Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the it act 2000 section 15 · Page 1 of about 2,904 results (0.078 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 12 2014

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-12-2014

Subject : MRTP

the matter was to be examined in the light of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (‗JJ Act, 2000‘ hereafter) and not by the Magistrate under Section 17A of the IT Act, 1956. It … court is to proceed in a matter where the persons recovered by the police in a raid under Section 15 or 16 of the IT Act, 1956, are under 18 years of age. Are the authorities required to … and 5 of the Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 2 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (hereafter referred to as the 'IT Act of 1956').3. As per the complaint, it appears that A & B, hailing from extremely poor families of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2024

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2024

Subject : Right to Information

2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability … links, without ever downloading such material onto their device.110. As earlier mentioned, prior to the 2019 Amendment Act, Section 15 of the POCSO only criminalized the storage of any child pornographic material for any commercial purpose. Thereafter, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

This of course would not apply to a Cyber Crime, which comes under global jurisdiction according to the IT Act, 2000. This means that any cyber-crime complaint can be registered with any of the cyber cells in India, irrespective … JADHAV, HCGP) Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 2 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.PC., PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DATED0506.2020 IN C.C.NO.156/2020 PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL … of Snapdeal and on subsequent dates, the same exercise was repeated. On 15.01.2020, Snapdeal replied to the Respondent. 4.17.10. On the basis of the above

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2021

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

This of course would not apply to a Cyber Crime, which comes under global jurisdiction according to the IT Act, 2000. This means that any cyber-crime complaint can be registered with any of the cyber cells in India, irrespective … JADHAV, HCGP) Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 2 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.PC., PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DATED0506.2020 IN C.C.NO.156/2020 PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL … of Snapdeal and on subsequent dates, the same exercise was repeated. On 15.01.2020, Snapdeal replied to the Respondent. 4.17.10. On the basis of the above

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2004

Vinod Kumar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Decided on : Jun-30-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)98TTJAgra769

the record and are useful for disposal of these appeals, as under : 4. On 2nd of April, 2000, the police of Palanpur, Distt. Banskantha, in the State of Gujarat, intercepted a jeep No. HP-03/3313 in which … CIT(A), dt. 9th Oct., 2002, whereby he has upheld the validity of notices issued under Section 158BC of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and consequential assessments for block period both on legal ground and … 2002, whereby he has upheld the validity of notices issued under Section 158BC of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2012

Tirumala Devi Eada and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Law (La ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-17-2012

Subject : Education

A.P. State Gazette is immaterial. At the outset, we may refer to Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000: “8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette:- Where any law provides that any rule, regulation, order, … of Service) Rules, 1974 framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India is a civil post under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, held that the post of Assistant Public Prosecutor was a civil post

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2000

Madanapalli Institute of Technology and Science and Others Vs. State o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-01-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10, 11 and 23; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation fee) Act, 1983 - Sections 3(1) and 12; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 246(1 and 3), 248, 252, 254 and 371-D; Andhra Pradesh Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission into under-graduate professional courses through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 1993 - Rules 4, 5, 6 and 7; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission) Order, 1974; Constitution (Amendment) Act, 1976; Andhra Pradesh Commissionerate of Higher Education Act, 1986; University Grants Commission Act, 1956; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 10(A and B(3)); Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 -

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD179; 2000(1)ALT666

Matched in: Citation 2000(2)ALD179; 2000(1)ALT666

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2005

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 - Sections 14; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3 to 11, 12 to 18, 26, 28, 36(2), 37, 40, 49A, 50, 51, 53, 60 and 67 to 69; Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1956; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5 to 18, 19, 20, 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 69(1), 72, 73 and 75 to 83; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 20, 26, 26(6), 55, 53, 70, 76, 79 and 185(3); Electricity Act, 1887; Electricity Act, 1903; Electricity Laws (Amendment) Act, 1998; Electricity Regulation Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 13, 22, 28 and 29; Electricity Reforms Act; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 3 to 11, 12, 14, 15, 19 to 27, 63 and 63(3); Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1947; Bureau of Indian Sta

Reported in : 126(2006)DLT49

mess. Various State Governments enacted Electricity Reforms Acts. In the Union Territory of Delhi, the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 was promulgated on 23.11.2000.37. Vide Section 3 of the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 the Delhi Electricity Regulatory … to incorporate companies for the purposes of, inter alia, distributing electricity in the National Capital Territory of Delhi. Section 15 shows that with effect from the date of the transfer scheme, all rights and liabilities of the Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2003

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-10-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

only one ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89, … reasons given below 10. Facts of the case which I have gathered from an order passed under Section 154 of the IT Act for the assessment year under consideration, i e , 1988-89 is that the AO

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2023

Varghese Mathew @ Ajinithya vs State

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-11-2023

prosecution for having committed offences punishable under Sections 505(1)(b) of the IPC, Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Section 118(e) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011.2. The short facts of the case are under:-On August … Later, the investigation was completed, and a final report was laid before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on 15.12.2018. Cognizance was taken, and the case has been numbered as C.C.No.859 of 2019 on the file of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial