Advanced Search Results

Anilkumar vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the PoCSO Act’), and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.4. Annexure-A2 is the

ABIMANYU Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

offences under Sections 296(b), 75, 77, 78 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. Challenging the same, the petitioner has come up with this petition.3. Learned counsel for the … Inspector of Police, Mailam Police Station, Viluppuram District. Crime No.695 of 2024.2. Sivaranjini ...RespondentsCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to call for the records pertaining to the case in Crime No.695 of 2024

Gokul Krishna G.S vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Crime Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram Rural, registered under Sections 354C and 509 of IPC, Sections 66E and 67 of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Section 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, for quashing

Prinu vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Section 294(b) of IPC and Sections 66E and 67 of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.4. Respondent No.2, the defacto complainant, entered appearance through counsel. An affidavit sworn to by her

Kishore Kumar, vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Station, Kollam registered under Sections 376, 420, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC, and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2008.2. The prosecution allegation is that, the petitioner who isarrayed as the 1st accused in the crime, befriended

M.Saravanan, Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

2023, Sections 3(1)(e) and 3(1)(r) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 66E & 67 of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.4. The learned counsel appearing for both the petitioners and the defacto complainant submitted that the … Crime No.02 of 2025.3.S.Anitha, Wife of Saravanan, No.1/403/1, Main Road, Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime

Commissioner Of Service Tax Delhi Vs. Quick Heal Technologies Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

is registered with the Service Tax Commissioner, Pune­III for providing taxable services, inter alia, under the category of “Information Technology Software 2 Service”. The assessee is engaged in the development of Quick Heal brand Antivirus Software which is … the Act 1994 w.e.f 01.07.2012 on the services covered under the category of “Information Technology Software Service” under Section 66E(d) of the Act 1994 for providing Quick Heal brand Antivirus Software license key/code supplied along with the CD/DVD … to use of tangible goods service has also been brought under the service tax net by the Finance Act, 2008, with effect from 16.05.2008 vide notification No.18/2008­ST, 35 dated 10.05.2008 whereby taxable service has been defined under Section

Infosys Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of development and sale of information technology related services like customization of software, implementation of software, annual technical and support services, trading/support services of third-party … is deemed to be a sale within the meaning of clause (29A) of Article 366 of the Constitution. Section 66E provides for declared services. A declaration is found at clause (d) that development, design, programming, customization, adaptation, upgradation,

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

aspect becomes very clear if one peruses Section 66 which has been substituted by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) w.e.f. 27.10.2009. That Section 66 reads as under: “66. Computer related offences: If any person, … specifically said so. In that behalf, our attention is invited to Sections 66E, 67, 67A and 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000. For these … Crime Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited.

Prajwal Revanna Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

for offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 376(2)(k), 354A, 354B, 354C, 506 of the IPC and Section 66(E) of the Information Technology Act, 2008 and pending before the LXXXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore city, is knocking at the doors … STATION, CID POLICE STATION, BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S3762)(n), 376(2)(k), 506, 354(A), 354(B), 354(C) OF IPC AND SEC. 66E OF I.T. ACT, 2008, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XLII ADDL. CMM AT BENGALURU. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION