Advanced Search Results

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

measures. CIDR being a computer resource is notified to be a “Protected System” under Section 70 of the IT Act, 2000 by the Central Government on 11.12.2015. Anyone trying to unlawfully gain access into this system is liable to … there are directions prohibiting manipulation and fraudulent practices but the Act contains penal provisions for such violations in Chapter VII of the Regulations. The enrolment agencies are empanelled by the Authority. They are given an enrolling agency … dissent and influence political decision making. The Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 219 of 567 architecture of the project

Aruna Kashinath Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Adjudicating Officer. It reads as under:- 46. Power to adjudicate.- (2) For the purpose of adjudging under this Chapter whether any person has committed a contravention of any of the provisions of this Act or of any … without exhausting the alternative remedy of approaching the Controller of Certifying Authorities or the Adjudicating Officer appointed under the IT Act, 2000.? (ii) Whether the ingredients made in the appeal amounted to an offence under the provisions of the Information

Mascon Global Limited Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Adjudicating Officer. It reads as under:- 46. Power to adjudicate.- (2) For the purpose of adjudging under this Chapter whether any person has committed a contravention of any of the provisions of this Act or of any … without exhausting the alternative remedy of approaching the Controller of Certifying Authorities or the Adjudicating Officer appointed under the IT Act,2000.? (ii) Whether the ingredients made in the appeal amounted to an offence under the provisions of the Information

Subhash Chand Chopra Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)92TTJ(Delhi)1087

AO and the material pointed out by parties in their paper books.6. Chapter XIV-B starts with s, 158B and provides the definition of "block period" … yrs. 1986-87 to 1996-97 upto the period 13th Oct., 1995, passed under Section 143(3) r/w Section 158BC of the IT Act.2. Since large number of issues are involved in this appeal, therefore, it is necessary to reproduce all the … banks only, namely, Vijaya Bank and Bank of Baroda. According to the enquiries, for the draft Nos. 0005745, 20005754 which were purchased by the assessee from Bank of India and draft Nos. 0005690 to 0005704 which were

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Tea Agency Trading Centre

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)88ITD96(Gau.)

or generation and distribution of power only. Further, Section 45(1A) was inserted in the Act w.e.f. 1st April, 2000, and the same was not applicable in the year under consideration. Hence, following the decision of the Hon'ble … of the provisions of Section 43(6)(c) r/w Expln. 4 in the same Chapter of the Act for arriving WDV of such assets which in this … pay capital gains tax.Now, the issue remains as to whether the assessee's case falls under Section 43 of the IT Act. The Taxation Laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1986, has introduced w.e.f. 1st April, 1988, a new scheme … "1. For that the learned CIT(A) was not justified in deleting Rs. 2,82,792, Rs. 2,805, Rs. 25,911, Rs. 2,27,590 out of disallowance of Rs. 15,22,807

P. Govinda Satyanarayana Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Vizag

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)98TTJVisakha908

and 10th Feb., 2000, which were presumed by the AO to have been recorded under Section 132(4) of the IT Act. Vide statement dt. 10th Feb., 2000, the assessee made a disclosure of Rs. 30.29 lakhs as unaccounted income … the additions made on the basis of the investments made as undisclosed income are outside the scope of Chapter XIV-B of the IT Act. Although the search and seizure has taken place in the premises of the … by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A), dt. 13th Sept., 2002, block assessment made by the AO under Section 158BC has been challenged.2.

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Borosil Glass Works Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Mum.)361

required to be carried forward in the computation of income under the provisions of IT Act, other than Chapter XII-B which contains Section 115J. In our view, on plain reading of Section 115J(2), there is no doubt … only one ground raised in this appeal It relates to interpretation of the provisions of Section 115J(2) of the IT Act, 1961. The facts of the case in brief are as follows : 3. For the asst. yr. 1988-89,

Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD111(Kol.)

CIT (1999) 238 ITR 13 (Cal) in which it was held that once the search is complete under Chapter XIV-B of the IT Act all additions should be made only in the block assessment and the regular … order of the CIT(A) confirming mostly the additions made in the block assessment completed under Sections 143(3)/158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961.2. The search and seizure operations took place in the premises of the assessee-company on 22nd Jan., 1997

Babros Machinery Mfrs. (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)84ITD91(Ahd.)

books of account, the same cannot be considered as undisclosed income of the assessee for the purpose of Chapter XIV-B. It was pleaded that the reason for holding that the sales of Rs. 9,61,669 made by the … passed by the AO who is Dy. CIT(A) Special Range-2, Ahmedabad, under Section 158BD r/w Section 158BC(c) of the IT Act, 1961 for the Block Period asst. yrs. 1986-87 to 1995-96 and 1st April, 1995 to 8th Sept., 1995.2.

Vijay Industries Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Raj)90; [2004]270ITR175(Raj)

defined in the IT Act. It may also be noted that there are a number of provisions under Chapter VI-A, some of which refer to the term 'profit and gains' and some of them refer to the … only relating to Section 80HH in asst. yrs. 1979-80 and 1980-81.2. On an application under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, the Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this Court:For asst. yr. 1979-80 :'Whether, on