Advanced Search Results

Subhash Gupta (individual) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)78TTJ(JP.)692

at nil income. Accordingly, the AO has completed the assessment at nil income vide order dt. 15th Feb., 2000, passed under Section 143(3) and has also initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c).5. In reply to the show-cause … 266 (Jp.Trib.); (h) Asstt. CIT v. Bansiwala Iron & Steel Re-Rolling Mills 21 Tax World 533 (Jp.Trib.); (j) ITO v. Manjit Singh Baldev Singh Commission … by the CIT(A), dt. 30th March, 2001, confirming the penalty, imposed by the AO under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act amounting to Rs. 14,45,240. "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the learned CIT(A)

M/S Nhdpl South Private Limited vs Union Bank of India

Court : Karnataka

data/electronic communication which involve the use of alternatives to paper based methods of communication and storage of information. The IT Act, 2000 came in to force with effect from 17.10.2000. On account of advanced technology taking giant steps and the … 7.2. He submits that an email correspondence also creates a contract and in this regard, he refers to Section 4 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference.4. Legal recognition of electronic … 2025 BEFORE R THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 2193 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN M/S NHDPL SOUTH PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS

Commissioner of Customs and Central Exci Vs. M/S. Deloitte Tax Servaic ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

He also relied upon the definition of the term "data" in Section 2 (O) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and contended that the activity of the assessee is in relation to operation of computer systems and therefore … then and therefore it did not fall under "Information Technology Services", that the CBEC in its circular dated 21-08- 2003 had clarified that the mere fact that a personal computer or a laptop has been used for

Arun R.K. vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … Sundaram. It was submitted that video-conferencing could not be allowed as the rights of an accused, under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, cannot be subjected to a procedure involving “virtual reality”. Such an argument displays

Dhanya Martin, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … Sundaram. It was submitted that video-conferencing could not be allowed as the rights of an accused, under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, cannot be subjected to a procedure involving “virtual reality”. Such an argument displays

Mohanan.K., vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … Sundaram. It was submitted that video-conferencing could not be allowed as the rights of an accused, under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, cannot be subjected to a procedure involving “virtual reality”. Such an argument displays

Pradeep John, vs the State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … Sundaram. It was submitted that video-conferencing could not be allowed as the rights of an accused, under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, cannot be subjected to a procedure involving “virtual reality”. Such an argument displays

V.V.Soman vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … Sundaram. It was submitted that video-conferencing could not be allowed as the rights of an accused, under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, cannot be subjected to a procedure involving “virtual reality”. Such an argument displays

Shreya Singhal Vs. U.O.I.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

internet is included within its reach. It will be useful to note that Section 2(v) of Information Technology Act, 2000 defines information as follows: "2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (v) "Information" includes data, … that could be viewed over the internet. The petitioners also contend that their rights under Articles 14 and 21 are breached inasmuch there is no intelligible differentia between those who use the internet and those who by

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability … of child abuse and exploitation, deemed it expedient to make the failure to discharge this obligation punishable under Section 21 of the Act. Such provisions have been inserted with a view to ensure strict Criminal Appeal Nos. 2161-2162