Advanced Search Results

M/S Patanjali Foods Limited vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

of Delhi has held as under“30. Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as "the IT Act") reads thus :"8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette.- Where any law provides that any rule, … 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE AND HOLD THAT SECTION 25(4) OF THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 AS AMENDED BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2016 IS ARBITRARY ILLEGAL, ULTRAVIRUS AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND STRIKE DOWN THE SAME

Mohanan.K., vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 30TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO.2072 OF 2021 PETITIONERS: 1 ARUN R.K., AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.MADHUSOODANAN.P., RESIDING AT CHITHRA, KUMMANAM, ELAMPARA (PO),

Arun R.K. vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 30TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO.2072 OF 2021 PETITIONERS: 1 ARUN R.K., AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.MADHUSOODANAN.P., RESIDING AT CHITHRA, KUMMANAM, ELAMPARA (PO),

Dhanya Martin, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 30TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO.2072 OF 2021 PETITIONERS: 1 ARUN R.K., AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.MADHUSOODANAN.P., RESIDING AT CHITHRA, KUMMANAM, ELAMPARA (PO),

Pradeep John, vs the State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 30TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO.2072 OF 2021 PETITIONERS: 1 ARUN R.K., AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.MADHUSOODANAN.P., RESIDING AT CHITHRA, KUMMANAM, ELAMPARA (PO),

V.V.Soman vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

paragraph.4. The Special Marriage Act has to be construedwith time, especially, in the light of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 6 of Information Technology Act recognise the use of electronic records in Government and its agencies. Section 6 … A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 30TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO.2072 OF 2021 PETITIONERS: 1 ARUN R.K., AGED 28 YEARS, S/O.MADHUSOODANAN.P., RESIDING AT CHITHRA, KUMMANAM, ELAMPARA (PO),

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … the High Court for quashment of the FIR.8. At this stage, it is pertinent to state that on 19.2.2015 the petitioners filed an application for discharge and the learned Magistrate passed an order discharging the petitioners in

Smt Supraja Chandra vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

order dated 24.03.2015, passed in WP (Criminal) No.167/2012 and connected cases, struck down Section 66-A of Information Technology Act, 2000, in it's entirely, as being violative of Article 19(1)(a) and not saved under Article 19(2) of the Constitution … reported in(2013) 12 SCC 73, decided on 24.03.2015 and therefore, thecharge against the petitioner under Section 66A of the IT Act needs to be set aside and so also offence under Sections 201 and 203 of IPC as they

The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and Another Vs. M/s. Reliance ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

terms signed and signature also include attribution of electronic record as per section 11 of the Information Technology Act, 2000] Section 2(l) : instrument includes every document by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created, … companies are situated in two different States, the Company in state of Maharashtra is entitled for rebate under Section 19 in respect of the stamp duty paid on the said scheme in another State? 4. Whether for the

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant/petitioner approached this Court for declaring that Section 70 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is unconstitutional and unenforceable and also for issuance of a writ of … on which Government is confirmed copyright under Section 17 (d). The learned single Judge held as follows:.Therefore while the IT Act deals with all matters pertaining to information technology, copyright in respect of information technology has to be considered … in the software in view of the amendment in the Copyright Act, 1957 in 1994. When respondents 1 to 4 arranged to modify the software