firstly, by Finance Act, 2000, w.e.f. 1st April, 2000 extending the outer limit for completion of the housing project on or before 31st … dispute that the appellant firm has fulfilled the remaining conditions for claiming the deduction under Section 80-IB(10) of the IT Act, 1961. It has been pointed out by the appellant's representative that as per the development agreement dt. 29th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial