Advanced Search Results

Firos Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 70, 70(1) and 81; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 17, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999; Limitation Act - Sections 60 and 61; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2006Ker279; 2006(3)KLT210; 2007(34)PTC98(Ker)

on which Government is confirmed copyright under Section 17 (d). The learned single Judge held as follows:.Therefore while the IT Act deals with all matters pertaining to information technology, copyright in respect of information technology has to be considered … J.B. Koshy, J.1. Appellant/petitioner approached this Court for declaring that Section 70 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is unconstitutional and unenforceable and also for issuance of a writ of

Aruna Kashinath Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

without exhausting the alternative remedy of approaching the Controller of Certifying Authorities or the Adjudicating Officer appointed under the IT Act, 2000.? (ii) Whether the ingredients made in the appeal amounted to an offence under the provisions of the Information … Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) “Controller” means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of Section 2 of the IT Act defines the Cyber Appellate Tribunal as under:- (n) “Cyber

Mascon Global Limited Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) “Controller” means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of Section 2 of the IT Act defines the Cyber Appellate Tribunal as under:- (n) “Cyber … without exhausting the alternative remedy of approaching the Controller of Certifying Authorities or the Adjudicating Officer appointed under the IT Act,2000.? (ii) Whether the ingredients made in the appeal amounted to an offence under the provisions of the Information

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … learned Magistrate at Bhopal and the petitioner No.2 was enlarged on bail after being in custody for about 17 days and the petitioner no.1 was released after more than three weeks. There is allegation that they were

Commissioner of Customs and Central Exci Vs. M/S. Deloitte Tax Servaic ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

He also relied upon the definition of the term "data" in Section 2 (O) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and contended that the activity of the assessee is in relation to operation of computer systems and therefore

Cambrian Hall Educational Trust Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)93TTJ(Delhi)838

getting the sanction from CIT, Meerut, issued notice under Section 148 of the IT Act on 24th Aug., 2000. The learned counsel for the assessee requested for inspection of the file prior to proceeding under Section 148 … AO are recorded above in this order as well as on pp.16, 17 and 18 of the assessment order. We may state that even before … the statement of Shri Mahadeo Sahi which was recorded under Section 131 when no proceeding was pending under the IT Act in the case of the appellant. 9. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the

Radiological and Imaging Association Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Rules, 2003 ; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 17, Section 4 and Rule 9; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and Rules, 1996 - Section 30, 32 rw 30, 29, 4(2)(3), 72-A, Rule 12; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 72, 5, 6, 23(2), 72 and 72 A ; Amendment Act of 2003 - Section 17(4); Evidence Act - Section 45

breach of confidentiality and privacy and therefore, constitute an offence punishable under section 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 14. On the other hand, Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned counsel for the Collector and District Magistrate, Kolhapur, Mr. V.D. … Magistrate, Kolhapur has filed affidavit-in-reply dated 28 February 2011 submitting, interalia, as under:- 5.1 Vide notifications issued under Section 17 of the Act, the Collectors and District Magistrates as well as Civil Surgeons or Deans of Medical Colleges

Ashwinbhai Somabhai Patel and anr. Vs. Nrugendraprasadji Ajendraprasad ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 3, 65, 65(1), 65(A), 65(B), 65B(1), 65(2) and 65B(2); Information Technology Act, 2000; Registration Act - Sections 17; Information Technology (Certifying Authorities) Rules, 2000; Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officer and manner on holding inquiry) Rules, 2003; Information Technology (Security Procedure) Rules, 2004; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Civil Practice Rules- Rule 60; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)3GLR2352

There is no evidence to suggest that it is electronic record as per the provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000 and as per Sections 65A and B or amended Evidence Act.(iii) The documents produced vide Exh. 54/1 does … It is submitted that for example unregistered of the document of the transfer of property requiring registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act, cannot be looked into for the purpose of interim injunction application.Shri S.N. Shelat, learned

Phonepe Private Limited vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

petitioner further avers in the petition that it is only an intermediary as defined under the Information Technology Act, 2000 (‘IT Act’ for short) and facilitates services as a system provider and petitioner and only provides a platform … The learned counsel Sri Nitin Ramesh would vehementlycontend that the petitioner is an intermediary under Section 79 of the IT Act. The owner of the entire UPI platform is National Payments Corporation of India. Neither the petitioner nor its … ೆ ಬಂದು ದೂರುನು: 8ೕCರು6ೆ_ೕ9ೆ. ¢£ÁAPÀ:03/11/2022 vÀªÀÄä «±Áé¹, ¸À»/- ¢£ÁAPÀ 3/11/2022 gÀAzÀÄ ¸ÀAeÉ 17:30 UÀAmÉUÉ ¦gÁå¢ oÁuÉUÉ ºÁdgÁV ¤ÃrzÀ zÀÆgÀ£ÄÀ ß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ ªÉÆ.£ÀA.193/22 PÀ®A 66 (d)

Kalyani Sales Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(8), 13(10), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(6), 17(7), 18A, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(8), 19(25), 31, 34, 35, 37, 38(2), 40 and 40(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - 1(4), 2, 3, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 19, 19(1) and 31; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 12, 17 and 18; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2000; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2006P& H107; I(2006)BC1; (2006)142PLR1; [2006]70SCL177(Punj& Har)

Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, would have the jurisdiction to entertain an application contemplated Under Section 17 of the Act in respect of the debts less than Rs.10 lacs but more than Rs.1 lac ?3. … statutory provisions would be helpful. These are:The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2000.2. Definitions.-(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-(ha) 'debt' shall have the meaning assigned to it in