Advanced Search Results

Prabhakar Tulshiramji Mankar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 17, 18 and 30(3); Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 10

Reported in : 2005(2)ALLMR34; 2005(2)BomCR268; 2005(1)MhLj228

distribution of Insecticides holding licence Nos. AMT/203, AMT/283, AMT/320, AMT/336 and AMT/66 respectively issued under Section 13 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 read with Sub-Rule (4) of Rule 10 of the Rules framed thereunder. On 29th August, 1990, the petitioners

Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 26, 27 and 36; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 39, 41 and 42; Clean Air Acts

Reported in : AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)

after considering the recommendations of the Expert Committee and after consultation with the Registration Committee set up under the Insecticides Act 1968 cancelled the Certificate of Registration in respect ofAaldrin, restricted the use of Dieldrin, for Locust Control in desert … proviso to sub-section (3) of Section 9 confers power on the Committee to refuse to register the insecticide. Section 10 provides for an appeal against the decision of the Registration Committee to the Central Government against non-registration. Section

Syngenta India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 5, 5(1), 9, 9(3B), 9(3C), 9(4), 10, 14 and 15; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 1977; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Insecticide Rule - Rules 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 39.2, 39.3 and 226

Reported in : 161(2009)DLT413

impugns the decision of the Union Department of Agriculture, dated 5-11-2008, rejecting its appeal under Section 10 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 ('the Act') against the decision of the Registration Committee to granting for Emamectin Benzoate 5% SG to the

Tropical Agro Systems India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner and Director of Agri ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 5, 10, 12, 13 and 14; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 9 and 10(4-A and 5)

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD492; 1998(6)ALT208

be refused to be renewed after dealership licences were issued to the dealers. There are certain provisions in the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules framed thereunder which require the examination by this Court in the context of the controversies … to apply for registration of such insecticide to the Registration Committee appointed under Section 5 of the Act. Section 10 lays down that an appeal can be filed against non-registration or cancellation which would show that if a

Gupta Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 24 and 29; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)571; JT2002(Suppl1)SC516; 2002(5)WLN776

against the company and its managing director and directors, alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 29(1)(a) of the Insecticides Act, 1968. By then the shelf-life of the insecticides in question had expired. Section 29 provides that whoever imports, manufactures, … may be stated thus:M/s Gupta Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in manufacture of pesticides and insecticides including B.H.C. 10% dust, batch No. B/10-172 and phonates 10-G which are the materials in question in the present proceeding .

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

in the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to Prevention of Food … tenability of Criminal Case Nos. 393/2000, 81/1999, 31/1999, 5/1999, 18/2000, 463/2007 and 10 of 1999.2. In view of huge increase in the offences taking place … after shelf life of the product and `best before period' had already lapsed and therefore valuable right under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act was lost and therefore the prosecution of the applicant or the

Joint Director of Agriculture (inputs) Directorate of Agriculture, Che ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1996CriLJ530

calling upon the respondent to show cause why suitable action should not be initiated under the provisions of the Insecticides Act, 1968, for the manufacture of Mis-branded chemical. While acknowledging the receipt of the show-cause notice, the respondent submitted an … in lack or deficiency proportionately in the ingredients relating to quality also. 10. The plea on behalf of the respondents that the Insecticide Analysts have … Rules is also said to be in excess of the rule making powers of the Central Government under section 36(2) of the Act while adverting to Sec. 9 of the Act, Rules 21, 23 and 24(2) of

A.K. Chauhan Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 9, 17, 18, 29, 30 and 33; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2), 156(1) and 482; Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rule 10; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4611

Insecticides Ltd. under Sections 3(k)(i), 9, 17, 18,29, 30, 3(c) and 33 of Insecticides Act, 1968 and Rule 10 of Insecticides Rules, 1971.2. On 2.7.1993 the business premises of M/s Garg Trading Co., Bareta was inspected by … active ingredient contained from which it was clear the Anilophos 30% EC was misbranded under Section 3(k)(i) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 as the sample contained only 24.91% active ingredient contents of Anilophos instead of 30% EC. It was reported

Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Government of A.P. Vs. Tropi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 10, 10(4A) and 10(5); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 9, 13 and 14

Reported in : 1999(5)ALD243; 1999(5)ALT512

Central Board of Insecticides and is having a valid and subsisting Registration Certificate, issued under Section 9 of the Insecticides Act, 1968, (Central Act 46 of 1968) (for short 'the Act'). It has also obtained a licence under Section 13 … the principal (manufacturer) by the dealer, whichhe has to file before the licencing authority in terms of Rule 10 of the Rules, when he desires to obtain a licence to deal with the insecticides manufactured by the

Mohinder Singh Chauhan S/O Shri Virender Singh Chauhan, Vs. State of H ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3(K)(1), 17, 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4), 29(3) and 33; Insecticides Rules; Companies Act

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2656

the Central Insecticides Laboratory for re-testing as per the provisions laid down under Section 24(3) and 24(4) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and rules made thereunder.xxxxx8. IT is clear from the above reproduced contents that on receipt of copy of … test report of the Senior Analyst. Quality Control Laboratory (Insecticides), State Agriculture Department, Haryana was sent to them:-1. x x x x x2. The alleged report of Senior Analyst, Quality Control Laboratory (Insecticides), Karnal, Haryana is not