Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the it act 2000 section 13 · Page 1 of about 2,989 results (0.165 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 24 2005

P.R. Transport Agency Through Its Partner Sri Prabhakar Singh Vs. Unio ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-24-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 16(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 13(3); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 41 Rule 27(1) - Order 47 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : AIR2006All23; 2006(1)AWC504

point either of transmission or of receipt.8. Anticipating the difficulties likely to arise from this, the Information Technology Act, 2000 in Section 13(3) provides as follows :-'(3) Save as otherwise agreed to between the originator and the addressee,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2006

Ece Industries Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-29-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)111TTJ(Delhi)11

been brought within the purview of Section 50B which has been brought on the statute w.e.f. 1st April, 2000. Section 50B could not be made applicable to the assessee's case during the asst. yr. 1997-98. Such provision being … which is part of the agreement and which is available at pp. 13 to 16 of the paper book. In the list of items included … lamp division should not be treated as short-term capital gain as per the provisions of Section 50(2) of the IT Act, 1961. In response to the notice, it was submitted on behalf of the assessee that the Sonepat unit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2014

Pushpanjali Tie Up Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Renudevi Choudhary and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-07-2014

Subject : Right to Information

electronic record, section 13(2) does not contain such a deeming provision. 19. In any event section 13 of the IT Act is not relevant for deciding whether a party had knowledge of an order for the purpose of the … had knowledge of the order on 29.10.2013 itself. 16. Mr.Setalvad relied upon section 13(2)(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) to contend that respondent No.3 must be deemed to have had knowledge of the ad-interim order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 23 2024

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2024

Subject : Right to Information

2(w) of the IT Act in checking the proliferation of child pornography is significant. Section 79 of the IT Act, 2000 which relates to due diligence that is to be observed by an intermediary, provides an exemption from liability … as Section 35 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, the “NDPS Act”), Section 138A of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short, the “Customs Act”), Section 278E of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2009

Rajiv Dinesh Gadkari Through P.A. Depamala Gadkari Vs. Smt. Nilangi Ra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-16-2009

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9 and 13(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67; Family Court Act, 1984 - Sections 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3 Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4629

Mumbai and the FIR is registered on 20th September, 2003 under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.13. During the course of hearing, learned Counsel for the respondent has fairly submitted that she has no interest … the marriage between the appellant and the respondent husband has been dissolved by a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.2. The respondent wife preferred Petition No. A 693 of 2004 for a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2013

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

Subject : Right to Information

alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This … copy of notice is at Annexure C and reply thereto is at Annexure D to the Writ Petition. 13 In paragraphs 10 and 11 of this Writ Petition, this is what is alleged: “10. Prataprao Govind Pawar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

Snapdeal Private Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

This of course would not apply to a Cyber Crime, which comes under global jurisdiction according to the IT Act, 2000. This means that any cyber-crime complaint can be registered with any of the cyber cells in India, irrespective … JADHAV, HCGP) Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 2 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.PC., PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DATED0506.2020 IN C.C.NO.156/2020 PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL … No.4676 of 2020 1 8 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 period between 13.10.2014 and 16.12.2014, 4.17.3. Snapdeal warned Accused No.1 not to sell the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2021

Sri. Kunal Bahl Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

This of course would not apply to a Cyber Crime, which comes under global jurisdiction according to the IT Act, 2000. This means that any cyber-crime complaint can be registered with any of the cyber cells in India, irrespective … JADHAV, HCGP) Crl.P. No.4676 of 2020 2 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.PC., PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DATED0506.2020 IN C.C.NO.156/2020 PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL … No.4676 of 2020 1 8 & Crl.P. No.4712 of 2020 period between 13.10.2014 and 16.12.2014, 4.17.3. Snapdeal warned Accused No.1 not to sell the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2005

Syed AsifuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-29-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1) and 65; Income Tax Act - Sections 65 and 66; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14 and 63; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 405, 409, 415 and 420

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD(Cri)96; 2005CriLJ4314

409, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC), Section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, IT Act) and Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short, Copyright Act).2. The crime … the rental;(c) and (d) omitted.28. Therefore, reading Section 2(o), (ffc) and Sections 13 and 14 together, it becomes clear that a computer programme is by … a charge specifically with regard to hacking with computer system, which is an offence under Section 66 of the IT Act. At this stage, we may read Sections 65 and 66 of the IT Act.65. Tampering with computer source

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2011

Radiological and Imaging Association Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Rules, 2003 ; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 17, Section 4 and Rule 9; Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and Rules, 1996 - Section 30, 32 rw 30, 29, 4(2)(3), 72-A, Rule 12; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 72, 5, 6, 23(2), 72 and 72 A ; Amendment Act of 2003 - Section 17(4); Evidence Act - Section 45

breach of confidentiality and privacy and therefore, constitute an offence punishable under section 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 14. On the other hand, Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned counsel for the Collector and District Magistrate, Kolhapur, Mr. V.D. … Observer' among others. 3. This issues with the approval of competent authority." Sd/- Director (PNDT Division) Rival Submissions 13. At the hearing of the petition, the learned advocate as well as the learned counsel for the petitioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial