Advanced Search Results

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability … new forms of crimes-is incorrect, and that Sections 66-B to 67-C and various sections of the Penal Code, 1860 (which will be referred to hereinafter) are good enough to deal with all these crimes.5. The petitioners' various

Farrukhabad GramIn Bank Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)103ITD207Agra

case of Farrukhabad Grameen Bank, Fathegarh in Appeal No. 54/CIT(A)-l/Ward-I/Farrukhabad/1999-2000 dt.29th Feb., 2000 (supra) for asst. yr. 1998-99 has held as under: In the present … authorities below have erred on facts and in law by holding that the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the IT Act, 1961 is not allowable in respect of the income of the bank-assessed as AOP deemed co-operative society. 2. … was limited to urban and semi urban centers only. The bank's objective was to discharge the responsibilities under Section 18(2)(a) and (b) of RRB Act, 1976 by extending credit facilities through implementation of various Government sponsored schemes for

Manoj Jose vs Anil Kumar

Court : Kerala

is registered of offences punishable under Section 294(b) and Section 506 IPC and Section 67 of Information Technology Act,2000. The said case was registered on the base of a complaint filed by the 1 st respondent therein(1st … OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1941 CRIME NO. 217/2018 OF Thankamani Police Station , Idukki PETITIONER: MANOJ JOSE AGED 40 YEARS S/O.

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … they were forced to pay Rs.5 lakhs to respondent no.3, Deepak Thakur, Dy. S.P. Cyber Cell, Bhopal. On 18.12.2012, chargesheet was filed and thereafter a petition under Section 482 CrPC has been filed before the High Court

Sooraj V. Sukumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

sections 354A(1)(iv), 509, 294(b) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act 2000, apart from sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(1)(w)(ii) of the Act in Crime No.744 of 2022 of the Ernakulam … and the said right can be taken away by the statute itself. In tune with the aforesaid principle, section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act'), curtailed the … Babu S.Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner,contended that the offences alleged against the petitioner under the IPC and the IT Act are all bailable, while the offences under the Act are prima facie not attracted, and hence the application

Cambrian Hall Educational Trust Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Delhi)838

getting the sanction from CIT, Meerut, issued notice under Section 148 of the IT Act on 24th Aug., 2000. The learned counsel for the assessee requested for inspection of the file prior to proceeding under Section 148 … 2,67,000. His address is shown by the assessee as Mittal & Co. 18, Patel Nagar, Dehradun. Enquiries conducted by the Department reveal that no such … the statement of Shri Mahadeo Sahi which was recorded under Section 131 when no proceeding was pending under the IT Act in the case of the appellant. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the

Kalyani Sales Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(8), 13(10), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(6), 17(7), 18A, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(8), 19(25), 31, 34, 35, 37, 38(2), 40 and 40(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - 1(4), 2, 3, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 19, 19(1) and 31; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 12, 17 and 18; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2000; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2006P& H107; I(2006)BC1; (2006)142PLR1; [2006]70SCL177(Punj& Har)

statutory provisions would be helpful. These are:The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2000.2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-(ha) 'debt' shall have the meaning assigned to it in … No. 2550 of 2005. These are as follows:On 29.09.2003, the Bank issued to the petitioners a notice Under Section 13(2) of the Act calling upon them to pay an amount of Rs. 88,61,830.68 p. The petitioners filed … of Rs. 88,61,830.68 p. The petitioners filed reply to the notice on 18.10.2003 disputing their liability to pay the said amount. They asked for a

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

This of course would not apply to a Cyber Crime, which comes under global jurisdiction according to the IT Act, 2000. This means that any cyber-crime complaint can be registered with any of the cyber cells in India, irrespective … proceedings in C.C.No.156/2020 initiated against the petitioners in both the matters and certain others for alleged violation of Section 18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 punishable under Section 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

This of course would not apply to a Cyber Crime, which comes under global jurisdiction according to the IT Act, 2000. This means that any cyber-crime complaint can be registered with any of the cyber cells in India, irrespective … proceedings in C.C.No.156/2020 initiated against the petitioners in both the matters and certain others for alleged violation of Section 18(c) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 punishable under Section 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Cit Vs. Virtual Soft Systems Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

first appeal ITA 216, 398, 403, 404 and 680/2011 Page 1 of 18 was concerned, that is, the one relating to 1996-97, the challenge before … assessee had to be sustained, the validity of the order passed in AY 1996-97 under Section 263 of the IT Act or, the validity of the re- assessment proceedings, in so far as, the remaining four assessment years were … to note that before the Tribunal the assessment years (in short AY) in issue were: AYs 1996-97 to 2000-01. Thus, the Tribunal, by virtue of the impugned judgment dealt in all with five (5) appeals being ITA