Advanced Search Results
Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another
Delhi
Jul-29-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963
Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said … users of its web-site in Delhi or anywhere in India for that matter. Even for the purposes of Section 20(c), CPC, in order to show that some part of the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBlueberry Books and Others Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Delhi
May-25-2016
Intellectual Property
arrayed as parties in the suit. There shall be no order as to costs. Appeal Allowed. Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 20 Validity of order The Single Judge allowed application of some Defendants and directed that they should be deleted
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sahara India Financial Corpn.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
May-20-2003
Direct Taxation
(2003)81TTJLuck389
which is available at p. 1595 to 1621 of the paper book. The judgment is dt. 12th May, 2000. In the public interest litigation, the allegations of irregularities were made against Sahara groups of companies also. Although … the material, completed assessment at Rs. 10,45,77,81,760 vide assessment order dt. 23rd April, 1999, under Section 144 of the IT Act, 1961. (ix) The assessee challenged treatment given by the AO to the special audit report before the learned … Shri J.J. Mehrotra, C.As, represented the assessee.3. Vide order dt. 15th Jan., 2002, it was directed that ITA No.747/All/2000 shall be heard alongwith ITA No.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. U.P. Forest Corporation
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow
Sep-08-2000
Direct Taxation
and 1229/All/1989 for the asst. yrs. 1985-86 and 1986-87 respectively, the Tribunal issued notice under Section 254(2) of the IT Act dt. 30th Aug., 2000 requiring the assessee, M/s. U.P. Forest Corporation, Lucknow and the Revenue to state their … we proceed to decide the matter, which has been initiated on account of our notice dt. 30th Aug., 2000 in respect of order of the Tribunal dt. 9th Sept., 1996 in ITA Nos. 1228 and 1229/All/1989. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskX Corp vs Union of India
Karnataka
Sep-24-2025
2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability … was not in the Act as originally enacted, butcame into force by virtue of an Amendment Act of 2009 with effect from 27-10-2009. Since all the arguments raised by several counsel for the petitioners deal with the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.A.M. Earth Movers (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Mar-27-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)78TTJ(Jodh.)398
appellant has agitated against the revision of order of AO dt. 27th Sept., 1991 under Section 263 of the IT Act, by the CIT. The AO while passing the order for asst. yr.1990-91, dt. 27th Sept., 1991, had allowed … wrong on the part of Commissioner to rely on the judgment of CIT v. Mysore Minerals Ltd. (1994) 205 ITR 461 (Karn) simply because the SLP was admitted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is not acceptable becausee
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.R. Transport Agency Through Its Partner Sri Prabhakar Singh Vs. Unio ...
Allahabad
Sep-24-2005
Civil
Specific Relief Act - Sections 16(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 13(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 41 Rule 27(1) - Order 47 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226
AIR2006All23; 2006(1)AWC504
point either of transmission or of receipt.8. Anticipating the difficulties likely to arise from this, the Information Technology Act, 2000 in Section 13(3) provides as follows :-'(3) Save as otherwise agreed to between the originator and the addressee, … Supreme Court held that it would not oust the jurisdiction of other courts which had territorial jurisdiction under Section 20(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.16. But, more fundamental question needs to be examined, viz. whether the ouster
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Royal Jordanians Airlines
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Aug-31-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)283ITR28(Delhi)
of this argument the learned AO placed reliance on Section 3, Section 5, Section 7, Section 10 and Section 20 of the Royal Jordanian law, 1969.The learned AO held that RJA was a corporation just as Air India … the appellant/respondent Royal Jordanian Airlines (hereinafter referred to as "RJA") is liable to be taxed in India under the IT Act, 1961 in respect of the assessment years in question. The same issue arose in the case of the … 1. These four appeals pertain to asst. yrs. 1995-96, 1994-95, 1996-97 and 2000-2001. Appeal in ITA No. 5252/Del/1998 is Revenue's appeal filed on 3rd Nov.,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSasidharan M.G. vs Union of India
Kerala
Jun-15-2022
the liabilities of the intermediaries and exemptions respectively 3.19 It is submitted that as per Section 69A of the IT Act 2000, MeitY is empowered to block the information for public access through any computer resource only under the following … HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 10819 OF 2021 PETITIONER: SASIDHARAN M.G. AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.LATE GOPALAN, MATHRU
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindira Priyadarshini Forum and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Kerala
Mar-30-2001
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 20(3); Travancore Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955; Information Technology Act, 2000; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3
2001CriLJ2652
by the public. Videgraph of reconstruction of the incident was permissible under the provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 according to the learned Public Prosecutor. The entire case diary as also the travel documents including the video … Central Government to constitute a special police force for investigating the offence or classes of offences notified under Section 3. Going by the organisational set-up, the special police force, C.B.I, operates through the following five Wings: (1) … Superintendent of Police, Aluva is not at all satisfactory.2. O.P. 7213 of 2001 is filed by the President and Secretary of the Bar Association of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »